search for: releaselto

...benefits, I would vote for enabling as is. > > I’ve been working on some additional changes to bring compile-time down a > bit further, while keeping the number of eliminated stores at a similar > level. Geomeans: > -O3 +0.62% > ReleaseThinLTO +1.06%, > ReleaseLTO-g +0.79% Re > ReleaseThinLTO (link-only) +0.96% > ReleaseLTO-G (link only). +0.80% > > > http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=e19ef1aab524ef10a2d118adcd9f6fd6ca2d7ca9&to=c6812412983b4ebb20f1e32b83893284c8117e7f&stat=instructions > > This also i...

Hi Florian, First, thank you for working on this. I'm really glad to see this work so close to being enabled. I think the numbers look good for run time, and the benefits of switching for all configurations are clear. For compile time, the current regressions are noticeable, but not a deal breaker in my opinion. I'm very much in favor of switching in all configurations. To address some

...e numbers are from a branch with additional compile-time tuning. Geomean changes (see link for full details) Executed Instrs. Size (text) O3 +0.86% -0.29% ReleaseThinLTO +1.59% -0.38% ReleaseLTO-g: +1.18% -0.35% ReleaseThinLTO (link-only) +1.68% -0.38% ReleaseLTO-g (link only): +1.36% -0.35% http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=4cc20aa74339812c3e4daa4138ed40cb98521bfc&to=504153dc6efd29ad37ffb6ffb2e80d4101b56e5b&s...