search for: reopts

Hello, In preparation for the LLVM public release, I've moved the reoptimizer out of the main cvs module "llvm" and into the cvs module "reopt". You can go ahead and delete the lib/Reoptimizer directory from your tree, about which cvs will undoubtedly be complaining to you. If you want to build the reoptimizer, cd into your SPARC tree's "projects"

Hello, I've closed PR106 (use automake) as WONTFIX. I've already delineated the problems with automake in previous posts but as of now, all the automake related stuff has been removed from the repository. In an effort to start making our makefile system better, I've committed changes to Makefile.rules and a few library Makefiles that nearly double the speed of our compilations. I

Hi Reid, just a quick note while you're doing this, a while ago I ran into a problem that the standard makefiles weren't building libraries (like, say, a new pass) correctly on OS X - they were being built as shared libraries and not bundles, so they couldn't be loaded with dlopen. The discussion is in the archives if you want more details... I fixed it locally by doing the following

...the same issue with 6.01, and possibly earlier versions. 2. 6.01 works slowly, but successfully. 6.02 works slowly, and fail. With both 6.01 and 6.02, hello.c32 is reporting the malloc issue. It takes a long time to run, but it does exit. In contrast to 6.01, the xp command for 6.02 reopts an ERR: Couldn't read the first disk sector I pressed ctrl+alt+del immediately afterwards. Was I wrong not to wait a few minutes before doing that? 3. The following is mostly for the record. I seldom reboot the machine. I think I have no malware. I do get MS updates for...

In preparation for Release 1.4, I've consolidated the bytecode compression to only use bzip2. zlib is not supported any more. We chose bzip2 because it offers about 10% better compression on bytecode files. Its unlikely, but this change *could* affect you if you ever built the CFE or your own LLVM project on a machine that had zlib but didn't have bzip2. If you have bzip2 on your

Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined, it is easy to maintain. This series

Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined, it is easy to maintain. This series

Hi, Here is the version 3 of NOKPORBE_SYMBOL series. Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've introduced NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined

Hi, Here is the version 3 of NOKPORBE_SYMBOL series. Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've introduced NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined