search for: remangling

Great job! I'm considering converting all my mp3 files to Vorbis format. Only examples/encoder_example is a bit too simplistic (of course, being an example), and the cmdline tools aren't ready. I encode my mp3 files at 96 kbit/s, because that's enough for me. Will Vorbis do well at this rate? Any quick hacks I can make to examples/encoder_example.c? Perhaps Vorbis is of interest

> m:\worksp~1, when I have this share on a windows machine, it works > fine. Move it to my samba machine and it doesn't. This is what my This is probably your problem. You override the default mangling method in samba3 from hash2 to hash. hash2 behaves more like Windows mangling. > mangling method = hash Either take this line out or change it to hash2. You may need to

Hi llvm-dev@, There's been some renewed interest in integration tests for debuginfo, checking that debuggers interpret LLVMs output in the way we expect. Paul suggested a while back [0] that our (Sony's) Dexter [1] tool could be a useful driver for running debuginfo tests -- I'd like to ask whether people think this would be desirable course to take, and what the requirements for

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 6:16 AM, <Peter_Marshall at sn.scee.net> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Sorry for the delay, I've been out of the office. > > I think this example shows that name matching does not always work: > > template<typename T> class A { > public: > A(T val); > private: > T x; > }; > > struct B { > typedef

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Robinson, Paul < Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote: > That doesn't seem to be the DWARF I'm seeing from Clang (& it'd be > surprising if we used the typedef (or otherwise non-canonical) name in the > class name): > > > > Finally getting back to this….. Ha. We don't unwrap the typedefs ("name > as

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Robinson, Paul < Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote: > Actually no, we prefer to have the original typedef names in the > instantiation name, for source fidelity. > Then perhaps you should keep this change in your tree too - since that's where the need is? > "Name as it is in the source" or something reasonably close.

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Robinson, Paul < Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote: > Maybe we are being too pedantic about the names. I'll have to go back and > look in detail at why we decided to do that. > > > > In any case, arguably 5.5.8 (Class Template Instantiations) 1 only applies > to definitions of a type, not declarations. ("Each formal