search for: remoteaddr

...ude <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <netinet/in.h> #include <netinet/tcp.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <arpa/inet.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { struct sockaddr_in remoteAddr; int sock, delay = 0, n; char buf[1024]; if (argc > 1) delay = atoi(argv[1]); memset(&remoteAddr, 0, sizeof(&remoteAddr)); remoteAddr.sin_family = AF_INET; remoteAddr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK); remoteAddr.sin_port = htons(8000); sock = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STR...

...=========== --- ssh.1 2012/09/15 16:08:48 1.1 +++ ssh.1 2012/09/15 20:23:35 @@ -51,13 +51,13 @@ .Op Fl F Ar configfile .Op Fl I Ar pkcs11 .Op Fl i Ar identity_file -.Op Fl L Oo Ar bind_address : Oc Ns Ar port : Ns Ar host : Ns Ar hostport +.Op Fl L Oo Ar bind_address : Oc Ns Ar localport : Ns Ar remoteaddr : Ns Ar remoteport .Op Fl l Ar login_name .Op Fl m Ar mac_spec .Op Fl O Ar ctl_cmd .Op Fl o Ar option .Op Fl p Ar port -.Op Fl R Oo Ar bind_address : Oc Ns Ar port : Ns Ar host : Ns Ar hostport +.Op Fl R Oo Ar bind_address : Oc Ns Ar remoteport : Ns Ar localaddr : Ns Ar localport .Op Fl S Ar...

...t for new client connection gets created and is able to handle async incoming events, *2016-03-12 08:18:55.748+0000: 1247: info : virObjectNew:202 : OBJECT_NEW: obj=0x7fed54005460 classname=virLXCMonitor* *2016-03-12 08:18:55.748+0000: 1247: debug : virNetSocketNew:159 : localAddr=0x7fed7cd1d170 remoteAddr=0x7fed7cd1d200 fd=28 errfd=-1 pid=0* *2016-03-12 08:18:55.749+0000: 1247: info : virObjectNew:202 : OBJECT_NEW: obj=0x7fed54009040 classname=virNetSocket* *2016-03-12 08:18:55.749+0000: 1247: info : virNetSocketNew:209 : RPC_SOCKET_NEW: sock=0x7fed54009040 fd=28 errfd=-1 pid=0 localAddr=127.0.0.1...

...: No hook > script /usr/local/etc/libvirt/hooks/lxc > 2012-08-23 19:01:23.239+000027464: debug : daemonSetupNetworking:464 : > Registering unix socket /usr/local/var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock > 2012-08-23 19:01:23.239+000027464: debug : virNetSocketNew:119 : > localAddr=0x7fff419bf530 remoteAddr=(nil) fd=9 errfd=-1 pid=0 > 2012-08-23 19:01:23.239+000027464: debug : virNetSocketNew:179 : > RPC_SOCKET_NEW: sock=0xddcbf0 refs=1 fd=9 errfd=-1 pid=0 > localAddr=127.0.0.1;0, remoteAddr=(null) > 2012-08-23 19:01:23.239+000027464: debug : virNetSocketRef:713 : > RPC_SOCKET_REF: sock...

...nnectUNIX:640 : path=/var/run/libvirt/virtlogd-sock spawnDaemon=0 binary=<null> Line 58687: 2018-11-13 14:22:30.130+0000: 95225: debug : virNetSocketNewConnectUNIX:704 : connect() succeeded Line 58688: 2018-11-13 14:22:30.130+0000: 95225: debug : virNetSocketNew:236 : localAddr=0x7f8244ca5530 remoteAddr=0x7f8244ca55c0 fd=20 errfd=-1 pid=0 Line 58689: 2018-11-13 14:22:30.130+0000: 95225: info : virObjectNew:202 : OBJECT_NEW: obj=0x7f822c00aab0 classname=virNetSocket Line 58690: 2018-11-13 14:22:30.130+0000: 95225: info : virNetSocketNew:292 : RPC_SOCKET_NEW: sock=0x7f822c00aab0 fd=20 errfd=-1 pid=0...

I need some help understanding SIP dialog. Some actor is trying to access my server, but I can't figure out what he's trying to do ,or how. I'm getting a lot of these warnings. [May 17 10:08:08] WARNING[1532]: chan_sip.c:4068 retrans_pkt: Retransmission timeout reached on transmission _zIr9tDtBxeTVTY5F7z8kD7R.. for seqno 101 With SIP DEBUG I tracked the Call-ID to this INVITE :

...debug : virNetSocketNewConnectUNIX:641 : path=/var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock spawnDaemon=0 binary=<null> 2018-10-02 05:14:05.054+0000: 16207: debug : virNetSocketNewConnectUNIX:705 : connect() succeeded 2018-10-02 05:14:05.054+0000: 16207: debug : virNetSocketNew:237 : localAddr=0x7ffe5b15dd80 remoteAddr=0x7ffe5b15dcf0 fd=6 errfd=-1 pid=0 2018-10-02 05:14:05.054+0000: 16207: info : virObjectNew:254 : OBJECT_NEW: obj=0x5559fa83aa20 classname=virNetSocket 2018-10-02 05:14:05.054+0000: 16207: info : virNetSocketNew:293 : RPC_SOCKET_NEW: sock=0x5559fa83aa20 fd=6 errfd=-1 pid=0 localAddr=127.0.0.1;0, re...

...g : virNetSocketNewConnectUNIX:639 : path=/var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock spawnDaemon=0 binary=<null> 2017-02-17 15:58:36.127+0000: 18505: debug : virNetSocketNewConnectUNIX:703 : connect() succeeded 2017-02-17 15:58:36.127+0000: 18505: debug : virNetSocketNew:235 : localAddr=0x7fff70940d00 remoteAddr=0x7fff70940d90 fd=5 errfd=-1 pid=0 2017-02-17 15:58:36.127+0000: 18505: info : virObjectNew:202 : OBJECT_NEW: obj=0x563a2a7f7980 classname=virNetSocket 2017-02-17 15:58:36.127+0000: 18505: info : virNetSocketNew:291 : RPC_SOCKET_NEW: sock=0x563a2a7f7980 fd=5 errfd=-1 pid=0 localAddr=127.0.0.1;0,...

...tem 2013-01-10 06:06:27.276+0000: 2393: debug : doRemoteOpen:585 : Connecting with transport 1 2013-01-10 06:06:27.276+0000: 2393: debug : doRemoteOpen:661 : Proceeding with sockname /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock 2013-01-10 06:06:27.277+0000: 2393: debug : virNetSocketNew:146 : localAddr=0xbff169d4 remoteAddr=0xbff16a58 fd=7 errfd=-1 pid=0 2013-01-10 06:06:27.277+0000: 2393: debug : virObjectNew:110 : OBJECT_NEW: obj=0x48900dc8 classname=virNetSocket 2013-01-10 06:06:27.277+0000: 2393: debug : virNetSocketNew:203 : RPC_SOCKET_NEW: sock=0x48900dc8 fd=7 errfd=-1 pid=0 localAddr=127.0. 2013-01-10 06:06:27....

...nection attempt + * will continue in o2net_start_connect. + */ + atomic_set(&nn->nn_timeout, 1); + o2net_sc_queue_work(sc, &sc->sc_shutdown_work); } @@ -1447,6 +1460,7 @@ static void o2net_start_connect(struct w struct socket *sock = NULL; struct sockaddr_in myaddr = {0, }, remoteaddr = {0, }; int ret = 0, stop; + unsigned int timeout; /* if we're greater we initiate tx, otherwise we accept */ if (o2nm_this_node() <= o2net_num_from_nn(nn)) @@ -1466,8 +1480,17 @@ static void o2net_start_connect(struct w } spin_lock(&nn->nn_lock); - /* see if we already...

...: remoteConnectOpen:998 : Auto-probe remote URI debug : doRemoteOpen:599 : proceeding with name = debug : doRemoteOpen:608 : Connecting with transport 1 debug : doRemoteOpen:699 : Proceeding with sockname /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock debug : virNetSocketNew:155 : localAddr=0x3ffff825180 remoteAddr=0x3ffff825208 fd=7 errfd=-1 pid=0 debug : virObjectNew:199 : OBJECT_NEW: obj=0x2aad62a2520 classname=virNetSocket debug : virNetSocketNew:205 : RPC_SOCKET_NEW: sock=0x2aad62a2520 fd=7 errfd=-1 pid=0 localAddr=127.0.0.1;0, remoteAddr=127.0.0.1;0 debug : virObjectNew:199 : OBJECT_NEW: obj=0x2...

...; SecurityEvent="InvalidAccountID".*,Severity="Error",Service="SIP".*,Rem > oteAddress="IPV[46]/(UDP|TCP|TLS)/<HOST>/[0-9]+" > ???????? SECURITY.* .*: > SecurityEvent="FailedACL".*,Severity="Error",Service="SIP".*,RemoteAddr > ess="IPV[46]/(UDP|TCP|TLS)/<HOST>/[0-9]+" > ???????? SECURITY.* .*: > SecurityEvent="InvalidPassword".*,Severity="Error",Service="SIP".*,Remo > teAddress="IPV[46]/(UDP|TCP|TLS)/<HOST>/[0-9]+" > ???????? SECURITY.* .*:...

...RemoteOpen:599 : Connecting with transport 1 2013-07-14 20:18:52.006+0000: 18446744073709551615: debug : doRemoteOpen:688 : Proceeding with sockname /Users/brian/.cache/libvirt/libvirt-sock 2013-07-14 20:18:52.007+0000: 18446744073709551615: debug : virNetSocketNew:155 : localAddr=0x7fff6dd47340 remoteAddr=0x7fff6dd472b0 fd=6 errfd=-1 pid=0 2013-07-14 20:18:52.007+0000: 18446744073709551615: debug : virObjectNew:203 : OBJECT_NEW: obj=0x7fa630c465d0 classname=virNetSocket 2013-07-14 20:18:52.007+0000: 18446744073709551615: debug : virNetSocketNew:205 : RPC_SOCKET_NEW: sock=0x7fa630c465d0 fd=6 errfd...

...x7f7b55b86c50 opaque=0x556fbcf8b8a0 2020-07-14 16:29:58.220+0000: 5352: info : virObjectNew:250 : OBJECT_NEW: obj=0x556fbcf8d770 classname=virNetSocket 2020-07-14 16:29:58.220+0000: 5352: info : virNetSocketNew:278 : RPC_SOCKET_NEW: sock=0x556fbcf8d770 fd=18 errfd=-1 pid=0 localAddr=127.0.0.1;0, remoteAddr=127.0.0.1;0 2020-07-14 16:29:58.220+0000: 5352: info : virObjectNew:250 : OBJECT_NEW: obj=0x556fbcf8da50 classname=virNetServerClient 2020-07-14 16:29:58.220+0000: 5352: info : virObjectRef:385 : OBJECT_REF: obj=0x556fbcf8d770 2020-07-14 16:29:58.220+0000: 5352: info : virEventGLibTimeoutAdd:341...

You might find RedHat's CVE page on this useful: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2023-48795 On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 10:04?AM Kaushal Shriyan <kaushalshriyan at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have the SSH Terrapin Prefix Truncation Weakness on Red Hat Enterprise > Linux release 8.7 (Ootpa). The details are as follows. > > # rpm -qa | grep openssh >

...'/usr/local/Cellar/libvirt/1.2.19/sbin/libvirtd' 2015-10-02 08:52:11.876+0000: 18446744073709551615: debug : virFileMakePathHelper:2571 : path=/Users/bengreene/.cache/libvirt mode=0700 2015-10-02 08:52:11.876+0000: 18446744073709551615: debug : virNetSocketNew:226 : localAddr=0x7fff5f774330 remoteAddr=0x7fff5f7742a0 fd=7 errfd=-1 pid=0 2015-10-02 08:52:11.876+0000: 18446744073709551615: info : virObjectNew:202 : OBJECT_NEW: obj=0x7f9cda700730 classname=virNetSocket 2015-10-02 08:52:11.876+0000: 18446744073709551615: info : virNetSocketNew:277 : RPC_SOCKET_NEW: sock=0x7f9cda700730 fd=7 errfd=-1 p...

This fix modifies o2net layer behavior which seems to trigger some DLM race issues during umount/evictions that needs to be fixed as well. I am working on the dlm issues but meanwhile please review this patch. Thanks, --Srini

The following series of patches comprises the bulk of our outstanding changes for Ocfs2. Aside from the usual set of cleanups and fixes that were inappropriate for 2.6.25, there are a few highlights: The '/sys/o2cb' directory has been moved to '/sys/fs/o2cb'. The new location meshes better with modern sysfs layout. A symbolic link has been placed in the old location so as to