search for: remv

Le 16/02/2015 20:40, Casey Stone a ?crit : > On Feb 13, 2015, at 3:42 PM, FUSTE Emmanuel <emmanuel.fuste at thalesgroup.com> wrote: > >> Le 13/02/2015 16:19, Casey Stone a ?crit : >>> On Feb 5, 2015, at 10:39 PM, Casey Stone <tcstone at caseystone.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello: >>>> >>>> I've been looking forward to

In case of OS X 10.9 and later, any file could not be removed. $ rm test.txt rm: test.txt: Resource busy cannot remove: OS X 10.11.2 El Capitan OS X 10.10.5 Yosemite OS X 10.9.5 Mavericks can remove: OS X 10.8.5 Mountain Lion OS X 10.7.5 Lion OS X 10.6.8 Snow Leopard Windows 7 Environment: Fedora rawhide samba-4.3.3-0.fc24 smb.conf: [global] workgroup = LOCALNET server string

...arently nothing requires it: The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libverto-libevent1 libverto1 Use 'apt autoremove' to remove them. The following packages will be REMOVED: krb5-kdc 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 21 not upgraded. Remv krb5-kdc [1.16-2ubuntu0.1] I checked in apt history log and the package was installed manually, it's in the "Verified package dependencies" script for Ubuntu 18.04 [1] [1] https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required_to_Build_Samba#Verified_Package_Dependencies -...

...following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: > libverto-libevent1 libverto1 > Use 'apt autoremove' to remove them. > The following packages will be REMOVED: > krb5-kdc > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 21 not upgraded. > Remv krb5-kdc [1.16-2ubuntu0.1] Please remove it, you do not need it. Do you know that you can get ready built packages here: http://apt.van-belle.nl/ > I checked in apt history log and the package was installed manually, it's in the "Verified package dependencies" script for Ubuntu...

Hi, Am running SAMBA 3.0.4 on RHEL 3.0 ( 2.4.21-9.ELsmp ) It was running fine till today when i restarted my server and started getting this nmbd log!! I might have overlooked, but if anyone could point me to any previous post with answers or any other link please mail me or if there is something new or anything more you want to help me solve this, please let me know. Any help is greatly

...ing = native >> streams_xattr:prefix = user. >> streams_xattr:store_stream_type = no >> ea support = yes >> >> >> If "fruit:locking = netatalk" line is deleted, there is no problem. > > What happens if you keep the locking but remve the streams_xattr > options? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- [global] workgroup = LOCALNET server string = %h dos charset = CP932 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 security = user passdb backend = smbpasswd load printers = yes...

> Not sure, but that is the way it looks, just a thought, are you using > sssd ? no, not even installed > Just like a normal share, '[homes]' is a special share that doesn't use > 'path. There used to be something on the wiki about using '[home]' on a > DC, I didn't know it had gone until you mentioned it ;-) So if I use [home] it would be a normal

I have a troubling circumstance. I've installed a new domain member running Slackware64 14.2. This computer is practically a clone of another domain member I've had set up and running for over a year. Most everything seems to work. I have joined the domain and it does show up as a domain computer. The domain user can log onto the computer just fine. I can run `wbinfo -u`, `wbinfo -g` and

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1402 Summary: [RFE] Support auditing through Linux Audit subsystem Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: patch Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd