Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "relative_id".
Did you mean:
relative_ids
2012 Oct 02
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH / PROPOSAL] bitcode encoding that is ~15% smaller for large bitcode files...
...), and uses signed VRBs for phis,
- Jan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121001/72a138aa/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: relative_ids.patch4
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 36425 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121001/72a138aa/attachment.obj>
2012 Oct 08
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH / PROPOSAL] bitcode encoding that is ~15% smaller for large bitcode files...
...- Jan
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121008/0599d7ba/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: relative_ids.patch5
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 38577 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121008/0599d7ba/attachment.obj>
2012 Oct 06
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH / PROPOSAL] bitcode encoding that is ~15% smaller for large bitcode files...
> Thanks for taking a look! I wasn't sure of better way to toggle this
> behavior at the module level vs the function level. The options I toyed
> with were:
>
> (a) bump MODULE_CODE_VERSION from 0 to 1
> (b) add a new optional module code to identify the change
> (c) stick with the approach in the first patch, which used a new function
> block ID value, then
2012 Sep 30
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH / PROPOSAL] bitcode encoding that is ~15% smaller for large bitcode files...
On Sep 25, 2012, at 5:08 PM, Jan Voung <jvoung at chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been looking into how to make llvm bitcode files smaller. There is one simple change that appears to shrink linked bitcode files by about 15%. See this spreadsheet for some rough data:
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjRrJHQc4_bddEtJdjdIek5fMDdIdFFIZldZXzdWa0E
2012 Sep 26
9
[LLVMdev] [PATCH / PROPOSAL] bitcode encoding that is ~15% smaller for large bitcode files...
...quot; vs no flags, with llvm-as.
- Jan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120925/81159bd3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: relative_ids.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 38652 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120925/81159bd3/attachment.obj>