search for: relent

...0003 (PLTGOT) 0x6458 0x00000002 (PLTRELSZ) 552 (bytes) 0x00000014 (PLTREL) REL 0x00000017 (JMPREL) 0x10a8 0x00000011 (REL) 0xce0 0x00000012 (RELSZ) 968 (bytes) 0x00000013 (RELENT) 8 (bytes) 0x00000016 (TEXTREL) 0x0 0x6ffffffa (RELCOUNT) 70 0x00000000 (NULL) 0x0 So where does one modify this new PATH setting? The ../../com32 path is in plan text using hexedit to look at, and could be manuall...

Hi, what keeps deleting files and directories under /var/run? Having them deleted is extremely annoying because after a reboot, things are suddenly broken because services don?t start.

...ent a huge portion of > developers. I find it difficult to believe that developers sophisticated enough to actually use the FLAC API, are not smart enough to read the comments above the <stdint.h> include and grab one of the linked implementations. Anyway, regardless of all that, I have relented and included an MSVC < 2010 section in that file with the logic switched around a bit and some comments. I would like to know how many years I have to wait before we can ditch this stuff. I intend to do some testing on platforms I have available today and roll a second pre-release after my t...

...packages to match actual behavior or file a bug report with upstream to change the behavior.? Upstream will probably close with a 'WONTFIX' and the package maintainer will either change packaging or stop supporting CentOS 7.? Of course, stranger things have happened, and upstream might relent on the decision.? But my gut feel is that upstream will keep the current behavior and the packages will eventually be changed to support it, but I always reserve the right to be wrong.

> Are the changes for FLAC/ordinals.h really necessary? Yhe FLAC/*.h > header files specify libFLAC's public API. In a previous thread on > this mailing list back in February we decided that for compilers > that didn't supply <stdint.h> the developer should supply something > suitable. Here's the commit: Yes, they are necessary. Here is the rationale 1)

a combination list+forum (all forum posts are posted to list, all list posts are posted to forum) seems to work well for some other projects I work on, but I also don't mind having them separate if that's easier. --mark On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:48:49 +0200, Iceuse - Kris wrote: > Kelvin Chu wrote: > > >Being very old school, I think mailing lists rock :-) > > >

...ctual behavior or file a bug report with > upstream to change the behavior.? Upstream will probably close with a > 'WONTFIX' and the package maintainer will either change packaging or stop > supporting CentOS 7.? Of course, stranger things have happened, and upstream > might relent on the decision.? But my gut feel is that upstream will keep the > current behavior and the packages will eventually be changed to support it, > but I always reserve the right to be wrong. I see at least two possible intermediate results: The RHEL 7 folks do something, perhaps make a packa...

Hi all, I am having problems with painfully slow directory listings on a freshly created replicated volume. The configuration is as follows: 2 nodes with 3 replicated drives each. The total volume capacity is 5.6T. We would like to expand the storage capacity much more, but first we need to figure this problem out. Soon after loading up about 100 MB of small files (about 300kb each), the