Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "removemethod".
Did you mean:
remove_method
2005 Jan 30
1
S4 packages and .Rdata file.
Dear developers.
Have spend just 1 h searching for a bug in a new version of a new
version of a package.
I was getting a segfault all the time. "Funny" thing - there was no
error neither in the S nor in the C code.
To solve the problem I had to delete the .Rdata file!
What I observed. If the .Rdata file was generated while a previous
release of a package was installed in the
2009 Jun 11
0
S4 Package with definition of method 'names'
...However 'R CMD check ' for building a package fails with
Error in setMethod(f, signature, NULL, where = where) :
the method for function "names" and signature ="" is sealed and cannot
be re-defined
Calls: <Anonymous> ... sys.source -> eval -> eval -> removeMethod ->
setMethod
Execution halted
make[2]: *** [lazyload] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make: *** [pkg-DAP] Error 2
This is somewhat confusing since it works nicely if pasted into R.
Any Ideas
Thank you for your time
Thomas Roth
2009 Jun 15
1
S4: Bug in group method defenition ("Compare")
...] TRUE FALSE
selectMethod(">=",c(class(2),class(o)),optional=T) ### Shows real
method!!!!!
#function (e1, e2)
#{
# callGeneric(e1, e2 at range)
#}
#
#Signatures:
# e1 e2
#target "numeric" "foo"
#defined "ANY" "foo"
removeMethod("Compare",c(e1="ANY",e2="foo"))
#[1] TRUE
2>o
##Called from: 2 > o ### What?? Even after removing method the first
defined
### method is still there!!!!
#Browse[1]>
#[1] TRUE FALSE
I tried this under Windows Xp in 2.8 and 2.9.0.
Vitalie.
2010 Feb 26
2
New methods for generic functions show and print : some visible with ls(), some not
Dear all,
I'm trying to understand the S4 way of object-oriented programming, but I
still can't grasp completely what R is doing. I have a class definition for
a class called PM10Meteo, and I set a initializer function. next, I include
a show method and a print method as shown below.
setClass( Class="PM10Meteo",...) # end setClass
setMethod
2006 May 22
2
confused by inheritance...
Hi r-devels,
I am stuck in some S4 inheritance problem:
setClass("A",representation(a="numeric"))
setClass("A1",representation(b="numeric"),contains="A")
setClass("A2",representation(c="numeric"),contains="A1")
if(!isGeneric("foo")){
setGeneric("foo", function(x,y,z, ...)
2003 Apr 16
2
R-1.7.0 is released
...g zero col/row matrices correctly.
(PR#2541 was one symptom.)
o approx() and approxfun() now work with 1 knot if
method = "constant". stepfun(), ecdf() and plot.stepfun() do so
as well.
o AIC.lm/default was failing if multiple objects and k were
specified. (PR#2518)
o removeMethods{methods} was broken. (PR#2519)
o summary.glm() had two `aic' components in the returned object.
o autoload() was returning the value of its last command, a
promise, even though it was documented to have no value.
As a result some packages (e.g. nlme) were loading packages
they mea...
2003 Apr 16
2
R-1.7.0 is released
...g zero col/row matrices correctly.
(PR#2541 was one symptom.)
o approx() and approxfun() now work with 1 knot if
method = "constant". stepfun(), ecdf() and plot.stepfun() do so
as well.
o AIC.lm/default was failing if multiple objects and k were
specified. (PR#2518)
o removeMethods{methods} was broken. (PR#2519)
o summary.glm() had two `aic' components in the returned object.
o autoload() was returning the value of its last command, a
promise, even though it was documented to have no value.
As a result some packages (e.g. nlme) were loading packages
they mea...