search for: reiserfsck

...=/dev/hdd bs=512 count=100000 seek=30000? to simulate a disk surface damage and then run fsck. seek=30000 ? this must be the second half of journal in reiserfs and ext3, for jfs I don't know Result: jfs: ---- total data loss, can't mount, fsck didn't helps reiserfs: --------- doing ?reiserfsck ?rebuild-tree? moves all recovered data in lost+found, but information is almost unusable ext3: ----- after ?fsck.ext3 -f -y? almost everything was usable, directory structure was untouched, some files was moved in lost+found, but in general everything was usable. My opinion: I can't use anyt...

Can anyone point me in the right direction for correcting errors on an HD when using LVM? I've tried e2fsck and indicates bad block. I've tried with -b 8193, 16384, and 32768 and no good. I've found some info about reiserfsck on google, but this utility doesn't seem to be included in Centos4.3. I did find it on my old FC1 box. I am thinking now I really should have went with just regular 83 Linux ext3 partitions. Arrgghhh. And if I want to switch to 83 Linux instead of 8e LVM, whats the best way, or at least a f...

Hi I plan to set up a big file server, something like motherboard with 4 ide ports and an additional 4 ide daughter card, a PIV proc and 512 or 1024 MB ram, a 100 or 1000 MB NIC, with 6 or 7 200 GB ide HDDs in a sigle box. I don't need lightning performance, just disk space. Of course this would be served by some linux os and samba questions (relative to samba configuration and behaviour) :

...=/dev/hdd bs=512 count=100000 seek=30000? to simulate a disk surface damage and then run fsck. seek=30000 ? this must be the second half of journal in reiserfs and ext3, for jfs I don't know Result: jfs: ---- total data loss, can't mount, fsck didn't helps reiserfs: --------- doing ?reiserfsck ?rebuild-tree? moves all recovered data in lost+found, but information is almost unusable ext3: ----- after ?fsck.ext3 -f -y? almost everything was usable, directory structure was untouched, some files was moved in lost+found, but in general everything was usable. My opinion: I can't use anyt...

Hello, we have installed Redhat Linux 6.2 with kernel 2.2.14-12 later we changed to kernel version to 2.4.17. we have installed 'fsck' programs that is tune2fs,e2fsck. Accordding to your documents it should create '.journal ' file at / directory but in our case it not creating '.jornal' file. This '.jornal' file is required to change ext2 file system to ext3 file

...inux 2.10o # fdformat --version o modutils 2.4.2 # insmod -V -o e2fsprogs 1.19 # tune2fs +o e2fsprogs 1.25 # tune2fs o reiserfsprogs 3.x.0j # reiserfsck 2>&1|grep reiserfsprogs o pcmcia-cs 3.1.21 # cardmgr -V o PPP 2.4.0 # pppd --version @@ -317,8 +317,7 @@ E2fsprogs --------- -o <http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs-1.19.tar.gz> -o <http:...

...Destroying device model [2010-10-04 15:34:57 5816] INFO (image:626) mydomu device model terminated [2010-10-04 15:34:57 5816] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:2457) Releasing devices I''ve tried using openSUSE 11.2 and 11.3 boot disks and a trk disk to do the ''dd'' or the ''reiserfsck'' having identical results (domU crash). Dom0 kernel is 2.6.34.7-0.3-xen, one of tested kernel is 2.6.34-12-default (openSUSE rescue disk). Some hint about this? What am I missing? Thanks, Valerio Granato _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@l...

Hi, I've heard that for Dovecot/Mailir systems there are filesystems that are optimised for the situation of many small files in one folder. Could I possibly have some feedback on what the recommended filesystems are? I've heard of ReiserFS but was wondering what other options there are and how they compare. If I get a good comprehensive response I'll build a wiki summary page

Hi! I was just wondering how Ext3 and Reiserfs compare. When I reinstalled my server (because of a stupid hacker) I took the opportunity to change to ReiserFS. And I have to say it's really much faster than Ext3. I don't have benchmarks, but for example, stuff like "make dep" on the linux kernel is much faster (even though I had enabled write cache when I was using ext3). So

Hi everyone, I am very excited to see that dom0 pvops is finally coming close to working, so I wanted to give it a try. >From the description it was not clear to me which kernel to chose as base for the patches.hg, so I took the latest (that was ~ 2 weeks ago) kernel on git.kernel.org I could find (post-2.6.28 git tip at that point). I managed to more or less apply all of the patches in the