search for: repesentations

...Author: Adam Husar, FIT BUT, ihusar at fit.vutbr.cz Abstract: Presentation deals with intermediate presentations used in LLVM during compilation from a high-level programming language into assembly language. It briefly describes clang's AST, then LLVM IR, and also Selection DAG and Machine Code repesentations. It can be dowloaded here http://www.uschovna.cz/en/zasilka/AIXP5T3ST6UCPPH6-KFV/?set_lang=en, or I can send it also directly through email. Best regards Adam Husar

Hi, I would like to visualize a tree extracted from a random forest using getTree {randomForest}. I'm wondering if there is any way to do it directly or to convert my tree to any other class of tree repesentation, which then can be plotted? Regards, Umang Rathi ________________________________ This email message may contain proprietary, private and confidential information. The information

Hi, I intend to write an optimization using LLVM. But before doing that I felt like understanding the tools. I wrote a hello world program to be compiled and executed. But then one of the tutorials suggested using Clang, an other said dragonegg, a third suggested using llvm-gcc. I am confused as to which one to use. Can some one help me in 1. What are the differences between these three? 2. Which

----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com> To: "Adam King" <kinga@sghs.org.uk>, libvirt-users@redhat.com Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:17:09 AM Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] virsh snapshot On 08/20/2014 06:34 PM, Adam King wrote: > Hi, > [Can you convince your mailer to wrap long lines?] > > I had a 'domain' called

On 08/21/2014 12:51 AM, Adam King wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com> > To: "Adam King" <kinga@sghs.org.uk>, libvirt-users@redhat.com > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:17:09 AM > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] virsh snapshot Including this blurb in the reply was overkill. > >> > I then

> Your quoting is horrible. You used the same prefix for your original > content as for my reply (">> >" in both cases). I'm not sure what > mailer you are using, but it is making conversation difficult. OK, let's see if this is better. Turned out my email app wasn't doing text wrap and quoting prefix default was bizarre....my apologies. > > >

Hi, I am using R 1.9.1 on on i686 PC with SuSE Linux 9.0. I have a data.frame, e.g.: > myData <- data.frame( var1 = c( 1:4 ), var2 = c (5:8 ) ) If I add a new column by > myData$var3 <- myData[ , "var1" ] + myData[ , "var2" ] everything is fine, but if I omit the commas: > myData$var4 <- myData[ "var1" ] + myData[ "var2" ] the name