search for: relicence

Hi Is there any way to insert L7 rules by using the ndpi-netfilter module? /GH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We''ll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers

Hi, I'm using IPSEC in a multi-ISP configuration, lsm 0.131, Kernel 2.6.32, ipsec-tools 0.8.0 This worked fine with Shorewall/Shorewall-Lite 4.5.7. After updating Shorewall to 4.5.8 the routing of ESP packets doesn't work. If I change the Providers.pm file and add connmark => "! --mark 0/$mask" like before in Shorewall 4.5.7 than everything works fine. add_ijump

Cloud Computing and Rails are a natural good fit. With tools provided by New Relic integrated into the RightScale Deployment and Monitoring platform you have a Best Practice Monitoring system. I Deploy and Watch servers all day as part of the http://myCloudWatcher.com service. When I started to build the demo for this next RightScale Webinar I learned more about my application in the first few

Hi all, I have tried to figure out how to do this one but I think I have just confused myself more. My firewall is a 2 interface setup, the same box is my router to my uplink. I''m not using nat at all and have a public IP range behind this machine. net = eth0 loc = eth1 Most of my rules are mainly the basic HTTP(ACCEPT) net loc:111.111.111.112 SMTP(ACCEPT) net

This problem probably has a simple solution, so I''m hoping the experienced shorewall users can help me. I''ve got a 3-interface (net,dmz, & loc) firewall and have several apache2 virtual web sites in the dmz. They come into 1 apache server in the dmz, and are redirected with the directive "ProxyPass" and "ProxyPassReverse" in my Apache

I''m trying to enable tftp traffic initiated from our dmz network to our internal network. I have: TFTP(ACCEPT) dmz loc:10.10.10.1 in /etc/shorewall/rules, and: oadmodule nf_conntrack_tftp in /etc/shorewall/modules. The module is loaded and I do see some entries come and go, e.g.: udp 17 10 src=4.28.99.164 dst=10.10.10.1 sport=2071 dport=69 [UNREPLIED]

I''m a big fan of New Relic. One of the services they provide is alerts when your traffic goes up unexpectedly above a predetermined level. Does anyone have a favorite, inexpensive "traffic alert" tool that can be used on a small site--a site that''s not yet big enough for monthly payments of $150 for New Relic Silver (or even the $36 price tag for New Relic Silver on

I had installed puppet master and client on two different machines. machine A has puppet master and machine B has client. both are centos6 64 bit machines. Machine B (client) is successfully connected to master (machine A). My aim is to install New Relic agent (server monitorinig tool) on different clients. I had installed new relic agent on machine A and trying to build a module so that I

...PI to create a tun > device and to pass it to the tinc daemon. I don't even know if there is > something similar for iOS and/or Windows Phone. I am optimism about this, I think all the three platform have enough VPN API support. If release as libtinc possible, will that possible that you relicence TINC as LGPL to make commercial use possible?

Hi, Not much left to fix in my migration script (moving between two dovecot servers). However, I discovered a mail folder .INBOX without cur, new and tmp subfolders, and the .imap.index files were rather old (feb 2006). Is this an old relic from early dovecot versions (I once ran 0.99 on this old server)? Or is it old client software? There are no data in it. TIA, Peter -- Peter Lindgren

In working through an IPv6/TPROXY issue I had, I believe I found a documentation bug: http://www.shorewall.net/manpages6/shorewall6-tcrules.html In the ACTION section, for part 12. SAME: The documentation lists: #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST # PORT(S) SAME:P 192.168.1.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 tcp

Hi, I''ve been confused about the purpose of _marker in dragdrop.js for quite a while. It doesn''t really look like it does anything with ghosting on or off. I removed the mark method and didn''t discover any problems. Is all the mark business a relic from some past idea? Thanks, Peter

On 19 April 2018 at 05:04, Always Learning <centos at u68.u22.net> wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 09:40 +0100, John Hodrien wrote: > >> > On Wed, April 18, 2018 8:36 pm, Always Learning wrote: > >> >> I have an aversion to using anything that comes from unknown sources, as >> >> used by Torrent. > >> Can we also challenge this

Hello I'm reading http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html and some things aren't clear. There are a couple of references made to %llvm.dbg.variable, which isn't defined anywhere. It it an intrinsic? A global? Could it be a relic from the old debug info docs (where it *is* defined?). The same goes for llvm.dbg.derivedtype and llvm.dbg.subrange which are also referenced but not

Hi all- In migrating from 3.0.2 to 3.0.8 on a box that's an ADS domain member, I had a relic line in smb.conf like this: winbind separator char = - With 3.0.2, users connecting wouldn't have a domain and separator char component, so spnego kerberos replies to the 2003 domain controller would be fine. In 3.0.8, users connections would have the domain and separator char for spnego

Several instruction classes override getType() when the instruction always creates a particular type of value. For example, the result of insertelement is always a vector, so InsertElementInst overrides getType() to return a VectorType*. This makes perfect sense. However, ExtractValueInst and InsertValueInst override getType() to return a PointerType*, which does not make sense and is

On Thu, November 24, 2016 12:28, H wrote: > You are right, I had forgotten about needing two WiFi adapters... If > there is an Ethernet jack in the hotel room I would go with that but > that is, of course, far from assured and two WiFi nets would be > needed. I have found Ethernet RJ45 ports in hotel rooms with wi-fi frequently no longer active and simply relics of an earlier

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 2:07 PM Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 11:10:23 +0530 > Thomas Stephen Lee <lee.iitb at gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > /usr/bin/sensors > > > > from the lm_sensors package > > > > I had run > > > > sensors-detect --auto > > I had no idea people still used that package.

Just wait tinc be more lib style for some future days:) 2016-10-09 22:45 GMT+08:00 Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org>: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 10:40:12PM +0800, Cong Monkey wrote: > >> If release as libtinc possible, will that possible that you relicence >> TINC as LGPL to make commercial use possible? > > Both tinc and MeshLink are licensed under the GPL and will stay that > way. However, if you want to use MeshLink in a commercial project, you > can buy a commercial license. > > -- > Met vriendelijke groet / with kind r...

Hello, In short: there's a Windows Server 2003 system, which worked without many problems with NT domain (Samba 3). The NT domain is being shut down, and I noticed I have hard time trying to befriend the mentioned system with AD run under Samba 4.7.6 (default on Ubuntu 18.04). Is the mentioned AD incompatible with Windows Server 2003? When trying to join, I get cryptic message about