Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "rel2".
Did you mean:
rel
2010 Oct 18
1
make error for R 2.13.0 (and 2.12.0)
...released version of 2.12.0. Here is the output
on an Ubuntu Linux system:
begin installing recommended package cluster
* installing *source* package 'cluster' ...
** libs
make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/RtmpWX7ecF/R.INSTALL2aaf76ad/cluster/src'
gcc -std=gnu99 -I/u/radford/R/R-2.12.0-rel2/include -I/usr/local/include -fpic -g -O2 -c clara.c -o clara.o
g77 -fpic -g -O2 -c daisy.f -o daisy.o
g77 -fpic -g -O2 -c dysta.f -o dysta.o
gcc -std=gnu99 -I/u/radford/R/R-2.12.0-rel2/include -I/usr/local/include -fpic -g -O2 -c fanny.c -o fanny.o
gcc -std=gnu99 -I/u/radford/R/R-2...
2003 Dec 17
5
beginner programming question
...ver I think I'm ready.
I have a (rather theoretical) programming problem for which I have found
a solution, but I feel it is a rather poor one. I wonder if there's some
other (more clever) solution, using (maybe?) vectorization or
subscripting.
A toy example would be:
rel1 rel2 rel3 age0 age1 age2 age3
sex0 sex1 sex2 sex3
1 3 NA 25 23 2 NA
1 2 1 NA
4 1 3 35 67 34 10
2 2 1 2
1...
2006 May 01
2
OCFS for Solaris
Any word on when OCFS for Solaris will be coming out?
Larry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20060501/c26cbfee/attachment-0001.html
2006 May 01
2
OCFS for Solaris
Any word on when OCFS for Solaris will be coming out?
Larry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20060501/c26cbfee/attachment-0001.html
2012 Jan 12
1
relative frequency plot using ggplot or other function
Hi
I have a data frame in the following form. There are two groups and for
each 'width' relative frequency for group1 and group2 is given. How to plot
this in R using ggplot or other package.
Width relativeFrequency1 relativeFrequency2
1 100 0.0006388783 0.02265428
2 200 0.0022677303 0.02948625
3 300 0.0061182673 0.01739936
4 400 0.0152237225 0.02569902
5 500
2012 Jul 18
3
Oracle UEK kernel on CentOS
Hello CentOS Guys,
What do you think about the Oracle Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel?
Since Release 2 of the UEK Kernel, all updates are available free of
charge > http://public-yum.oracle.com/
My questions:
Does the Oracle UEK kernel really perform better than the default centos kernel?
Technical advantages and disadvantages?
Would you use the Oracle UEK Kernel on centos?
--
Chris
1999 Jan 04
1
lists
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text
Size: 1102 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/19990104/be3e8b08/attachment.pl
1998 Aug 22
0
Handling of offsets in glm is really inconsistent.
...1970 1970.25 1970.5 1970.75
0.02686281 0.03816228 0.03910487 0.04325638 0.03599068
1971 1971.25 1971.5 1971.75
0.03357946 0.03890549 0.04196893 0.03952385
and prediction on either scale with newdata ignores the offset. Now, S is
also inconsistent (prior to S-PLUS 4.5 rel2), but at least it does usually
include the offset (except for prediction on link scale with no newdata,
where the offset was omitted until recently). [The different print layout
is due to the original response being a time series of class "ts"; the
predict method cannot know that.]
The d...
2015 Sep 22
2
The Trouble with Triples
...s with?
I'm using this particular example because I have the machine to hand. There are
more examples above. On Debian Jessie (mips):
$ touch empty.c
$ gcc -c -o empty.gcc.o empty.c
$ clang-3.5 -c -o empty.clang.o empty.c
$ file empty.*.o
empty.clang.o: ELF 32-bit MSB relocatable, MIPS, MIPS32 rel2 version 1 (SYSV), not stripped
empty.gcc.o: ELF 32-bit MSB relocatable, MIPS, MIPS-II version 1 (SYSV), not stripped
Jessie only has clang-3.5 but you'd get the same result with clang-3.7 and clang-3.8.
> Could you please provide some examples of things that are impossible right now
>...
2015 Sep 17
6
The Trouble with Triples
I think we need to take a step further back and re-enter from the right starting point. The thing that's bothering me about the push back so far is that it's trying to discuss and understand the consequences of resolving the core problem while seemingly ignoring the core problem itself. The reason I've been steering everything back to GNU Triple's being ambiguous and inconsistent