Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "remove_at".
2012 Jul 07
1
[LLVMdev] Problem in LLVM CMake modules
...list(APPEND processed ${lib})
# Find the maximum index that doesn't have to be re-processed:
- while(NOT "${expanded_components}" MATCHES "^${processed}.*" )
+ while(NOT "${expanded_components}" MATCHES "^${processed}(;)|(.*)")
list(REMOVE_AT processed -1)
endwhile()
list(LENGTH processed cursor)
However, using "all" as the component to be linked is still broken, as
it passes to the linker -lLTO_static and -lprofile_rt-static, which are
non-existant libraries on a static build.
On the case of LTO_static the fix pr...
2012 Aug 03
1
[LLVMdev] Problem in LLVM CMake modules
...# Find the maximum index that doesn't have to be re-processed:
> />/ - while(NOT "${expanded_components}" MATCHES "^${processed}.*" )
> />/ + while(NOT "${expanded_components}" MATCHES "^${processed}(;)|(.*)")
> />/ list(REMOVE_AT processed -1)
> />/ endwhile()
> />/ list(LENGTH processed cursor)
> /
> The patch above doesn't make any sense. This looks more correct:
>
> --- a/cmake/modules/LLVM-Config.cmake
> +++ b/cmake/modules/LLVM-Config.cmake
> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ function(ex...
2012 Jul 07
0
[LLVMdev] Problem in LLVM CMake modules
Eli Gottlieb <eligottlieb at gmail.com> writes:
> I'm trying to upgrade my LLVM bindings in Java from 2.9 to 3.1. To
> do so, I regenerated the JNI bindings from fresh LLVM 3.1 headers, and
> did a slight rewrite of my CMakeLists.txt file for building the C
> code.
>
> Problem is, cmake no longer finishes at all. I receive the
> following output, and then
2012 Jul 07
2
[LLVMdev] Problem in LLVM CMake modules
Hi again,
I'm trying to upgrade my LLVM bindings in Java from 2.9 to 3.1. To
do so, I regenerated the JNI bindings from fresh LLVM 3.1 headers, and
did a slight rewrite of my CMakeLists.txt file for building the C code.
Problem is, cmake no longer finishes at all. I receive the
following output, and then it just runs forever (while still responding
to a CTRL-C):
> eli at