search for: release_15

...ed in major problems with these platforms. If you can help, please email the list with what platform you'll be testing. To get a copy of what I'm testing, you need to check out a copy of the release branch as follows (adding whatever options are needed to set CVSROOT properly): cvs co -r release_15 llvm cvs co -r release_15 llvm-gcc cd llvm/projects cvs co -r release_15 llvm-test If you have commit access, please don't commit anything to the release branch without asking the list first. Thanks in advance. -- John T. -- John T. Criswell Research Programmer University of Illinois at Ur...

...ase email the list with what platform you'll be >> testing. >> >> To get a copy of what I'm testing, you need to check out a copy of the >> release branch as follows (adding whatever options are needed to set >> CVSROOT properly): >> >> cvs co -r release_15 llvm >> cvs co -r release_15 llvm-gcc >> cd llvm/projects >> cvs co -r release_15 llvm-test >> >> If you have commit access, please don't commit anything to the release >> branch without asking the list first. >> >> Thanks in advance. >>...

...> > If you can help, please email the list with what platform you'll be > testing. > > To get a copy of what I'm testing, you need to check out a copy of the > release branch as follows (adding whatever options are needed to set > CVSROOT properly): > > cvs co -r release_15 llvm > cvs co -r release_15 llvm-gcc > cd llvm/projects > cvs co -r release_15 llvm-test > > If you have commit access, please don't commit anything to the release > branch without asking the list first. > > Thanks in advance. > > -- John T. >

...;>>> testing. >>>> >>>> To get a copy of what I'm testing, you need to check out a copy of the >>>> release branch as follows (adding whatever options are needed to set >>>> CVSROOT properly): >>>> >>>> cvs co -r release_15 llvm >>>> cvs co -r release_15 llvm-gcc >>>> cd llvm/projects >>>> cvs co -r release_15 llvm-test >>>> >>>> If you have commit access, please don't commit anything to the release >>>> branch without asking the list first....

It's OK.

...at platform you'll be >>> testing. >>> >>> To get a copy of what I'm testing, you need to check out a copy of the >>> release branch as follows (adding whatever options are needed to set >>> CVSROOT properly): >>> >>> cvs co -r release_15 llvm >>> cvs co -r release_15 llvm-gcc >>> cd llvm/projects >>> cvs co -r release_15 llvm-test >>> >>> If you have commit access, please don't commit anything to the release >>> branch without asking the list first. >>> >>>...

...ou can help, please email the list with what platform you'll be testing. >> >>To get a copy of what I'm testing, you need to check out a copy of the >>release branch as follows (adding whatever options are needed to set >>CVSROOT properly): >> >>cvs co -r release_15 llvm >>cvs co -r release_15 llvm-gcc >>cd llvm/projects >>cvs co -r release_15 llvm-test >> >>If you have commit access, please don't commit anything to the release >>branch without asking the list first. >> >>Thanks in advance. > > > I...

Chris: It was in the 1.5 release but not subsequent to that. You can find this by looking for the file in the branches that were converted from subversion. You can find the file you're looking for here: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_15/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LowerConstantExprs.cpp?view=log Reid. On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 14:29 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Ben Chambers wrote: > > How hard would it be to compile this pass and add it to the passes > > that opt can run? Is this something I should be...

Dear All, I created the LLVM 1.5 release branch this afternoon. It is called release_15. I would prefer that people hold off on committing non-release changes to the mainline until after the release is complete (as people sometimes request that I fold more mainline changes into the branch). However, if you need to commit something, you can do so. Within the next day or two, I...

On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Ben Chambers wrote: > How hard would it be to compile this pass and add it to the passes > that opt can run? Is this something I should be able to do relatively > quickly? What was the name of the file(s) that implemented the pass? It should be easy, modulo it bitrotting. It is already built as an opt pass. The filename was LowerConstantExpr.cpp IIRC. -Chris

How hard would it be to compile this pass and add it to the passes that opt can run? Is this something I should be able to do relatively quickly? What was the name of the file(s) that implemented the pass? Thanks, Ben On 7/3/07, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > >> We used to have a 'lowerconstantexpr' pass in