search for: reissued

...SA-99:03 Security Advisory FreeBSD, Inc. Topic: Three ftp daemons in ports vulnerable to attack. Category: ports Module: wu-ftpd and proftpd Announced: 1999-09-05 Reissued: 1999-09-15 Affects: FreeBSD 3.2 (and earlier) FreeBSD-current and -stable before the correction date. Corrected: FreeBSD-3.3 RELEASE FreeBSD as of 1999/08/30 for wuftpd only (Note: there is only one ports tree which is shared with all FreeBSD branches, so if you are running a...

...GE----- ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-00:61 Security Advisory FreeBSD, Inc. Topic: tcpdump contains remote vulnerabilities [REISSUED] Category: core Module: tcpdump Announced: 2000-10-31 Reissued: 2000-11-06 Credits: Discovered during internal auditing. Affects: All releases of FreeBSD 3.x, 4.x prior to 4.2 FreeBSD 3.5.1-STABLE and 4.1.1-STABLE prior to the correction da...

...ament predictors in more powerful processors may be able to compensate for it. That said, the alternative sequence you propose seems like it would be an improvement on any processor with a multiple issue pipeline (unless ret does a lot more work than I think it does), though it doesn't fix the reissued pop problem on Atom. --Owen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110104/f15faf28/attachment.html>

This problem is likely to be specific to Windows, and particularly Win7. After a successful build of a package (R CMD build addendum), I immediately run an R CMD check for the same package. Not always, but _very_ often, I get the following error: C:\Users\nisabbe\Documents\@Doctoraat\R>R CMD check addendum Loading required package: tcltk Loading Tcl/Tk interface ... done Loading

I noticed that we generate code like this for i386 PIC: calll L0$pb L0$pb: popl %eax movl %eax, -24(%ebp) ## 4-byte Spill I worry that this defeats the return address prediction for returns in the function because calls and returns no longer are matched. From Intel's Optimization Reference Manual: "The return address stack mechanism augments the static and dynamic

...> Nine Inch Nails who provide FLAC files. The initial free online release of NIN's The Slip had a problem with the 24-bit version: it wasn't the full 24/96. Turns out it was a genuine oversight by the mastering lab (who used the 24/96 to master the vinyl), and the true 24/96 files were reissued less than a week later. So even with the artist fully behind 24-bit FLAC, and doing almost all of the work in their own studio, things can still go wrong. > People are selling hardware devices in droves, and > they cannot afford to change their firmware every time some random > change...

...> Noise > and some rarer tracks were sourced from MP3 because that was all their > archivist could find. Most of the reissue was direct from analogue > tapes > so this wasn't a quick "shovelware" reissue job. Very interesting. I've purchased many CD titles with reissued material where they clearly did not have access to anything but vinyl for some tracks. It was weird to hear the needle drop, with rumble throughout, especially since I has the original CD versions of the same tracks in my collection. Also, the early days of Warp Records involved many ar...

A hiccup was reported about validating the tarball signature on some systems, so it was reissued from another workstation. Please don't worry :) Jim Klimov On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 01:06 Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > After a prolonged labour with a few re-issues of the tag and many pushes > during the day, NUT v2.8.2 was found in a stran...

Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > A hiccup was reported about validating the tarball signature on some > systems, so it was reissued from another workstation. Please don't worry :) Do you mean the signature was re-issued, which is ok, or that the tarball was re-issued, which is very much not ok(!) ?

A hiccup was reported about validating the tarball signature on some systems, so it was reissued from another workstation. Please don't worry :) Jim Klimov On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 01:06 Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > After a prolonged labour with a few re-issues of the tag and many pushes > during the day, NUT v2.8.2 was found in a stran...

Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > A hiccup was reported about validating the tarball signature on some > systems, so it was reissued from another workstation. Please don't worry :) Do you mean the signature was re-issued, which is ok, or that the tarball was re-issued, which is very much not ok(!) ?

I have referred to the wiki and the RFC, but I still can't find the exact answer I'm looking for. From what I know, Dovecot uses the IMAP standard of 32 bit integers to uniquely identify messages. After a message is deleted from the mbox, can this UID ever be reissued to a new message or is that UID retired? What about after the 2 billion limit is reached? Thanks!

...kages and switch to using mozilla. For more information see RHSA-2004:429-01 Also, in order to easily identify packages which have been modified for CentOS-2, the release suffix .c2.release will be appended to the existing release. All packages which currently are missing this suffix will be reissued with the new suffix. The suffix release will always start at 1 and be incremented if a package needs to be reissues with only centos changes. When the original release is increased, the centos release will start again at 1. This is part of a new automated procedure which should result in rep...

Hi, I'm attempting an one-to-one migration from courier-imap to dovecot-imap. current state: Imap-server has a self signed certificate Every client/user has a self signed client certificate that is used for SSL/TLS client authentication. All certificates are self signed "standalone" cerfificates - no CA hierarchy/structure is made. With courier-imap we could just put every

I need to disable the spin-down on an external USB drive because it spins down spontaneously while in use. The drive forgets the spindown-disable state across power outage so I need to reissue the hdparm command with each boot or hotplug. Where should I put the hdparm command to do this?

I'm receiving the following error over and over, adnauseam: Oct 1 23:59:53 NOTICE[3194]: chan_sip.c:5890 check_auth: stale nonce received from 'CNAME-CID <sip:5551212@192.168.1.X>' Does anyone know what "stale nonce" is? Thanks! Paul Conn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, Just starting out with rsync, and I think I might be missing a fundamental point of how it works. Scenario: I start an rsync daemon on host A, and define a module 'test' on the rsyncd.conf file. 'test' is essentially my home directory on host A I then sign on to host B and issue rsync --progress --recursive --links --stats arthur::test/ /var/tmp/haggis This copies

Hi all. We developped a pv-scsi driver that we refered Fujita-san''s scsi-driver and blkback. (see, http://www.xensource.com/files/xensummit_4/Xen_Summit_8_Matsumoto.pdf) The pv-scsi driver''s feature is as follow: * Guest has dedicated SCSI-HBAs of Dom0. * Guest can send scsi_cdb to the HBAs. * Guest recognises the HBAs from hostno of xenstore. Currentlly, We are

Attached is a prototype patch that uses CCState to lower RET nodes in the ARM target. Lowering CALL nodes will come later. This patch does not handle f64 and i64 types. For these types, it would be ideal to request the conversions below: def RetCC_ARM_APCS : CallingConv<[ CCIfType<[f32], CCBitConvertToType<i32>>, CCIfType<[f64], CCBitConvertToType<i64>>,

Hello, I use snapshot-create-as followed by blockpull when creating external snapshots of VMs. This works well, however I am curious about the behavior of blockpull after an unexpected shutdown (or SIGKILL). If a blockpull is in progress and an unexpected power loss occurs, will the VM continue to reference the backing file for the parts of it that have not yet been copied? Or, will will the disk