Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "remarkup".
Did you mean:
remarks
2016 Jan 07
3
Phabricator/Arcanist feedback
...were handling their patches manually and complaining about the web
> workflow.
>
>
>>
>> [1] http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html#status
>> [2] http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html#committing-a-change
>> [3] https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/remarkup/
>>
>> HTH,
>> Dan
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment...
2015 Dec 28
5
Phabricator/Arcanist feedback
...to improve the documentation here but I
would like some guidance on what the correct method of committing
without arcanist is.
[1] http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html#status
[2] http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html#committing-a-change
[3] https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/remarkup/
HTH,
Dan
-------------- next part --------------
PHP Warning: ini_set(): open_basedir restriction in effect. File() is not within the allowed path(s): (/srv/http/:/home/:/tmp/:/usr/share/pear/:/usr/share/webapps/) in /home/dan/dev/libphutil/scripts/__init_script__.php on line 52
Warning: ini_se...
2020 Jan 14
5
[cfe-dev] Phabricator -> GitHub PRs?
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 09:56:53PM +0000, Renato Golin via cfe-dev wrote:
> GitHub PR is the "de facto standard", everyone knows, the entry cost
> is practically zero. The UI is lean and missing features, but the
> large availability of tooling (either targeting GitHub directly or
> plain git) makes up for a lot of it.
Just like with the "Everyone knows git", I