search for: reiterating

On 08/02/15 05:09, S.Tindall wrote: > On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 23:06 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> On my X86-64 CentOS 6.6 machine I just ran yum update. In the update >> was an upgrade from the 340.XX Nvidia package to the 346.XX package. >> Hrmmm? I'm thinking this is not a good idea but, since this is just a >> test system any way, I let

Dear expeRts, I am currently struggling with the problem of finding cut points for a set of stimulus variables. I would like to obtain cut points iteratively for each variable by re-applying a dichotomised variable in the model and then recalculate it. I planned to have fixed names for the dichotomised variables so I could use the same syntax for every recalculation of the whole model. I

Hi, I'm Marianna I'm trying to apply the command "repeat" to my matrix but the repeat process doesn't work as I would. In particular I would like to apply the function robustm () _that I have created_ to my two matrices, if the difference between the two matrices is less than 0.001, R give me back the last matrix. The code thus created allows me to repeat the process only

...o", ylab="stato", ylim=c(...), lwd=3, col="red", lty=1) par(new=T) plot(0:n, b, type= "l", main="", xlab="", ylab="", ylim=c(), lwd=3, col="green", lty=2) #technically i've tryed to fuse all those parts in a function reiterating k=100 times with a for cycle, but with no succes, and i dare there must be something really disturbing in the code below .... function(k){ for (i in 1:k){ a[i]<-rwalk(1e+04,0.5,0) o[i]<-which(a[i]==0) N[i]<-length(o[i]) Nn[i]<-(o[i][-1]-N[i]) V[i]<-mean(Nn[i]) w<-c(V[1]:V[k])...

Hi Timo, when logging out like a001 logout the imap child dies from signal 11. The back trace looks like this: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xb7ed4991 in strcasecmp () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0xb7ed4991 in strcasecmp () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #1 0x0806ab6c in command_unregister (name=0x815b9ab "LOGOUT") at commands.c:83 #2

Hi, I just installed Version 2.0.0-prealpha on a Solaris 2.5.1 machine. We are exporting one filesystem to the PC's. I can connect from my Win95 PC without a problem and I see all the files on the shared drive. If I bring up Windows explore and double click on a text file I can see the file without a problem. I then close the file and go to the unix box and change the text file. If I then

Hi all, I'm currently building a DSL for a computer graphics project that is not unlike NVIDIA's Cg. I have an intrinsic with the following signature float4 sample(texture tex, float2 coords); that is translated to this LLVM IR code: declare void @"sample"(%float4* noalias nocapture sret, %texture, $float2) nounwind readnone The type float4 is basically an array of four

When I set up my initial users for the Samba domain i did not realize that RIDs were supposed to be dynamic. I was creating the user as a posixAccount in LDAP, and then adding the Samba elements via a script that I wrote. Their RIDs are the same as their UID. For instance if I have a user with uidNumber 1036, her SID would be <domain-SID>-1036. This is fine except for idmapping for

Hi all, LLVM 4.0.0 is out, and I can say that LLD/ELF is now ready for production use at least for x86-64 (and probably for AArch64 and MIPS). I believe you've heard a few good news about the linker -- it just works <http://lld.llvm.org/#features> and is very fast <http://lld.llvm.org/#performance>, clean, compact and supported by the active community. I don't think I need to

"Rotem, Nadav" <nadav.rotem at intel.com> writes: > David, > > Thanks for the support! I sent a detailed email with the overall > plan. But just to reiterate, the GEP would look like this: > > %PV = getelementptr <4 x i32*> %base, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 4> > > Where the index of the GEP is a vector of indices. I am not

David, Thanks for the support! I sent a detailed email with the overall plan. But just to reiterate, the GEP would look like this: %PV = getelementptr <4 x i32*> %base, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 4> Where the index of the GEP is a vector of indices. I am not against having multiple indices. I just want to start with a basic set of features. Thanks, Nadav

Hi llvm-dev, I'm writing on behalf of a team at AMD working on upstreaming support for AMD GPUs into GDB. We have drafted a proposal of backwards compatible extensions to DWARF for heterogeneous debugging which is rendered at https://llvm.org/docs/AMDGPUDwarfProposalForHeterogeneousDebugging.html. The proposal includes a thorough introduction with justification, so I won't belabor that

On 03/03/2015 11:03 PM, Earl Killian wrote: > On 2015/3/2 10:03, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> that is all nice >> >> but the main benefit of RBL's is always ignored: >> >> * centralized >> * no log parsing at all >> * honeypot data are "delivered" to any host >> * it's cheap >> * it's easy to maintain >> * it

Hello dear R Users, I am working on a dataset of 928 Enterprises, of which are observed 12 different characters. I need to randomly sample, without repetition, 70% of the entreprises, to create a testing set, and let the other 30% of the enterprises be a validating set (holdout validation, I think that is). How do I do that? Of course all the characters of each row must remain together. Also, I

Am 02.03.2015 um 18:56 schrieb Robert Schetterer: > perhaps and i mean really "perhaps" go this way > > https://sys4.de/de/blog/2014/03/27/fighting-smtp-auth-brute-force-attacks/ > > https://sys4.de/de/blog/2012/12/28/botnets-mit-rsyslog-und-iptables-recent-modul-abwehren/ > > 45K+ IPs will work in a recent table > i have them too but for smtp only like > >

----- Original Message ----- > "Rotem, Nadav" <nadav.rotem at intel.com> writes: > > > David, > > > > Thanks for the support! I sent a detailed email with the overall > > plan. But just to reiterate, the GEP would look like this: > > > > %PV = getelementptr <4 x i32*> %base, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 2, i32 > > 3, i32

(please be gentle, it's my first time) I am interested in discussions (possibly reiterating past threads -- searching didn't turn up much) on the possibility of supporting standard evaluation unquoting at the language level. This has been brought up in a recent similar thread here [1] and on Twitter [2] where I proposed the following desired (in-principle) syntax f <- function...

Forgive me if this question has been asked/answered in another post. And let me reiterate what other users have frequently said - Asterisk is great, and I really appreciate all the work you folks have put into it. How have some of you gone about integrating Asterisk with a legacy office PBX, such that the end-user can use a regular office (digital handset) and dialing is fairly seamless ? Our

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 4:16 AM Michel D?nzer <michel at daenzer.net> wrote: > > On 2020-05-11 10:12 p.m., Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Christian K?nig > > <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> AGP is deprecated for 10+ years now and not used any more on modern hardware. > >> > >> Old

greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > Jose Fonseca <jfonseca at vmware.com> writes: > >> The important thing IMO, is to not represent the gather operation as >> an instruction which takes a vector of pointers, because that's too >> restrictive for architectures with 64bits pointers. > > How is it restrictive? Ah, I think you mean you