search for: releasable

llvm[4]: Compiling PoolAllocate.cpp for Release+Asserts build /home/NIKHILREDDY/WORK/LLVM_SRC/projects/poolalloc/lib/PoolAllocate/PoolAllocate.cpp: In member function ‘virtual bool llvm::PoolAllocate::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)’: /home/NIKHILREDDY/WORK/LLVM_SRC/projects/poolalloc/lib/PoolAllocate/PoolAllocate.cpp:403:16: error: ‘class llvm::Constant’ has no member named

Hi, I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The current process is documented here: https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html There are two parts to this proposal. The first is a list of clarifications, which are things we are currently doing that aren't documented. The second is a list of changes which would actually modify how releases are currently managed.

Hi All I need some real help in using virt-install. I have a fedora8 o/s + Xen installed and wanted to have RHEL4 as the Guest Domain. I have mounted the CD1 of RHEL4 and wanted to install this as guest domain using virt-install and not able to do and seeking help. Please let me know if the parameters to virt-install are correct and if not please let me know the correct parameters. Contents of

Any help is greatly appreciated.   Thanks Chandra Sekhar --- On Sun, 11/16/08, Chandra Sekhar <sekhar_15@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Chandra Sekhar <sekhar_15@yahoo.com> Subject: [Xen-users] Error while running virt-install To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Date: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 11:23 PM Hi All I need some real help in using virt-install. I have a fedora8 o/s + Xen

Hello all, Help me please do mirror of freebsd.org. I got *.sgml through CVSup, installed textproc/docproj. But when I typed make: [root@xxx /www/freebsd/]make ===> en ===> en/security ===> en/commercial ===> en/docproj ===> en/news ===> en/news/1993 ===> en/news/1996 ===> en/news/1997 ===> en/news/1998 ===> en/news/1999 ===> en/news/2000 ===> en/news/2001

I'm trying to write a script for checking whether the compiler recursed properly. rkotler at mipsswbrd002:~/slave/recurse3be/build$ find . -name "*.o" -exec cmp '{}' ../../recurse2be/build/'{}' \; |& tee foo.txt Is anyone else doing this? There 2 compilers, recurse 2 and recurse3 that in principle should be identical. Obviously if there is date and time

Hi, I would like to start a discussion about improvements to the stable release process, but first, here is a proposed schedule for the 4.0.1 release. May 1, 2017 -rc1 May 22, 2017 Deadline for submitting merge request May 29, 2017 Deadline for merging changes. June 3, 2017 -rc2 June 10, 2017 Final Release This is slightly different from previous stable releases in that we are doing an early

Effective today, Shorewall is adopting a new release model which is patterned after the one used in the Linux Kernel. 1. Releases continue to have a three-level identification x.y.z (e.g., 2.0.3). 2. The first two levels (x.y) designate the Major Release Number (e.g., 2.0) 3. The third level (z) designates the Minor Release Number. 4. Even numbered major releases (e.g., 1.4,

Hi all, After updating llvm+clang to r174701 by issuing make -j8 happiness The build fails with: ... make[2]: Entering directory `/local/csaba/LLVM/build-release/tools/llvm-diff' llvm[2]: Compiling DiffConsumer.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[2]: Linking Release+Asserts executable lli (without symbols) llvm[2]: Compiling CrashDebugger.cpp for Release+Asserts build

The current Shorewall release model has the following characteristics: a) The last two major releases are supported. b) Only the latest major release is actively developed. c) Bug fixes are available for the prior major release but only against the last minor release. d) The last major release is advertised as the "Current Release". I''m thinking of switching to a model that

Hi, I would like to try again to do stable releases for LLVM 3.4. Even though we were unsuccessful with stable releases for LLVM 3.3, I learned some things going through the process, which I think will increase the chance for success with LLVM 3.4. So, here is my TODO list for a successful 3.4.1 release: 1. Get volunteers to help This is probably the most important thing on this list. Stable

Hi, Here are some top reminders for the 3.12 release: 1) When 3.12 is released 3.8 will be EOL'd, hence users are encouraged to prepare for the same as per the calendar posted here. 2) 3.12 is a long term maintenance (LTM) release, and potentially the last in the 3.x line of Gluster! 3) From this release onward, the feature freeze date is moved ~45 days in advance, before the release.

I'm getting an error when trying to build llvm 2.2's tblgen: llvm[2]: Linking Release executable tblgen (without symbols) /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols: llvm::MemoryBuffer::getFileOrSTDIN(char const*, unsigned int, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >*, long long) llvm::cl::ParseCommandLineOptions(int, char**, char const*) It's

I get this error periodically in backgroundrb.log, but only on my production box (the one running ruby 1.8.5) - my dev box doesn''t get this error. As far as I can tell, everything is working ok, despite the error (I don''t really know how to determine if the jobs are getting threaded successfully, but they are running, that I am sure of). Here''s the dump: no

Thanks! Can you post the sha1's for the files you uploaded? Windows and Mac look good. Uploaded: ca26fbfabb54ac1f70776ab3a5503313ec518f18 clang+llvm-3.9.0-rc2-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz 26d616e1355dc0802f90babbd5ea0b72abc0c0bb LLVM-3.9.0-rc2-win32.exe 42363aeaff395d442f418d77b542a088b5b0658b LLVM-3.9.0-rc2-win64.exe Thanks, Hans On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Diana Picus <diana.picus

I’m happy to run them, although I’d appreciate a pointer to the appropriate documentation. From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Tobias Hieta via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Reply-To: Tobias Hieta <tobias at plexapp.com> Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 11:15 AM To: Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at

Current llvm release 2.8 branch at r115409 is broken on x86_64-apple-darwin10. #!/bin/bash -ev export LD=`xcode-select -print-path`/usr/bin/ld xcode-select -print-path ulimit -s `ulimit -s` ulimit -s mv ../clang-2.8 ./tools/clang mkdir ../llvm_objdir cd ../llvm_objdir ../llvm-2.8/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/share/info --with-gmp=/sw

... and why they are (probably) not errors. > bindtextdomain > daemon/guestfsd.c > erlang/erl-guestfs-proto.c > examples/copy_over.c > examples/create_disk.c > examples/display_icon.c > examples/inspect_vm.c > examples/mount_local.c > examples/virt-dhcp-address.c > tests/c-api/test-add-drive-opts.c > tests/c-api/test-add-libvirt-dom.c >

On 1/16/20 5:03 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:08 PM Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > >> On 17/01/20 8:06 am, Lamar Owen wrote: >>> On 1/16/20 6:49 AM, Peter wrote: >>>> On 16/01/20 4:14 am, Brian Stinson wrote: >>>>> Release for CentOS Linux 8 (1911) >>>>> >>>>> We are pleased

Dear testers, 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183. This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue. Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how everything goes. >From this point, the branch