Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "release_501".
Did you mean:
release_50
2017 Dec 30
3
No tags in the Git mirrors
...use git tags there (at least until the git
> migration would happen). Please use the release branches.
To me it doesn't matter if it's a tag or a branch, but, as far as I can
see, there are no branches for point releases. For example, there's a
branch release_50, but no branch for release_501, which exists in the
Subversion repository.
[1] https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/branches/all
--
/Jacob Carlborg
2019 Apr 12
2
Failed to replace stdlibc++ with libc++, linker phase error
...-lc++ -lm -lgcc_s -lgcc -lc -lgcc_s -lgcc ), which we didn't have
them setup anywhere in our project, just out of curiosity, are they added
automatically? Why are they needed?
A little bit more details:
Environment: CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core)
Clang version:
clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_501/final)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
Thanks for any ideas,
Aichi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190412/a5b57f09/attachment.html>
2019 Apr 13
2
Failed to replace stdlibc++ with libc++, linker phase error
...u are using clang++ or g++ as the linker driver, then it automatically
> adds the flags for you.
>
> -Tom
>
>>
>> A little bit more details:
>> Environment: CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core)
>> Clang version:
>>
>> clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_501/final)
>> Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>> Thread model: posix
>>
>>
>> Thanks for any ideas,
>> Aichi
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org...
2017 Dec 30
2
No tags in the Git mirrors
I've noticed that there are no tags in any of the Git mirrors [1], [2]
or [3]. Would it be possible to add the tags?
[1] https://git.llvm.org/git/llvm.git
[2] https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm
[3] https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507
--
/Jacob Carlborg
2018 Feb 27
0
Question about instcombine pass.
...e.
I have a question about llvm's "Combine redundant instructions(instcombine)" pass.
I have tested instcombine pass by writing the following three test cases.
But, CASE3 is not optimized as I expected.
Is this behavior expected?
The version of llvm is:
clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_501/final 325232)
Option of clang command is:
clang -O1 a.c -S -emit-llvm -o -
TEST Programs:
(CASE1)
This case is optimized as I expected.
----------------------------------
#define LEN 10
int a[LEN], b[LEN], c[LEN], X[LEN];
void foo() {
int i;
for (i=1; i<LEN; i++) {
a[i] += b[i]...
2018 Aug 03
3
[7.0.0 Release] The release branch is open; trunk is now 8.0.0
On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 at 11:42, Martin J. O'Riordan via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> A few months ago I switched from using SVN for the LLVM project to using the GIT mono-repo, but I am still not particularly good at using GIT. How can I use the GIT command-line interface to select to the exact same set of sources used for the v7.0.0 branch,
Do you mean the commit