Displaying 20 results from an estimated 194 matches for "repackagers".
2019 May 09
0
Firefox esr repackage
The price we pay.. :)
BTW, Mozilla publishes tarballs that you can simply extract and run (and will self-update), you can use those (it's what I am doing as a workaround in fact until RH catches up):
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/60.6.3esr/linux-x86_64/
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
> From: "CentOS
2010 Aug 28
1
problem after repackaging
Hy,
I had a mistake on a function of a package i have created!
I have solved it and then i repackaged and installed the modified package.
I use to launch R from Excel!
And so when i launch R, and next call my function from the workspace, i
still find the problem on my function.
And when i read on my workspace, the source code of my function, i find the
old version of my function (the one from the
2008 Dec 17
1
RPM rollback/repackage with CentOS 4
Hi,
Is there any way to list availabe RPM rollback's and timestamps in CentOS 4?
It's possible to get RPM rollbacks with up2date, but appears that's
deprecated ;-(
# up2date --list-rollbacks
This feature is deprecated and no longer functional
I want a method to list current available rollback and the timestamp:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7034
How do you deal with this
2011 Jul 15
2
VMware Thinapp and Kace Repackager + Adobe CS5
I've read the DB for Adobe Photoshop CS5, and a member mentioned using Kace Repackager to create a installable MSI package. I cant find much docs or guides to using the program and Im having trouble using it. I would select Setup.exe for the Photoshop or Dreamweaver installation, allow it to pre and post scan the changes and the result is a unexpected small .msi file. How do you use this msi
2019 May 09
3
Firefox esr repackage
> The price we pay.. :)
Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox packages?
Regards,
Simon
>
> BTW, Mozilla publishes tarballs that you can simply extract and run (and
> will self-update), you can use those (it's what I am doing as a workaround
> in fact until RH catches up):
> https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/60.6.3esr/linux-x86_64/
>
2019 May 08
2
Firefox esr repackage
> I was told lately about this workaround, check it out.
> https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/
The signing thing is a security feature. I don't like a workaround to
disable a security feature instead of fixing it.
What makes me feel a bit bad is that everybody has fixed versions by now,
only we enterprise Linux users using the ESR version
2019 May 08
0
Firefox esr repackage
I was told lately about this workaround, check it out.
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
> From: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org>
> Sent:
2019 May 10
0
Firefox esr repackage
Hi Nux,
The number will be higher than that. Some large systems just download
once to their own private mirror and install from there. Where I used
to work each download went to at least 6 systems, probably more.
Regards,
Martin
On 10/05/2019 10:12, Nux! wrote:
> I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user
2010 Aug 29
0
need help for a repackaging problem!
Hy,
I had a mistake on a function of a package i have created!
I have solved it and then i repackaged and installed the modified package.
I use to launch R from Excel!
And so when i launch R, and next call my function from the workspace, i
still find the problem on my function.
And when i read on my workspace, the source code of my function, i find the
old version of my function (the one from the
2019 May 10
2
Firefox esr repackage
I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading stuff from it.
It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual desktop users and some users were using multiple IPs (dhcp), but it shows there are quite a few users out there running CentOS for desktop purposes.
There are desktop focused distros
2019 May 08
0
Firefox esr repackage
firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote:
> Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well
> know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin.
>
> From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates
> repository is 60.6.1-1.el7. It looks like Mozilla have just released
> firefox esr 60.6.2 which should fix the signing issue. (see
>
2019 May 08
1
Firefox esr repackage
cool!! that works for now.. thanks Mark!!
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:21 AM mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
> firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote:
> > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well
> > know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin.
> >
> > From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates
2019 May 09
0
Firefox esr repackage
On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
>> The price we pay.. :)
>
> Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox packages?
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
No, Red Hat have not yet released any updates for Firefox. I doubt it's
a priority for them.
2019 May 10
0
Firefox esr repackage
Hello Nux!,
On Fri, 10 May 2019 10:12:59 +0100 (BST) Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote:
> I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading stuff from it.
>
> It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual desktop users and some users were using multiple IPs (dhcp), but it shows
2019 May 10
0
Firefox esr repackage
> Am 10.05.2019 um 11:12 schrieb Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro>:
>>
>> I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year
>> or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading
>> stuff from it.
>>
>> It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual desktop users and
>> some users were using multiple IPs
2012 May 12
1
xulrunner 1.9.2.26 available in repackaged form for use with legacy programs
I have re-packaged xulrunner 1.9.2.26 for CentOS 5 for use with older
applications which can't be run with xulrunner 10.0.4. I created
'compatibity' RPMs that can be safely installed alongside xulrunner
10.0.4. I needed it to run the Evergreen 2.1 and 2.2 Staff Clients at
our local library. The RPMs are available in the Deepwoods Software
repo at the URL:
2019 May 08
6
Firefox esr repackage
Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin.
From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates repository is 60.6.1-1.el7.
It looks like Mozilla have just released firefox esr 60.6.2 which should fix the signing issue.
(see https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/60.6.2/releasenotes/)
Would it
2019 May 10
5
Firefox esr repackage
> On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
>>> The price we pay.. :)
>>
>> Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox
>> packages?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Simon
>>
>
> No, Red Hat have not yet released any updates for Firefox. I doubt it's
> a priority for them.
Which makes me believe they don't
2019 May 14
1
Firefox esr repackage
On 11/05/19 2:05 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
>> Am 10.05.2019 um 11:12 schrieb Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro>:
>>> I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year
>>> or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading
>>> stuff from it.
>>>
>>> It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual
2019 May 10
2
Firefox esr repackage
Am 10.05.2019 um 11:12 schrieb Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro>:
>
> I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading stuff from it.
>
> It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual desktop users and some users were using multiple IPs (dhcp), but it shows there are quite a few users