search for: relatorlist

...ribute to the person and > organisation elements. DC has provision for qualifiers, there is a proposed 'agent-role' <http://dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2002/05/Agent-roles.html> which, last time I looked, used the MARC relator list: <http://www.loc.gov/marc/sourcecode/relator/relatorlist.html> Two things to notice: 1. That is a massively long list. 2. It doesn't appear to do what we want. But it is there. However, no such scheme can reasonably provide support for one-of-roles such as 'Othello', this suggests that beyond simple role-refinement there are a number...

...ts. > > > > DC has provision for qualifiers, there is a proposed 'agent-role' > > <http://dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2002/05/Agent-roles.html> > > which, last time I looked, used the MARC relator list: > > <http://www.loc.gov/marc/sourcecode/relator/relatorlist.html> > > > > > > > > But it is there. However, no such scheme can reasonably provide > > support for one-of-roles such as 'Othello', this suggests that beyond > > simple role-refinement there are a number of mini-metadata specs > > required her...

...> organisation elements. > > DC has provision for qualifiers, there is a proposed 'agent-role' > <http://dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2002/05/Agent-roles.html> > which, last time I looked, used the MARC relator list: > <http://www.loc.gov/marc/sourcecode/relator/relatorlist.html> > > > But it is there. However, no such scheme can reasonably provide > support for one-of-roles such as 'Othello', this suggests that beyond > simple role-refinement there are a number of mini-metadata specs > required here. > Okay, I'm not sure if this...

Daniel Aleksandersen wrote: > By the way, I have bee discussing Dublin Core (?DC?) with the developers of > the Atom 1.0 specification. It seams the reason they created atom:rights > instead of using dc:rights were just about what I thought it was: They > though DC was too loosely defined. Their own atom:rights element were > designed to more clearly define what the element