search for: rel1.9

First, thanks for testing this! > Here's the results for GNU/Linux, 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5smp (Fedora Core 5) > > HIGH LEVEL COMMENTS > * The llvm-1.9.tar.gz file unpacks to a dir named "llvm". Shouldn't > that be llvm-1.9? We have always labeled the dir just llvm which is fine. If you build llvm it will know its version 1.9. > * LLVM was built in Release mode

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >> * I don't think this is ready for release. In particular the llvm-gcc4 >> binary >> seg faults on FC 5 for most of llvm-test programs. >> * I'm going to re-try without using the binaries and building >> everything from scratch. > > Does llvm-gcc4 seg fault for make check? I've done extensive

Tanya, Here's the results for GNU/Linux, 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5smp (Fedora Core 5) HIGH LEVEL COMMENTS * The llvm-1.9.tar.gz file unpacks to a dir named "llvm". Shouldn't that be llvm-1.9? * LLVM was built in Release mode in all cases * I don't think this is ready for release. In particular the llvm-gcc4 binary seg faults on FC 5 for most of llvm-test programs. *

LLVMers, The LLVM 1.9 Prerelease is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.9/ If anyone can spare some time, please download the appropriate tarballs for your platform and test the release (at least with make check). I'd also appreciate any documentation reviews. Please note that llvm-gcc3 on x86 may not have a clean dejagnu run. You should see one XPASS for

Hi Tanya, Here's my second attempt on Fedora Core 5. The changes this time are: 1. Using GCC 4.0.3 as the compiler 2. Building everything from source (no pre-built binaries used) BUILD LLVM WITH GCC 4.0.3 * No issues, just the usual warnings. BUILD LLVM-GCC WITH GCC 4.0.3 * No issues RUN LLVM-TEST WITH GCC 4.0.3 * The following failures were encountered. Some of them are