search for: remotedomains

I haven't been successful in getting this to work. The issue looks to be that Asterisk is wanting peer authentication for the invite request as it sends back 401 Unauthorized. I am using FreePBX 2.7 and have tested both Asterisk 1.6.1.18 and 1.6.2.9. My trunk settings are type=peer transport=tcp qualify=yes insecure=port,invite host=10.10.1.31 context=from-internal Here is snippets of the

Hi I'm trying to make a Linux server (RHEL 5.3) join my company's ADS domain. The company's domain is built from serveral kerberos realms and Windows domain. the Linux FQDN resolves to the name of one of the kerberos realms we have, but I was asked to to have the linux server join a different kerberos realm and windows Domain. When I attempt to run the command: 'net ads join -U

Dear List, I?m trying to figure out *memory page sharing***using HVM on Xen 4.0.1, but I?m not really able to find some useful information or sources about this issue. I just found two links porviding these sources: http://knol.google.com/k/learning-grant-tables http://blog.chinaunix.net/space.php?uid=20286427&do=blog&id=109114 Both are not working.. I think they are made for an older

Now I have a some time to answer, maybe a few of your questions. Am 26.02.19 um 20:59 schrieb lists via samba: > Hi, > > No replies unfortunately. Unsure why. There are still a lot of questions open and I think a lot of things have to be done. > > We searched the list, and we found little discussion on the subject of > trusts. We see occasional questions, but they are often

Hi, Having read the release notes on the status of trusts within samba, we see for 4.9 > "improved support for trusted domains" but we also always see these messages: > "Both sides of the trust need to fully trust each other!" and > "DCs of domain A can grant domain admin rights in domain B" What we would like to achieve is a one-way incoming trust

There was a discussion a while ago about adding inheritance to definitions. There is a need for a way to specialize parameters while allowing passing other options. This comes up with remotefile where it would be nice to have a default server location but not specify all the parameters (and their defaults) in the definition. Was there a change to the syntax? Is there a way to accomplish this?

...ome2 /usr/local/apache/conf /var/named /usr/local/cpanel /var/lib/mysql /var/lib/pgsql /var/cpanel /usr/share/ssl /var/ssl /usr/local/cpanel/3rdparty/mailman /var/log/bandwidth /usr/local/frontpage /var/spool/cron /root/.my.cnf /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf /etc/sysconfig/network /etc/userdomains /etc/remotedomains /etc/localdomains /etc/trueuserdomains /etc/trueuserowners /var/cpanel/users /etc/secondarymx /etc/domainalias /etc/valiases /etc/vfilters /etc/exim /etc/exim.conf /etc/exim.conf.buildtest /etc/exim.conf.dist /etc/exim.conf.local /etc/exim.conf.localopts /etc/exim.conf.mailman2.dist /etc/exim.conf....

Hi, No replies unfortunately. Unsure why. We searched the list, and we found little discussion on the subject of trusts. We see occasional questions, but they are often left unanswered, like this one. If someone could point us to some good up-to-date docs on trusts with samba then we would really appreciate it. We setup a test environment (one samba 4.9.4 testad2 AD, one native windows

Thanks everybody! The sudden burst of help (both on- and offlist) is much appreciated. :-) I'll get back to my test setup next week, and try again with these new insights. MJ On 2/28/19 3:46 PM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hai Maurik-Jan, > > Stefan's work can be found here, i'm reading it myself and its really good. > >

Hi Stefan, Thanks for your input. I'll check the dns stuff. I put resolvers for both domains as primary and secondary on both machines, but I guess that's not good enough. I'll look into setting up a (query logging) dns proxy, that should tell us at least who is asking what. Any chance to share that (german) article you wrote? My german is not perfect, but good enough to

Hai Maurik-Jan, Stefan's work can be found here, i'm reading it myself and its really good.

Hi MJ, Am 28.02.2019 15:31, schrieb mj via samba: > Hi Stefan, > > Thanks for your input. I'll check the dns stuff. I put resolvers for > both domains as primary and secondary on both machines, but I guess > that's not good enough. > NO, it's not good enough ;-) Setting up a DNS-Proxy is real easy. Just a few lines :-). > I'll look into setting up a (query

Hi Stefan, others, Just to report back that things work very nicely now that DNS is using one dns proxy that resolves both AD domains. I am testing now with a 'full' two-way trust, and everyhing seemed to work, including the tests from samba-tool and from windows "domains and trusts" perspective. From an administrative point of view, the fact that your have to add

I've read the documentation that domain trusts should be fully supported with both Kerberos and NTLM authentication. I've created a new 2016 domain on a Windows box and created a Samba domain on a Linux box with a BIND9_DLZ backend. Both servers can resolve both DNS domains forwards and backwards and I am able to connect a Windows 10 client to the Samba domain without any issues. The

copy d:\bugs.ps \\ouessant\lexmark after having deleted all the samba log files and restarted the SMBd daemon from the SWAT Web interface. This leads to the INTERNAL ERROR, see samba.oulx Now, to locate the problem, I tried the same kind of command on the same file, bugs.ps, but using the SMBCLIENT application from the Linux server itself, without changing anything, nor restarting the SMBd