search for: renumbering

HI all, Is there a renumbering function in R? I would like to renumber the following id numbers *Input file * Id Father Mother 123 0 0 124 0 0 125 123 124 126 123 0 127 125 126 128 0 127 130 123 125 *Output* Id Father Mother 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 1 2 4 1 0 5 3 4 6 0 7 7 1 2 Any help is highly appreciated in Advance V...

Greetings R users, I am trying to renumber my groups within the file shown below. The groups are currently set as 8,9,10,etc. I would like to renumber this as 1,2,3,etc. I have searched the help files and only come across using the rownames to renumber the values but I need to match values. Any assistance is always appreciated, Regards, Charles structure(list(Group = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L,

I am having a problem with Horde due to large variations in email UID for a few users. At one time they were receiving thousands of emails a day, they have deleted all these messages but because they still have early emails in the mailbox the UID range from start to now is massive. We use Horde webmail and it creates an internal array based on range of messages but due to large UID range it eats

Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 0.99.14-1 Severity: important Hi, I think I've identified a bug in Dovecot 0.99.14 as packaged and distributed by Debian Sarge. I believe the bug lies in the original Dovecot source, not with any modifications made by Debian. Specifically, this bug deals with Dovecot's handling of message unique identifiers (UIDs) for IMAP clients when using the mbox

Am 2016-12-18 um 22:50 schrieb Ricardo Branco: > I am having a problem with Horde due to large variations in email UID > for a few users. > At one time they were receiving thousands of emails a day, they have > deleted all these messages but because they still have early emails in > the mailbox the UID range from start to now is massive. > We use Horde webmail and it creates an

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, David McBride wrote: > Package: dovecot-imapd > Version: 0.99.14-1 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > I think I've identified a bug in Dovecot 0.99.14 as packaged and > distributed by Debian Sarge. I believe the bug lies in the original > Dovecot source, not with any modifications made by Debian. > > Specifically, this bug deals with

Hello everyone, I just wrote a little utility called "numergrate" (short for numerate migration files). I think it can be useful for a lot people who are using Rails to move migration files around. You can do ruby script/ numergate 50 before 30 to move migration file #50 to position 29. The utility is also integrated with subversion via the svn client. Please give it a shot and

...terfere with proper playing, but does anyone have > a suggestion for a simple fix here? I suppose I just need to renumber > the pages? Well, it's a warning for a reason; the file is still valid and will play, it's just telling you some data is missing compared to the original encode. Renumbering the pages (and fixing the crc's after the change) would remove the warning, if that's what you want. Cool that you've gotten them fixed! -r

Hi all, I need to be able to delete a voicemail message using a program. Is is sufficient to simply delete the .wav and .txt files in the spool directory? Or do I need to also renumber the remaining files? For example, let say a given mailbox has 20 messages in it and I want to delete message number 5. Can I just delete the 2 files and expect that asterisk will renumber them? Or do I

...ence goes to s,5. I keep dialing from that particular number (the one in the example is clearly masked as a false CID), and verified it's showing up as that number on callerID. Also one last question. Say I need to add more numbers to block in the future, is there an easier way to do this than renumbering my entire macro? Renumbering everything is just begging for a typo which can effectively render my dial plan broken. Thank you kindly, everyone! - sf

I threw together a web gui for the static database configuration over the last couple of days. I built it using mod perl and the template toolkit. If enough people show an interest in this I'll put up a distribution, although it could take a few days. The interface is as generic as possible so you can throw pretty much any asterisk .conf file in and it works. The interface assumes you

...def CALLv3 : JInst<(outs), (ins calltarget:$dst), "call $dst", []>, Requires<[HasV3T]>; } CALLv3 <ga:@printf>, %D0<imp-def,dead>, %D1<imp-def,dead>, %D2<imp-def,dead>, %R31<imp-def>, %R0<imp-use,kill>, ... Another clue - slot renumbering just took place: *** Renumbered SlotIndexes 1056-2120 *** ... *** Renumbered SlotIndexes 1068-2140 *** ...and the first move after that produces the assert. (gdb) p Start.dump() 1080r (gdb) p B->end.dump() 1092r (gdb) p *LR.valno $7 = {id = 61, def = {lie = {Value = 74160402}}} (gdb) p *B-&g...

ogg.k.ogg.k at googlemail.com wrote, on 7/14/2009 7:16 AM: >> easy to replace. The second packet is the metadata, which we can lose. >> It's just the third packet that needs to be reconstructed. After that, >> you could start at any packet division in the rest of the file and it >> would play fine? So this generic restore tool that I'm positing would >> just

But, the branch folding pass, or whatever passes are supposed to reorder the blocks based on the CFG, are not doing so in this case. Otherwise there is no way that blocks 2 and 4 should be printing out before blocks 3 & 5. Renumber blocks just seems to reorder the values based on their pre-set block number, but when the CFG is modified these number should modified also to follow the new

Here is something I wrote years ago. I expect you can adjust it for your needs # cat remove_blank_vmail #!/bin/bash # remove_blank_vmail takes arguments as voicemail boxes and removes messages with audio files shorter then MINSIZE (in bytes) #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Description: # Author: John Harragin Monroe-Woodbury CSD # Created at: Thu Nov 6

...lt;<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Needs to move above 28B 96B %vreg37<def> = LDriw <fi#-8>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-8] IntRegs:%vreg37 In Hexagon %D1==%R0:R1 (double reg), %D2==%R2:R3 etc. The MI move triggers liveness update, which first triggers SlotIndex renumbering: *** Renumbered SlotIndexes 24-56 *** So my 48B becomes 56B, so after the update new live ranges look like this: R2 = [0B,56r:0)[352r,416r:5)... R3 = [0B,56r:0)[368r,416r:5)... R4 = [0B,48r:0)[384r,416r:4)... R5 = [0B,48r:0)[400r,416r:4)... Then in LiveIntervals::handleMove OldIndex 56B and New...

As stated in an earlier email, I am working on getting break/continue to work correctly for my backend, but I ran into another issue with codegen and the CFG. It seems that code gen is not done based on the CFG, but rather on the block numbers, and the function call MachineFunction::RenumberBlocks doesn't renumber the blocks based on the CFG. So how can I modify the CFG so that when codegen

...lt;<<<<< Needs to move above 28B > 96B %vreg37<def> = LDriw <fi#-8>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-8] > IntRegs:%vreg37 > > In Hexagon %D1==%R0:R1 (double reg), %D2==%R2:R3 etc. > The MI move triggers liveness update, which first triggers SlotIndex > renumbering: > > *** Renumbered SlotIndexes 24-56 *** > > So my 48B becomes 56B, so after the update new live ranges look like this: > > R2 = [0B,56r:0)[352r,416r:5)... > R3 = [0B,56r:0)[368r,416r:5)... > R4 = [0B,48r:0)[384r,416r:4)... > R5 = [0B,48r:0)[400r,416r:4)... > > The...

Hi, Dovecot (at least versions 0.99.10.4, 0.99.11, 1.0rc15, rc17 and rc18) allows message Unique Identifiers to be an unsigned 32 bit value, so something like "X-UID: 4085788205" is allowed. Some IMAP clients I've tested (Thunderbird 1.5.0.9, SquirrelMail 1.4.9a/PHP 4.3.2) appear to use signed 32 bit identifiers and request the above message as UID 2147483647 (max signed 32 bit

On Aug 13, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Andy, > > Yes, this is what Arnold has suggested also, and from this point it looks > like it should work, but it will require parsing the bundle every time we > care to know whether this is a real use or a conditional def. This might > become awkward... but I guess I should provide a better