search for: remainders

I'm not mathematically gifted, but shouldn't 957%60 be 15 remainder 57? Google and my desktop calculator certainly think so. So where am I going wrong here? The following code exten => 7,1,Verbose(Context: ${CONTEXT} Exten:${EXTEN}) same => n,Set(myNum=957) same => n,Set(sec=$[REMAINDER(${myNum},60)]) same => n,Set(sec=$[ABS(${sec})]) same =>

OK, the code for sdivrem in APInt.h is wrong. Here's what's written: static void sdivrem(const APInt &LHS, const APInt &RHS, APInt &Quotient, APInt &Remainder) { if (LHS.isNegative()) { if (RHS.isNegative()) APInt::udivrem(-LHS, -RHS, Quotient, Remainder); else APInt::udivrem(-LHS, RHS, Quotient, Remainder); Quotient =

I wrote the following bit of code static APInt FloorOfQuotient(APInt a, APInt b) { unsigned bits = a.getBitWidth(); APInt q(bits, 1), r(bits, 1); APInt::sdivrem(a, b, q, r); * errs() << "sdivrem(" << a << ", " << b << ") = (" << q << ", " << r << ")\n"; * if (r == 0) return q; else {

Hi Hameeza, Aside from Ashutosh's patch..... When the vector width is that large, we can't keep vectorizing remainder like below. It'll be a huge code size if nothing else ---- hitting ITLB miss because of this is very bad, for example. VF=2048 // main vector loop VF=1024 // vectorized remainder 1 VF=512 // vectorized remainder 2 ... Vectorize remainder until trip count is

>it cannot afford large size masks for large vectors So, even a standard way of vectorizing remainder in masked or unmasked fashion wouldn’t work, I suppose. Ouch. I suppose VPlan should be able to model this kind of gigantic remainder vector code (when the time comes). Not pretty at all, though. Now, be fully aware that Direction #2 is really a poor (or rather extremely poor) person’s

Some time ago I tried to find out how to compute remainders in R. I now know that it is done with %%, which is documented in help('+'), but before someone told me that I tried: help('remainder'), help.search('remainder'), apropos('remainder') help('modulo'), help.search('modulo'), and apropos('modulo...

After analyzing verbose nouveau & drm dmesg, I have found seemingly no more useful details pertaining to having no TV-1 device. The TV-1 device might be getting lost within DRM, by setting the TV-1 (SVIDEO, Composite) device into DPMS mode or Full Power Down mode, and the ch7006 datasheet does say in this mode, all but the i2c circuits are disabled! Looking at

Hi, Is there any way to sort a tabel with a colum with IP-address? table: id rank color status ip 138 29746 yellow no 162.131.58.26 138 29746 red yes 162.131.58.16 138 29746 blue yes 162.131.58.10 138 29746 red no 162.131.58.17 138 29746 yellow no 162.131.58.14 138 29746 red no 162.131.58.13 138 29746 yellow no 162.132.58.15 139 29746 green no 162.252.20.69 140 29746 red yes

Hello, I m working on a hardware with very large vector width till v2048. Now when I vectorize using llvm default vectorizer maximum 2047 iterations are scalar remainder loop. These are not vectorized by llvm which increases the cost. However these should be vectorized using next available vector width I.e v1024, v512, v256, v128, v64, v32, v16, v8, v4..... The issue of scalar remainder loop has

> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 02:53:02PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >I believe that ch7006 is the only external encoder that's supposed to >work, so you're in luck. It sounds like it passes the nv04_tv_identify >stage of nv04_tv_create -- perhaps it fails later? Although based on >the prints, it's even doing dpms stuff (but it hits _detect a second >time... odd). Try

hi netters Is there a function in R that can compute the quotient and remainder of a division calculation? such that when 11 is given as the dividend and 5 the divider, the function returns 2(quotient) and 1(remainder). Thanks a lot! _________________________________________________________________ 伱佲伔佈佅伮佋佖 MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/

Mark II of the patch set. The first patch (dynsumlen2.patch) increments the protocol version to support per-file dynamic block checksum sizes. It is a prerequisite for varsumlen2.patch. varsumlen2.patch implements per-file dynamic block and checksum sizes. The current block size calculation only applies to files between 7MB and 160MB setting the block size to 1/10,0000 of the file length for a

On 6 March 2015 at 03:47, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley at hansenpartnership.com> wrote: > From: James Bottomley <JBottomley at Parallels.com> > > The current string_get_size() overflows when the device size goes over > 2^64 bytes because the string helper routine computes the suffix from > the size in bytes. However, the entirety of Linux thinks in terms of >

On 6 March 2015 at 03:47, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley at hansenpartnership.com> wrote: > From: James Bottomley <JBottomley at Parallels.com> > > The current string_get_size() overflows when the device size goes over > 2^64 bytes because the string helper routine computes the suffix from > the size in bytes. However, the entirety of Linux thinks in terms of >

On Aug 5, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Peter Lawrence wrote: > However it seems that if a landingpad-block has multiple predecessors (often the case, > multiple InvokeInst in the main body of a try-statement all go to the same landingpad- > block), then you cannot move the LandingpadInst in order to break a critical edge unless > you do it for _all_ landingpad-block predecessor edges

From: Jyri Sarha <jsarha at ti.com> Also adds inline asm implementations of WORD2INT(x) macro for fixed and floating point. --- libspeex/resample_neon.h | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/libspeex/resample_neon.h b/libspeex/resample_neon.h index ba93e41..e7e981e 100644 --- a/libspeex/resample_neon.h +++

Dear r-helpers, I'm looking for a way of sorting variable names in a "natural" order, when the names are composed of digits and other characters. I know that this is a vague idea, and that sorting character strings is a complex topic, but perhaps a couple of examples will clarify what I mean: > s <- c("x1b", "x1a", "x02b", "x02a",

When a whole-file checksum is performed, hashing was done in 64 byte blocks, causing overhead and limiting performance. Testing showed the performance improvement to go up quickly going from 64 to 512 bytes, with diminishing returns above, 4096 was where it seemed to plateau for me. Re-used CHUNK_SIZE (32 kB) as it already exists and should be fine to use here anyway. Noticed this because

On 02/22/2017 11:52 AM, Adam Nemet via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi Ashutosh, > >> On Feb 22, 2017, at 1:57 AM, Nema, Ashutosh via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> This is a proposal about epilog loop vectorization. >> Currently Loop Vectorizer inserts an epilogue loop for handling loops

Thanks for looking into this. 1) Issues with re running vectorizer: Vectorizer might generate redundant alias checks while vectorizing epilog loop. Redundant alias checks are expensive, we like to reuse the results of already computed alias checks. With metadata we can limit the width of epilog loop, but not sure about reusing alias check result. Any thoughts on rerunning vectorizer with reusing