search for: reiterates

On 08/02/15 05:09, S.Tindall wrote: > On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 23:06 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> On my X86-64 CentOS 6.6 machine I just ran yum update. In the update >> was an upgrade from the 340.XX Nvidia package to the 346.XX package. >> Hrmmm? I'm thinking this is not a good idea but, since this is just a >> test system any way, I let

Dear expeRts, I am currently struggling with the problem of finding cut points for a set of stimulus variables. I would like to obtain cut points iteratively for each variable by re-applying a dichotomised variable in the model and then recalculate it. I planned to have fixed names for the dichotomised variables so I could use the same syntax for every recalculation of the whole model. I

Hi, I'm Marianna I'm trying to apply the command "repeat" to my matrix but the repeat process doesn't work as I would. In particular I would like to apply the function robustm () _that I have created_ to my two matrices, if the difference between the two matrices is less than 0.001, R give me back the last matrix. The code thus created allows me to repeat the process only

hello R-masters. i have an R-issue here that i don't know if you'd wish to help me? about it: briefly i'd like to generate many (say hundred) realizations of a random walk, execute a few operations on each of them (mean time of return), and graph each realization on the same plot. IN OTHER WORDS I'D LIKE TO IMPOSE A LOOPING CYCLE TO THE COMMAND NOT THE ARGUMENT OF THE COMMAND.

Hi Timo, when logging out like a001 logout the imap child dies from signal 11. The back trace looks like this: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xb7ed4991 in strcasecmp () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0xb7ed4991 in strcasecmp () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #1 0x0806ab6c in command_unregister (name=0x815b9ab "LOGOUT") at commands.c:83 #2

Hi, I just installed Version 2.0.0-prealpha on a Solaris 2.5.1 machine. We are exporting one filesystem to the PC's. I can connect from my Win95 PC without a problem and I see all the files on the shared drive. If I bring up Windows explore and double click on a text file I can see the file without a problem. I then close the file and go to the unix box and change the text file. If I then

Hi all, I'm currently building a DSL for a computer graphics project that is not unlike NVIDIA's Cg. I have an intrinsic with the following signature float4 sample(texture tex, float2 coords); that is translated to this LLVM IR code: declare void @"sample"(%float4* noalias nocapture sret, %texture, $float2) nounwind readnone The type float4 is basically an array of four

When I set up my initial users for the Samba domain i did not realize that RIDs were supposed to be dynamic. I was creating the user as a posixAccount in LDAP, and then adding the Samba elements via a script that I wrote. Their RIDs are the same as their UID. For instance if I have a user with uidNumber 1036, her SID would be <domain-SID>-1036. This is fine except for idmapping for

Hi all, LLVM 4.0.0 is out, and I can say that LLD/ELF is now ready for production use at least for x86-64 (and probably for AArch64 and MIPS). I believe you've heard a few good news about the linker -- it just works <http://lld.llvm.org/#features> and is very fast <http://lld.llvm.org/#performance>, clean, compact and supported by the active community. I don't think I need to

"Rotem, Nadav" <nadav.rotem at intel.com> writes: > David, > > Thanks for the support! I sent a detailed email with the overall > plan. But just to reiterate, the GEP would look like this: > > %PV = getelementptr <4 x i32*> %base, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 4> > > Where the index of the GEP is a vector of indices. I am not

David, Thanks for the support! I sent a detailed email with the overall plan. But just to reiterate, the GEP would look like this: %PV = getelementptr <4 x i32*> %base, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 4> Where the index of the GEP is a vector of indices. I am not against having multiple indices. I just want to start with a basic set of features. Thanks, Nadav

Hi llvm-dev, I'm writing on behalf of a team at AMD working on upstreaming support for AMD GPUs into GDB. We have drafted a proposal of backwards compatible extensions to DWARF for heterogeneous debugging which is rendered at https://llvm.org/docs/AMDGPUDwarfProposalForHeterogeneousDebugging.html. The proposal includes a thorough introduction with justification, so I won't belabor that

On 03/03/2015 11:03 PM, Earl Killian wrote: > On 2015/3/2 10:03, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> that is all nice >> >> but the main benefit of RBL's is always ignored: >> >> * centralized >> * no log parsing at all >> * honeypot data are "delivered" to any host >> * it's cheap >> * it's easy to maintain >> * it

Hello dear R Users, I am working on a dataset of 928 Enterprises, of which are observed 12 different characters. I need to randomly sample, without repetition, 70% of the entreprises, to create a testing set, and let the other 30% of the enterprises be a validating set (holdout validation, I think that is). How do I do that? Of course all the characters of each row must remain together. Also, I

Am 02.03.2015 um 18:56 schrieb Robert Schetterer: > perhaps and i mean really "perhaps" go this way > > https://sys4.de/de/blog/2014/03/27/fighting-smtp-auth-brute-force-attacks/ > > https://sys4.de/de/blog/2012/12/28/botnets-mit-rsyslog-und-iptables-recent-modul-abwehren/ > > 45K+ IPs will work in a recent table > i have them too but for smtp only like > >

----- Original Message ----- > "Rotem, Nadav" <nadav.rotem at intel.com> writes: > > > David, > > > > Thanks for the support! I sent a detailed email with the overall > > plan. But just to reiterate, the GEP would look like this: > > > > %PV = getelementptr <4 x i32*> %base, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 2, i32 > > 3, i32

(please be gentle, it's my first time) I am interested in discussions (possibly reiterating past threads -- searching didn't turn up much) on the possibility of supporting standard evaluation unquoting at the language level. This has been brought up in a recent similar thread here [1] and on Twitter [2] where I proposed the following desired (in-principle) syntax f <-

Forgive me if this question has been asked/answered in another post. And let me reiterate what other users have frequently said - Asterisk is great, and I really appreciate all the work you folks have put into it. How have some of you gone about integrating Asterisk with a legacy office PBX, such that the end-user can use a regular office (digital handset) and dialing is fairly seamless ? Our

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 4:16 AM Michel D?nzer <michel at daenzer.net> wrote: > > On 2020-05-11 10:12 p.m., Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Christian K?nig > > <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> AGP is deprecated for 10+ years now and not used any more on modern hardware. > >> > >> Old

greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > Jose Fonseca <jfonseca at vmware.com> writes: > >> The important thing IMO, is to not represent the gather operation as >> an instruction which takes a vector of pointers, because that's too >> restrictive for architectures with 64bits pointers. > > How is it restrictive? Ah, I think you mean you