Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "release_351".
Did you mean:
release_31
2015 Mar 04
2
[LLVMdev] Clang 3.5.1 assertion failure on FreeBSD when building LLDB
A change between r231216 and r231221 causes an assertion failure on
the LLDB FreeBSD bot. The compiler is FreeBSD's in-tree one: FreeBSD
clang version 3.5.1 (tags/RELEASE_351/final 225668) 20150115
First failing build:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-freebsd/builds/4668/steps/compile/logs/stdio
Assertion:
Assertion failed: ((!DD->isTrivial() || DD->hasAttr<DLLExportAttr>())
&& "Should not emit dtor epilogue for non-exported trivi...
2015 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] Inconsistencies or intended behaviour of LLVM IR?
...ter type (and many others),
but not a named structure pointer type. E.g.
%x = type [1 x i32]* ; valid.
%x = type {i32}* ; invalid.
Is this the intended behaviour? Attaching a.ll, b.ll, c.ll and d.ll for
reference. All files except d.ll compiles without error using clang
version 3.5.1 (tags/RELEASE_351/final).
> $ clang d.ll
> d.ll:3:16: error: expected top-level entity
> %x = type {i32}*
> ^
> 1 error generated.
Does it have anything to do with type equality? (just a hunch)
* Item 2 - equality of named types
A named integer type is equivalent to its literal...
2015 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] Inconsistencies or intended behaviour of LLVM IR?
...%x = type [1 x i32]* ; valid.
>>> %x = type {i32}* ; invalid.
>>>
>>> Is this the intended behaviour? Attaching a.ll, b.ll, c.ll and d.ll for
>>> reference. All files except d.ll compiles without error using clang
>>> version
>>> 3.5.1 (tags/RELEASE_351/final).
>>>
>>> $ clang d.ll
>>>> d.ll:3:16: error: expected top-level entity
>>>> %x = type {i32}*
>>>> ^
>>>> 1 error generated.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Does it have anything to do with type equa...
2015 Jan 28
4
[LLVMdev] Inconsistencies or intended behaviour of LLVM IR?
...ter type. E.g.
>>
>> %x = type [1 x i32]* ; valid.
>> %x = type {i32}* ; invalid.
>>
>> Is this the intended behaviour? Attaching a.ll, b.ll, c.ll and d.ll for
>> reference. All files except d.ll compiles without error using clang version
>> 3.5.1 (tags/RELEASE_351/final).
>>
>>> $ clang d.ll
>>> d.ll:3:16: error: expected top-level entity
>>> %x = type {i32}*
>>> ^
>>> 1 error generated.
>>
>> Does it have anything to do with type equality? (just a hunch)
>>
>> * Item...
2015 Apr 23
2
[LLVMdev] Get precise line/column debug info from LLVM IR
I am trying to locate instructions in an LLVM Pass by line and column
number (reported by an third-party tool) to instrument them. To achieve
this, I am compiling my source files with `clang -g -O0 -emit-llvm` and
looking for the information in the metadata using this code:
const DebugLoc &location = instruction->getDebugLoc();
// location.getLine()
// location.getCol()
2015 Feb 02
2
[LLVMdev] Inconsistencies or intended behaviour of LLVM IR?
...gt;>>>>> Is this the intended behaviour? Attaching a.ll, b.ll, c.ll and d.ll
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> reference. All files except d.ll compiles without error using clang
>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>> 3.5.1 (tags/RELEASE_351/final).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $ clang d.ll
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> d.ll:3:16: error: expected top-level entity
>>>>>>>> %x = type {i32}*
>>>>>>>> ^
>>>...