search for: relegated

A search of the archives did not reveal an answer: For basic tests of association, where one has no a priori knowledge of the form of the relation or of the distributions of the variables, rank correlation seems like a good start. Why is cor.test() with Kendall and Spearman options relegated to the ctest package, rather than in the base package? Does this suggest that the developers consider other tests of association more generally useful? Thanks, Hank Martin Henry H. Stevens, Assistant Professor 338 Pearson Hall Botany Department Miami University Oxford, OH 45056 Tel: (513) 529-4...

On Aug 26, 2009, at 4:09 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: [...] > > The second part of this is that there are a lot of reasons for things > to be defined inline in C++ even if we don't want it to actually be > inlined. I don't think those are _good_ reasons though: If one doesn't want a C+ + function to be inlined, one shouldn't define it inline. > For example,

I created a client library to send emails for a webapp. After connecting to the SMTP server with credential setup in CPANEL, and then do NOT add Message-Id header, the DKIM signature 'h' record created by dovecot/WHM is wrong, and a Message-ID (with a capital D) header is added, invalidating the generated DKIM signature value. This causes outlook, yahoo, gmail and other email

...t is not so much raw cpu speed but memory and lots of it. My builds got to linking llc and at that point linker started eating megabytes of memory like chocolate. So sadly chumbys, beagleboards, iThingis(?), Raspberry Pis, Gumstix and even inexpensive Tegra2 boards seem to be out of contention and relegated to target testing. Based on my observations minimum memory required to build LLVM-3.0 seems to be 768MB to 1GB of RAM plus a 1.2+ GB of free disk space for one kind of build. NVIDIA has some tegra2 boards with 1GB but for their prices one can get 3 tegra2 based trim-slice-pros. Pawel >>...

On Aug 26, 2009, at 2:31 PM, David Vandevoorde wrote: > > >> I know/hope that the proposal isn't for the inlinehint to be a >> synonym >> for "force inline", it would just raise the threshold to increase the >> likeliness that it would be inlined. The question is whether >> "something being c++ inline" in any way is really

...EW_AUTHTOK_REQD, as required by PAM even though the user can't be said to be authenticated at that point. The problem with this is that by the time pam_acct_mgmt() is called in OpenSSH userauth has been completed, so kbd-interactive is not used for the password changing and instead the work is relegated till the TTY session is setup. By then the login process has begun and the user even has a UTMP entry. To make matters worse, OpenSSH calls pam_setcred() before pam_chauthtok(). Clearly that is wrong. Our PAM_KRB5 module has a module option "pw_exp_in_auth" which causes it to do the pas...

On Aug 26, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Devang Patel wrote: >>> I do not understand how the "inlinehint" will help. How will it >>> influence the inliner ? >> >> The hint should make it more attractive to inline. I don't know >> the details >> yet and they will require some experimenting. >> > > In that case you want to add hint to A

?I want to take advantage of my multicore CPU to speed up a loop in a simulation program.? I didn?t write the code, but the iterations appear independent to me, at least in the sense that the results of one loop do not depend on previous ones.? Right now I?m relegated to a Windows box that runs Windows 7.? These appear to be the options: ? Pnmath-appears to parallelize non-BLAS routine but requires a special build Fork-UNIX only Romp-looks like this hasn?t advanced past the developmental stage Multicore-use on Windows at your own risk R/parallel-seems like the b...

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Evan Cheng<evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2009, at 2:31 PM, David Vandevoorde wrote: > >> >> >>> I know/hope that the proposal isn't for the inlinehint to be a >>> synonym >>> for "force inline", it would just raise the threshold to increase the >>> likeliness that it would

...d but memory and lots of it. > My builds got to linking llc and at that point linker started > eating megabytes of memory like chocolate. > > So sadly chumbys, beagleboards, iThingis(?), Raspberry Pis, Gumstix > and even inexpensive Tegra2 boards seem to be out of contention > and relegated to target testing. > > Based on my observations minimum memory required to build LLVM-3.0 > seems to be 768MB to 1GB of RAM plus a 1.2+ GB of free disk space > for one kind of build. > > NVIDIA has some tegra2 boards with 1GB but for their prices one can > get 3 tegra2 based tr...

Greetings, I spent the better part of a day tracking down a rather annoying problem. I would like someone more knowledgeable than myself to confirm this diagnosis. I have a RH 8.0 Linux box with three NICS. I had been developing it testing with an XP box. Everything seemed groovy. Today I went to put it into "production" and Win98 clients were having all sorts of problems.

On 9 Jan 2013, at 04:49, Marc J. Driftmeyer wrote: > It's not a coincidence that GCC 4.2.1 is the baseline on FreeBSD considering the licensing of GPL restrictions on new releases. [With my FreeBSD hat on] Our plan for 10.0 is to ship clang only, with gcc 4.2.1 relegated to a compat package for tier 1 architectures. This should be x86, x86-64, and ARMv6/7 (and maybe v8 if we're very lucky, but probably not). MIPS and PowerPC are slowly migrating to clang, but will probably take a little bit longer (although given the progress that these are making, possibly n...

...if you make changes to it in Word, and then save it, when you go back to the directory there will be -rw-rw-r-- 1 francis galexia 2980 Feb 5 12:35 blah.doc -rw-rw-r-- 1 francis galexia 2567 Feb 5 12:33 blah.doc.bak > /somewhere/blah.doc ie samba has created a new *regular* file, and relegated the old (and unaltered) link to a .bak file, leaving the source file of the link unchanged. Is there a way to make samba follow the link when you save things as well? thanks in advance, francis -- ----------------------------------- Francis Vierboom francis@galexia.com Research Officer Gal...

It's not a coincidence that GCC 4.2.1 is the baseline on FreeBSD considering the licensing of GPL restrictions on new releases. - Marc On 01/08/2013 04:46 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote: > On 1/8/2013 5:45 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> some version of Clang and later (Freebsd folks?). > > FreeBSD 9.1 uses GCC 4.2.1 and Clang 3.0, although I have some doubts > about

Hi all! I'm working on a project that, funnily enough, involves clustering and "winbindd". Specifically, we have a 2-node cluster configured in an active-active configuration whereby both servers are running Samba, each "exporting" different filesystems that are backed on a shared storage subsystem such that at any given time, one node can takeover from the other. The

David Vandevoorde a écrit : > > I don't think those are _good_ reasons though: If one doesn't want a C+ > + function to be inlined, one shouldn't define it inline. > > You must not have written a lot of C++ template then. You don't have the choice in this case, just check your STL header. > > FWIW, I've been involved in a couple of attempts by

On Monday 26 November 2007 16:21, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > Try 'Llvm_analysis.assert_valid_module m;' before you write bitcode to > figure out where things went awry. ('dump_module m;' may also help.) > GIGO applies (but garbage-in/segfault-out is more likely). Ok, thanks for the tip. > Unfortunately, even if the bindings were more strongly typed, it would > still

...r flights of modeling fancy, they do; but in the end, it is neither an objective process nor one whose "uncertainty" can be strictly quantified. In creating the illusion that "statistical methods" can overcome these limitations, I think we have both done science a disservice and relegated ourselves to an isolated, fringe role in scientific inquiry. Needless to say, opposing viewpoints to such iconclastic remarks are cheerfully welcomed. Best regards, Bert Gunter

A little bird whispers to me: Don't expect this particular trick to be un-addressed by various legislatures forever. That window is closing, and the bottom of the window looks very much like a guillotine blade - don't have your head in the wrong place. In any case, as has been discussed on -users before (which is where this thread should go, and thus where I'm relegating it)

...the smb.conf it defines, I find that the username map option. I added the username map option to the smb.conf of FS3, and created the mapping file with: !root = "INTERNAL\Administrator" "INTERNAL\administrator" Upon trying this, I have success. (yay!) SO: The script is now relegated to an "old_set_of_scripts" repository, so I'm not sure if this is still the Right Thing to do. Are there ramifications to this mapping that need to be considered? Is this a debian-specific issue, like the libnss_winbind.so linking? Are there any reasons that I should NOT add these...