Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "rematerlialization".
Did you mean:
rematerialization
2009 Sep 14
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Spill Comments
...incurred even when AsmVerbose is off. Would it
be possible to use MachineMemOperands instead? In theory,
they should already be preserving the needed information. If
they're not sufficient, could they be improved?
There is work going on to improve the register allocator's ability
to use rematerlialization. In a world where the register allocator
can aggressively remat misc. loads, will it still be interesting to
identify spill reloads?
You mentioned at one point that you have some scripts which
know how to read some of these comments. Would it be
possible for you to include these scripts with the...
2009 Sep 11
7
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Spill Comments
Attached is a patch to print asm comments for spill information.
We've discussed the mechanisms before but I wanted to run the
patch by everyone before I start to commit pieces.
-Dave
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: spillcomments.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 58930 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
2009 Sep 14
4
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Spill Comments
...With
MachineMemOperands, would that be the getOffset() method? That's
only for FPRel data, though. What if frame pointer elimination has
been run?
I would love to get out from under the map if possible.
> There is work going on to improve the register allocator's ability
> to use rematerlialization. In a world where the register allocator
> can aggressively remat misc. loads, will it still be interesting to
> identify spill reloads?
Yes. I have a later patch that marks remats as well. The idea is to get a
sense of how well regalloc is doing. And you can't remat everything.
&g...