Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "relented".
Did you mean:
releated
2012 Dec 11
4
Syslinux 5 Path Option.
I'm not seeing how to set this path option?
Here is what I get using vesamenu.c32 as an example when
moved to a directory outside of the build. The current syslinux
4.06 has all the files in the same directory which is at the root of
the cd.
ldd vesamenu.c32
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb77c5000)
../../com32/libutil/libutil_com.c32 => not found
../../com32/lib/libcom32.c32 => not found
2017 Sep 21
4
/var/run/... being deleted :((
Hi,
what keeps deleting files and directories under /var/run? Having them deleted
is extremely annoying because after a reboot, things are suddenly broken because
services don?t start.
2013 Mar 09
0
Updated MSVC patch
...ent a huge portion of
> developers.
I find it difficult to believe that developers sophisticated enough to
actually use the FLAC API, are not smart enough to read the comments
above the <stdint.h> include and grab one of the linked implementations.
Anyway, regardless of all that, I have relented and included an
MSVC < 2010 section in that file with the logic switched around a bit
and some comments.
I would like to know how many years I have to wait before we can ditch
this stuff.
I intend to do some testing on platforms I have available today and
roll a second pre-release after my tes...
2017 Oct 11
0
/var/run/... being deleted :((
On 09/21/2017 08:14 AM, hw wrote:
> what keeps deleting files and directories under /var/run?? Having them
> deleted
> is extremely annoying because after a reboot, things are suddenly
> broken because
> services don?t start.
You've received a lot of advice, criticism, and information from this
original post, and I'm not going to rehash any of those things.? If
2013 Mar 08
2
Updated MSVC patch
> Are the changes for FLAC/ordinals.h really necessary? Yhe FLAC/*.h
> header files specify libFLAC's public API. In a previous thread on
> this mailing list back in February we decided that for compilers
> that didn't supply <stdint.h> the developer should supply something
> suitable. Here's the commit:
Yes, they are necessary. Here is the rationale
1)
2005 Jun 20
1
New Forum
a combination list+forum
(all forum posts are posted to list,
all list posts are posted to forum)
seems to work well for some other projects I work on,
but I also don't mind having them separate if that's easier.
--mark
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:48:49 +0200, Iceuse - Kris wrote:
> Kelvin Chu wrote:
>
> >Being very old school, I think mailing lists rock :-)
> >
>
2017 Oct 13
3
/var/run/... being deleted :((
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017, Lamar Owen wrote:
> If the maintainers of packages that want to run well on CentOS 7 need to have
> /var/run/$some-file persistence (or pseudo-persistence, which is the current
> behavior enabled by re-creating said files) then those maintainers will need
> to change their packages to match actual behavior or file a bug report with
> upstream to change the
2012 Nov 02
8
Very slow directory listing and high CPU usage on replicated volume
Hi all,
I am having problems with painfully slow directory listings on a freshly
created replicated volume. The configuration is as follows: 2 nodes with
3 replicated drives each. The total volume capacity is 5.6T. We would
like to expand the storage capacity much more, but first we need to figure
this problem out.
Soon after loading up about 100 MB of small files (about 300kb each), the