search for: remove_vqs

...@@ -1945,17 +1949,22 @@ static const struct file_operations portdev_fops = { .owner = THIS_MODULE, }; +static void remove_vq(struct virtqueue *vq) +{ + struct port_buffer *buf; + + flush_bufs(vq, true); + while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq))) + free_buf(buf, true); +} + static void remove_vqs(struct ports_device *portdev) { struct virtqueue *vq; - virtio_device_for_each_vq(portdev->vdev, vq) { - struct port_buffer *buf; + virtio_device_for_each_vq(portdev->vdev, vq) + remove_vq(vq); - flush_bufs(vq, true); - while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq))) - free_buf(b...

...@@ -1945,17 +1949,22 @@ static const struct file_operations portdev_fops = { .owner = THIS_MODULE, }; +static void remove_vq(struct virtqueue *vq) +{ + struct port_buffer *buf; + + flush_bufs(vq, true); + while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq))) + free_buf(buf, true); +} + static void remove_vqs(struct ports_device *portdev) { struct virtqueue *vq; - virtio_device_for_each_vq(portdev->vdev, vq) { - struct port_buffer *buf; + virtio_device_for_each_vq(portdev->vdev, vq) + remove_vq(vq); - flush_bufs(vq, true); - while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq))) - free_buf(b...

...@@ -1945,17 +1949,22 @@ static const struct file_operations portdev_fops = { .owner = THIS_MODULE, }; +static void remove_vq(struct virtqueue *vq) +{ + struct port_buffer *buf; + + flush_bufs(vq, true); + while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq))) + free_buf(buf, true); +} + static void remove_vqs(struct ports_device *portdev) { struct virtqueue *vq; - virtio_device_for_each_vq(portdev->vdev, vq) { - struct port_buffer *buf; + virtio_device_for_each_vq(portdev->vdev, vq) + remove_vq(vq); - flush_bufs(vq, true); - while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq))) - free_buf(b...

...ev_fops = { > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > }; > > +static void remove_vq(struct virtqueue *vq) > +{ > + struct port_buffer *buf; > + > + flush_bufs(vq, true); > + while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq))) > + free_buf(buf, true); > +} > + > static void remove_vqs(struct ports_device *portdev) > { > struct virtqueue *vq; > > - virtio_device_for_each_vq(portdev->vdev, vq) { > - struct port_buffer *buf; > + virtio_device_for_each_vq(portdev->vdev, vq) > + remove_vq(vq); > > - flush_bufs(vq, true); > - while ((buf...

...t_data(port); + remove_unused_bufs(port->in_vq); spin_unlock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock); spin_lock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); reclaim_consumed_buffers(port); + remove_unused_bufs(port->out_vq); spin_unlock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); } @@ -1950,11 +1960,9 @@ static void remove_vqs(struct ports_device *portdev) struct virtqueue *vq; virtio_device_for_each_vq(portdev->vdev, vq) { - struct port_buffer *buf; flush_bufs(vq, true); - while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq))) - free_buf(buf, true); + remove_unused_bufs(vq); } portdev->vdev->config...

...t_data(port); + remove_unused_bufs(port->in_vq); spin_unlock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock); spin_lock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); reclaim_consumed_buffers(port); + remove_unused_bufs(port->out_vq); spin_unlock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); } @@ -1950,11 +1960,9 @@ static void remove_vqs(struct ports_device *portdev) struct virtqueue *vq; virtio_device_for_each_vq(portdev->vdev, vq) { - struct port_buffer *buf; flush_bufs(vq, true); - while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq))) - free_buf(buf, true); + remove_unused_bufs(vq); } portdev->vdev->config...

Turns out virtio console tries to take a buffer out of an active vq. Works by sheer luck, and is explicitly forbidden by spec. And while going over it I saw that error handling is also broken - failure is easy to trigger if I force allocations to fail. Lightly tested. Michael S. Tsirkin (6): virtio_console: don't tie bufs to a vq virtio: add ability to iterate over vqs virtio_console:

Turns out virtio console tries to take a buffer out of an active vq. Works by sheer luck, and is explicitly forbidden by spec. And while going over it I saw that error handling is also broken - failure is easy to trigger if I force allocations to fail. Lightly tested. Michael S. Tsirkin (6): virtio_console: don't tie bufs to a vq virtio: add ability to iterate over vqs virtio_console:

...cause buffers for the in_vq are allocated when the port is added but are not released when the port is unplugged. They are only released when virtconsole is removed (see a7a69ec0d8e4) To avoid the problem and to be symmetric, we could allocate all the buffers in init_vqs() as they are released in remove_vqs(), but it sounds like a waste of memory. Rather than that, this patch changes add_port() logic to only allocate the buffers if the in_vq has available free slots. Fixes: a7a69ec0d8e4 ("virtio_console: free buffers after reset") Cc: mst at redhat.com Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvi...

...cause buffers for the in_vq are allocated when the port is added but are not released when the port is unplugged. They are only released when virtconsole is removed (see a7a69ec0d8e4) To avoid the problem and to be symmetric, we could allocate all the buffers in init_vqs() as they are released in remove_vqs(), but it sounds like a waste of memory. Rather than that, this patch changes add_port() logic to only allocate the buffers if the in_vq has available free slots. Fixes: a7a69ec0d8e4 ("virtio_console: free buffers after reset") Cc: mst at redhat.com Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvi...

...ort is >> added but are not released when the port is unplugged. >> >> They are only released when virtconsole is removed (see a7a69ec0d8e4) >> >> To avoid the problem and to be symmetric, we could allocate all the buffers >> in init_vqs() as they are released in remove_vqs(), but it sounds like >> a waste of memory. >> >> Rather than that, this patch changes add_port() logic to only allocate the >> buffers if the in_vq has available free slots. >> >> Fixes: a7a69ec0d8e4 ("virtio_console: free buffers after reset") >&gt...

...ort is >> added but are not released when the port is unplugged. >> >> They are only released when virtconsole is removed (see a7a69ec0d8e4) >> >> To avoid the problem and to be symmetric, we could allocate all the buffers >> in init_vqs() as they are released in remove_vqs(), but it sounds like >> a waste of memory. >> >> Rather than that, this patch changes add_port() logic to only allocate the >> buffers if the in_vq has available free slots. >> >> Fixes: a7a69ec0d8e4 ("virtio_console: free buffers after reset") >&gt...

...> > spin_lock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); > > reclaim_consumed_buffers(port); > > + remove_unused_bufs(port->out_vq); > > spin_unlock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); > > } > > > > @@ -1950,11 +1960,9 @@ static void remove_vqs(struct ports_device *portdev) > > struct virtqueue *vq; > > > > virtio_device_for_each_vq(portdev->vdev, vq) { > > - struct port_buffer *buf; > > > > flush_bufs(vq, true); > > - while (...

...> > spin_lock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); > > reclaim_consumed_buffers(port); > > + remove_unused_bufs(port->out_vq); > > spin_unlock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); > > } > > > > @@ -1950,11 +1960,9 @@ static void remove_vqs(struct ports_device *portdev) > > struct virtqueue *vq; > > > > virtio_device_for_each_vq(portdev->vdev, vq) { > > - struct port_buffer *buf; > > > > flush_bufs(vq, true); > > - while (...

...gt; > added but are not released when the port is unplugged. > > > > They are only released when virtconsole is removed (see a7a69ec0d8e4) > > > > To avoid the problem and to be symmetric, we could allocate all the buffers > > in init_vqs() as they are released in remove_vqs(), but it sounds like > > a waste of memory. > > > > Rather than that, this patch changes add_port() logic to ignore ENOSPC > > error in fill_queue(), which means queue has already been filled. > > > > Fixes: a7a69ec0d8e4 ("virtio_console: free buffers aft...

...gt; > added but are not released when the port is unplugged. > > > > They are only released when virtconsole is removed (see a7a69ec0d8e4) > > > > To avoid the problem and to be symmetric, we could allocate all the buffers > > in init_vqs() as they are released in remove_vqs(), but it sounds like > > a waste of memory. > > > > Rather than that, this patch changes add_port() logic to ignore ENOSPC > > error in fill_queue(), which means queue has already been filled. > > > > Fixes: a7a69ec0d8e4 ("virtio_console: free buffers aft...

...n_vq); > spin_unlock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock); > > spin_lock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); > reclaim_consumed_buffers(port); > + remove_unused_bufs(port->out_vq); > spin_unlock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); > } > > @@ -1938,11 +1948,9 @@ static void remove_vqs(struct ports_device *portdev) > struct virtqueue *vq; > > virtio_device_for_each_vq(portdev->vdev, vq) { > - struct port_buffer *buf; > > flush_bufs(vq, true); > - while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq))) > - free_buf(buf, true); > + remove_unuse...

...n_vq); > spin_unlock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock); > > spin_lock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); > reclaim_consumed_buffers(port); > + remove_unused_bufs(port->out_vq); > spin_unlock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); > } > > @@ -1938,11 +1948,9 @@ static void remove_vqs(struct ports_device *portdev) > struct virtqueue *vq; > > virtio_device_for_each_vq(portdev->vdev, vq) { > - struct port_buffer *buf; > > flush_bufs(vq, true); > - while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq))) > - free_buf(buf, true); > + remove_unuse...

...cause buffers for the in_vq are allocated when the port is added but are not released when the port is unplugged. They are only released when virtconsole is removed (see a7a69ec0d8e4) To avoid the problem and to be symmetric, we could allocate all the buffers in init_vqs() as they are released in remove_vqs(), but it sounds like a waste of memory. Rather than that, this patch changes add_port() logic to ignore ENOSPC error in fill_queue(), which means queue has already been filled. Fixes: a7a69ec0d8e4 ("virtio_console: free buffers after reset") Cc: mst at redhat.com Cc: stable at vger.ker...

...cause buffers for the in_vq are allocated when the port is added but are not released when the port is unplugged. They are only released when virtconsole is removed (see a7a69ec0d8e4) To avoid the problem and to be symmetric, we could allocate all the buffers in init_vqs() as they are released in remove_vqs(), but it sounds like a waste of memory. Rather than that, this patch changes add_port() logic to ignore ENOSPC error in fill_queue(), which means queue has already been filled. Fixes: a7a69ec0d8e4 ("virtio_console: free buffers after reset") Cc: mst at redhat.com Cc: stable at vger.ker...