search for: relentlessly

Hello! In my relentless quest for knowledge, I pose this question: who's got the biggest dialplans, and how big are these monsters? What's the biggest dialplan in use right now? If you feel you are a competitor, let me know how many contexts/extensions/priorities you are dealing with. Maybe the context with the most extensions, the extension with the most priorities would be

funny guy!!! A BIG thank you to Bjorn and Rowland for his relentless patience and support. Regards, Phil This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents

Hello, I am using AuthLogic as my authentication gem. Everything is great on my development server. When I upload to my passenger driven production server at Dreamhost, the sessions are persisting relentlessly. In other words, a user cannot log out. I have tried implementing the Active Record session store and have changed the :secret key in initializers/session_store.rb, but for some reason, it is not resetting my users. Another interesting note is that in the Appplication Controller if I force curre...

...it's hard, and I'd argue, likely impossible. For example I even added a "frozen" package [1] in the sources / unit tests to test for just this. In practice you just cannot hit every possible access point of the (rich, in our case) API so the tests pass too often. Which is why we relentlessly test against reverse-depends to _at least ensure buildability_ from our releases. As for seamless binary upgrade, I don't think in can work in practice. Ask Uwe one day we he rebuilds everything every time on Windows. And for what it is worth, we essentially do the same in Debian. Sometimes...

On 19/02/2020 18:55, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > Just another test. Could I get a few replies please? > > Regards, Phil > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified > that disclosing, copying, distributing or

...impossible. | > | > For example I even added a "frozen" package [1] in the sources / unit tests | > to test for just this. In practice you just cannot hit every possible access | > point of the (rich, in our case) API so the tests pass too often. | > | > Which is why we relentlessly test against reverse-depends to _at least ensure | > buildability_ from our releases. I meant to also add: "... against a large corpus of other packages." The intent is to empirically answer this. | > As for seamless binary upgrade, I don't think in can work in practice. Ask...

...y Bataev, who wrote most of the code! Apart of Alexey, many other people contributed to this effort; most notably Alexander Musman (also from Intel), who implemented #pragma simd; Mahesha S (then from AMD, now from Samsung), who wrote initial patch that started it all; Intel Compiler QA team, that relentlessly worked behind the scenes to test new developments all the way; and last, but not least Richard Smith (Google), John McCall (Apple), Hal Finkel (ANL), Dmitry Gribenko (Apple) and Doug Gregor (Apple) who did a ton of code reviews and ensured high quality of the implementation. Other people worth men...

...or example I even added a "frozen" package [1] in the sources / unit tests | > | > to test for just this. In practice you just cannot hit every possible access | > | > point of the (rich, in our case) API so the tests pass too often. | > | > | > | > Which is why we relentlessly test against reverse-depends to _at least ensure | > | > buildability_ from our releases. | > | > I meant to also add: "... against a large corpus of other packages." | > The intent is to empirically answer this. | > | > | > As for seamless binary upgrade, I don...

[TOP lINE: is there a linux program that will tell me where all the installed files went?] Hi all....great to be here... i''m pretty relentless yet very new to RoR and fairly new to Linux [went with ubuntu 7.10 for the time being - learing pure Deb and/or Slack/BDS for the future] anyhooo.. So... Coming from my highly understood XP install [frankly it feels yuk these days] i''m

Hi, I am facing problem in sync time within DomU with Dom0. After gone through mailing lists, I have set /proc/sys/xen/independent_wallclock to 0. But still DomU are not syncing their time :-S Machine using kernel-xen-2.6.19-1.2911.fc6 xen-3.0.3-3.fc6 xen-libs-3.0.3-3.fc6 Please advice to solve this weird problem, Thanks _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Hi Everyone, Just a quick test. Been trying to get back on the list for years and finally looks like there's a proverbial light at the end of the samba list tunnel! Phil

Just another test. Could I get a few replies please? Regards, Phil This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly

On 19/02/2020 19:00, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 19/02/2020 18:55, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: >> Just another test. Could I get a few replies please? >> >> Regards, Phil >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and >> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they >> are addressed. If you are not the

...rgue, likely impossible. > > For example I even added a "frozen" package [1] in the sources / unit tests > to test for just this. In practice you just cannot hit every possible access > point of the (rich, in our case) API so the tests pass too often. > > Which is why we relentlessly test against reverse-depends to _at least ensure > buildability_ from our releases. > > As for seamless binary upgrade, I don't think in can work in practice. Ask > Uwe one day we he rebuilds everything every time on Windows. And for what it > is worth, we essentially do the sam...

> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Doug Lytle <support@drdos.info> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion < > asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:25:11 -0400 > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] How big is *your* dialplan?? > Steve Murphy wrote: > > Hello! > > > > In my relentless

I was feeling a bit un-appreciated as a Developer and I thought of all the other developers of Open Source (Free) Software who relentlessly contribute to/make Open Source (free) software. I just wanted to take some time to officially say *Thank You* for all the good things which you guys/gals have made to my(/our) benefit, of which has either saved my skin or improved my work efficiency. To All of you, I say a Big Thank You for it....

My name is Mark Dinan and I am a Silicon Valley based recruiter. Are you in the job market? I have three openings with a startup in San Francisco that is looking to hire 2-3 Ruby on Rails engineers. They just got a strong funding round ($XX Million) and are looking to staff up in a hurry with some talented engineers who are passionate about gaming, social networking, and consumer facing

On 19/02/2020 19:05, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 19/02/2020 19:00, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 19/02/2020 18:55, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: >>> Just another test. Could I get a few replies please? >>> >>> Regards, Phil >>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and >>> intended solely for the use of the

...| > For example I even added a "frozen" package [1] in the sources / unit tests > | > to test for just this. In practice you just cannot hit every possible access > | > point of the (rich, in our case) API so the tests pass too often. > | > > | > Which is why we relentlessly test against reverse-depends to _at least ensure > | > buildability_ from our releases. > > I meant to also add: "... against a large corpus of other packages." > The intent is to empirically answer this. > > | > As for seamless binary upgrade, I don't think i...

On Jan 17, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Alessandro Baggi <alessandro.baggi at gmail.com> wrote: > > On sdb there are not problem but with sda: > > 1) First run badblocks reports 28 badblocks on disk > 2) Second run badblocks reports 32 badblocks > 3) Third reports 102 badblocks > 4) Last run reports 92 badblocks. It?s dying. Replace it now. On a modern hard disk, you should