search for: renicing

Hi all, Is it possible to use the 'renice' option together with parallel clusters of type 'PSOCK'? The help page for parallel::makeCluster is not specific about which options are supported on which types and I am getting the following message when passing renice = 19 : > cl <- parallel::makeCluster(2, renice = 19) nice: ?+19?: No such file or directory Kind regards,

Looks like a bug to me due to wrong assumptions about 'nice' arguments, but could be because a "non-standard" 'nice' is used. If we do: > trace(system, tracer = quote(print(command))) Tracing function "system" in package "base" we see that the system call used is: > cl <- parallel::makePSOCKcluster(2L, renice = 19) Tracing system(cmd, wait

Hi Henrik, Thanks for the detailed in fast reply! My guess would be that the confusion comes from the different use of nice and renice. The workraund you provided work fine! Thanks a lot. Best, Andreas Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> writes: > Looks like a bug to me due to wrong assumptions about 'nice' > arguments, but could be because a

http://perso.wanadoo.es/priotc/ <mailto:priotc_ at hotmail.com> PRIOTC Priority Task Controller for HP-UX 9000 B.10.20 or higher systems. Version is1.4a Author: Enrique Moliner Martinez, from Zaragoza (Spain) See also "top" unix program. -This is an automatic renicer program: Get more CPU time to processes NOT matching names or patterns in this file (normally

http://perso.wanadoo.es/priotc/ PRIOTC with source FREE_ENDUSER license Author: Enrique Moliner Martinez, from Zaragoza (Spain) Version is download file name. Automatic HP-UX pid renicer and serializer For use in HP-9000 (others?) unix systems with 'HP-UX' B.10.20 or higher This is a configurable 'automatic renicer' program: Get variable CPU time to pids depending on defined

PRIOTC Author: Enrique Moliner Martinez, from Zaragoza (Spain) version 1.5 (2/1/2007) with FREE_ENDUSER license version 1.4.a have a bug, only if missing config label values. Automatic HP-UX pid renicer and serializer For use in HP-9000 (others?) unix systems with 'HP-UX' B.10.20 or higher This is an 'automatic renicer' program: Get variable CPU time to pids depending on

<mailto:priotc_ at hotmail.com> PRIOTC Author: Enrique Moliner Martinez, from Zaragoza (Spain) version 1.5a (1/2/2007) with FREE_ENDUSER license Bugs fixed and changes. Soon version 1.6 also with patterns for cmd parameters. Automatic HP-UX pid renicer and serializer For use in HP-9000 (others?) unix systems with 'HP-UX' B.10.20 or higher This is an 'automatic renicer'

Hi, for a job of lesser priority I would like to connect to a Samba server. When I'm doing a 'smbmount', enter the server by SSH, pgrep for the new smbd process and then renice it I have exactly the behaviour I desire. Now I would like to automate this and yet start the server process with lower priority. Connections to other clients shall not be touched at all. Are there any

I have 4 gig in my * box. I'm tuning for performance and I'd like to ask opinions: 1. asterisk -p == renice -20 ?? 2. I've turned off swap with no apparent ill effects. Can anyone commment on long term effects with moderate load (say, 30 SIP phones / 2-3K calls /day) 3. Can anyone comment on using ramdisk as swap and whether this is a good idea or bad idea? I'm using 2.6

I'm thinking of writing some sort of SUID wrapper for ogg123 that will always run it at maximum priority for use with mpg123.el on my Linux system. I just wanted to check first that I am not duplicating efforts here. Has anyone already written a tool like this? --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this

By default asterisk (on my system) runs with NICE value "0" like most of the programs. Will the performance improve if I assign NICE value of let say -5 or -10 to asterisk? To my understanding it should as the priority will be higher than most other programs (it might even solve some echo problem). Am I right? How to start asterisk with priority let say -5? If I start the main process

I wonder if someone could point me to the appropriate docs for my question? If I would like to cause my system to always start 'smbd' processes at priority 7 for example, how would I go about doing that. I'm assuming there's a better way than running a cronjob every minute to renice existing processes. I'd appreciate some help pointing me in the right direction. Thanks.

...much more strick. I don't mind if X is a little less responsive (even alot less responsive), but I would really like to be able to run X on a server with a PRI. Is there any way to reduce X11's priority so that it doesn't interfere with the zaptel driver for the PRI... I've tried renicing X as far down as I can and renicing Asterisk up as far as I can, however I fear this won't ever fix the problem since I think the actual kernel module that is running the pri card needs to get higher priority (ie, the kernel itself needs higher priority). Is there any way to do this? Am I cor...

I have configured 2x 500G sata HDD as Software RAID1 with three partitions md0,md1 and md2 with md2 as 400+ gigs Now it is almost 36 hours the status is cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 hdb1[1] hda1[0] 104320 blocks [2/2] [UU] resync=DELAYED md1 : active raid1 hdb2[1] hda2[0] 4096448 blocks [2/2] [UU] resync=DELAYED md2 : active raid1

Had a good question for the list, it seems whenever I work in an Asterisk console or on the machine normally I get jitters on any audio going through it. Especially if you did file copies or a 'ps ax' for example. I was wondering if there was a proper way to 'nice' the asterisk proc's? Cisco does this for example to it's "EXEC" and icmp processes, I tried

Sorry again for the only marginal relation to asterisk, but the issue does affect the voice performance I am experiencing, so I am soothing my guilt with that. Bet you don't see this every day: ast% uptime 13:48:08 up 981 days, 18:29, 1 user, load average: 1.08, 1.02, 1.01 ast% I *REALLY* want this machine to see 1000 days uptime, if for nothing other than bragging rights. Its been

...with the 2.4.22. The problem is that the games is very fast but it's not smooth, once a second it'll block for some millseconds but this not happen always and not with the same frequency... this happens the same with or without kernel preemption. After some tryes I've discovered that renicing the "wineserve" process to a a low priority (for example +19) correct this problem and the game become very smooth and fast... Someone know why ???? I'm using the nvidia closed source drivers with the nvidia GLX acceleration. I don't know if this happend Bye -- Simone

Hi everyone! I was wondering... Does the musiconhold quality improve if the mpg123 processes run with a negative priority? If so, is there a way to make them start like that, so I don't have to renice them? Regards, Evert

Hi, I have unpleasent short audio gaps when a perl based agi scripts starts. Thus, I now started to put all those things in C programmed daemons for fast-agi. Anyway I'm looking for another mean, which would help me more quickly. I noticed, that all agi scripts are running with system priority -11, like asterisk does. This is really waste of priority. I would like to have the AGI scripts

I have had no success in getting the voicemail working on Asterisk 1.2.11 on CENTOS4(2.6 kernel) guest on vmware server 1.0.1. I tried with or without ztdummy device, renice -20 on asterisk process and even real-time priority on the host Windows XP box for the vmware process. I am running on an AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+. The behaviour is when the voicemail answer, the voice sound ok but when