Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "removeunusedmdnod".
Did you mean:
removeunusedmdnodes
2013 Nov 13
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal: release MDNodes for source modules (LTO+debug info)
...r example Xalan used
649MB for MDNodes after loading and linking, but the actual destination
module only has 393MB of MDNodes. There are 649-393MB (40% of 649MB) not
used.
MDNodes belong to the Context, deleting modules will not release the
MDNodes.
One possible solution is:
In LLVMContext, add “removeUnusedMDNodes" function
It goes through OwnedModules and check if a MDNode is used by any of the
modules, if not remove it.
One implementation is to mark a visited MDNode used when traversing the
module. After done traversing all modules, we can delete MDNodes in
MDNodeSet that are not marked.
In LTO...
2013 Nov 13
3
[LLVMdev] Proposal: release MDNodes for source modules (LTO+debug info)
...al
>> destination module only has 393MB of MDNodes. There are 649-393MB (40% of
>> 649MB) not used.
>>
>> MDNodes belong to the Context, deleting modules will not release the
>> MDNodes.
>>
>> One possible solution is:
>>
>> In LLVMContext, add “removeUnusedMDNodes" function
>> It goes through OwnedModules and check if a MDNode is used by any of
>> the modules, if not remove it.
>> One implementation is to mark a visited MDNode used when traversing the
>> module. After done traversing all modules, we can delete MDNodes in
&g...
2013 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal: release MDNodes for source modules (LTO+debug info)
...er loading and linking, but the actual
> destination module only has 393MB of MDNodes. There are 649-393MB (40% of
> 649MB) not used.
>
> MDNodes belong to the Context, deleting modules will not release the
> MDNodes.
>
> One possible solution is:
>
> In LLVMContext, add “removeUnusedMDNodes" function
> It goes through OwnedModules and check if a MDNode is used by any of the
> modules, if not remove it.
> One implementation is to mark a visited MDNode used when traversing the
> module. After done traversing all modules, we can delete MDNodes in
> MDNodeSet tha...
2013 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal: release MDNodes for source modules (LTO+debug info)
...nly has 393MB of MDNodes. There are 649-393MB (40% of
>>> 649MB) not used.
>>>
>>> MDNodes belong to the Context, deleting modules will not release the
>>> MDNodes.
>>>
>>> One possible solution is:
>>>
>>> In LLVMContext, add “removeUnusedMDNodes" function
>>> It goes through OwnedModules and check if a MDNode is used by any of
>>> the modules, if not remove it.
>>> One implementation is to mark a visited MDNode used when traversing
>>> the module. After done traversing all modules, we can dele...
2013 Nov 13
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal: release MDNodes for source modules (LTO+debug info)
...are 649-393MB (40% of
>>>> 649MB) not used.
>>>>
>>>> MDNodes belong to the Context, deleting modules will not release the
>>>> MDNodes.
>>>>
>>>> One possible solution is:
>>>>
>>>> In LLVMContext, add “removeUnusedMDNodes" function
>>>> It goes through OwnedModules and check if a MDNode is used by any of
>>>> the modules, if not remove it.
>>>> One implementation is to mark a visited MDNode used when traversing
>>>> the module. After done traversing all modu...
2013 Nov 13
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal: release MDNodes for source modules (LTO+debug info)
...v 12, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> Other options are:
> 1> Using a different LLVMContext for the destination module, but it didn’t work out since Linker was not designed to work with different LLVMContexts for source vs destination.
> 2> removeUnusedMDNodes checks if a MDNode is used in a different way (i.e use_empty() && !hasValueHandler()), but it does not remove MDNodes that form cycles.
>
> 3) Make the MDNode be owned by the module that uses it?
>
> MDNode is shared among modules so multiple modules can use it, if we spec...
2013 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal: release MDNodes for source modules (LTO+debug info)
...>
> wrote:
>
> Other options are:
>>>> 1> Using a different LLVMContext for the destination module, but it
>>>> didn’t work out since Linker was not designed to work with different
>>>> LLVMContexts for source vs destination.
>>>> 2> removeUnusedMDNodes checks if a MDNode is used in a different way
>>>> (i.e use_empty() && !hasValueHandler()), but it does not remove MDNodes
>>>> that form cycles.
>>>>
>>>
>>> 3) Make the MDNode be owned by the module that uses it?
>>>
>&g...