search for: repackage

...drant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 17:24:57 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage >> I was told lately about this workaround, check it out. >> https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/ > > The signing thing is a security feature. I don't like a workaround to > disable a security feature instead of fixing it. >...

Hy, I had a mistake on a function of a package i have created! I have solved it and then i repackaged and installed the modified package. I use to launch R from Excel! And so when i launch R, and next call my function from the workspace, i still find the problem on my function. And when i read on my workspace, the source code of my function, i find the old version of my function (the one from the...

...up2date --list-rollbacks This feature is deprecated and no longer functional I want a method to list current available rollback and the timestamp: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7034 How do you deal with this feature? Is there any plugin for Yum? Now I list packages from "/var/spool/repackage/" and install/rollback manually, but I would prefer something more straightforward. Regards, -- Santi Saez http://woop.es

I've read the DB for Adobe Photoshop CS5, and a member mentioned using Kace Repackager to create a installable MSI package. I cant find much docs or guides to using the program and Im having trouble using it. I would select Setup.exe for the Photoshop or Dreamweaver installation, allow it to pre and post scan the changes and the result is a unexpected small .msi file. How do you use...

...Nux! > www.nux.ro > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> >> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> >> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 17:24:57 >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage > >>> I was told lately about this workaround, check it out. >>> https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/ >> >> The signing thing is a security feature. I don't like a workaround to >> disable a security feature inste...

...gt; Nux! > www.nux.ro > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> >> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> >> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 16:50:20 >> Subject: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage > >> Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly >> well know >> extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. >> >> From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates >> repository is >> 60.6.1-1.el7. &g...

...quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 16:50:20 > Subject: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well know > extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. > > From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates repository is > 60.6.1-1.el7. > It looks like Mozilla have just releas...

...Nux! > www.nux.ro > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> >> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> >> Sent: Friday, 10 May, 2019 05:40:38 >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage > >>> On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>>>> The price we pay.. :) >>>> >>>> Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox >>>> packages? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>>...

Hy, I had a mistake on a function of a package i have created! I have solved it and then i repackaged and installed the modified package. I use to launch R from Excel! And so when i launch R, and next call my function from the workspace, i still find the problem on my function. And when i read on my workspace, the source code of my function, i find the old version of my function (the one from the...

...uadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Friday, 10 May, 2019 05:40:38 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage >> On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>>> The price we pay.. :) >>> >>> Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox >>> packages? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Simon >>> >> >>...

firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote: > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well > know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. > > From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates > repository is 60.6.1-1.el7. It looks like Mozilla have...

cool!! that works for now.. thanks Mark!! On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:21 AM mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote: > > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well > > know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. > > > > From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates > > repository is 60.6.1-1.el7. It...

On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >> The price we pay.. :) > > Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox packages? > > Regards, > Simon > No, Red Hat have not yet released any updates for Firefox. I doubt it's a priority for them.

Hello Nux!, On Fri, 10 May 2019 10:12:59 +0100 (BST) Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading stuff from it. > > It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual desktop users and some users were using multiple IPs (dhcp), but it shows

> Am 10.05.2019 um 11:12 schrieb Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro>: >> >> I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year >> or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading >> stuff from it. >> >> It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual desktop users and >> some users were using multiple IPs

I have re-packaged xulrunner 1.9.2.26 for CentOS 5 for use with older applications which can't be run with xulrunner 10.0.4. I created 'compatibity' RPMs that can be safely installed alongside xulrunner 10.0.4. I needed it to run the Evergreen 2.1 and 2.2 Staff Clients at our local library. The RPMs are available in the Deepwoods Software repo at the URL:

Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates repository is 60.6.1-1.el7. It looks like Mozilla have just released firefox esr 60.6.2 which should fix the signing issue. (see https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/60.6.2/releasenotes/) Would it

> On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>> The price we pay.. :) >> >> Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox >> packages? >> >> Regards, >> Simon >> > > No, Red Hat have not yet released any updates for Firefox. I doubt it's > a priority for them. Which makes me believe they don't

On 11/05/19 2:05 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >> Am 10.05.2019 um 11:12 schrieb Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro>: >>> I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year >>> or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading >>> stuff from it. >>> >>> It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual

Am 10.05.2019 um 11:12 schrieb Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro>: > > I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading stuff from it. > > It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual desktop users and some users were using multiple IPs (dhcp), but it shows there are quite a few users