search for: reinvokes

Running R.app on Mac OS X 10.4 > version _ platform powerpc-apple-darwin8.6.0 arch powerpc os darwin8.6.0 system powerpc, darwin8.6.0 status major 2 minor 3.1 year 2006

Running R.app on Mac OS X 10.4 > version _ platform powerpc-apple-darwin8.6.0 arch powerpc os darwin8.6.0 system powerpc, darwin8.6.0 status major 2 minor 3.1 year 2006

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Nancy <nancydreaming at gmail.com> wrote: >> First, you could switch to ld.gold instead of ld.bfd. It uses much > $ln -s `which gold` /usr/local/bin/ld > >> the idea. I think for autoconf you need ".../configure >> --enable-split-dwarf" to use this. >> > $.../configure --enable-targets=x86 --enable-split-dwarf >

Dear group I use "restart" in part of my code, in a way that's not easily changed to "try". As I convert code from R1.5.0 to R1.6.1, I'm getting ugly messages; the help system says to contact r-devel, so here I am. This one's a bit complicated-- sorry! The context is inside a debugger (I have an R and S debugger that offers stand-alone code windows, line numbered

thanks for the help ..I could build it with cmake generated project files Being a newbie with cmake one question, is it equivalent to configure in windows environment and so would need to be run everytime I change the source location ? thanks shrey On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:31 PM, shreyas krishnan <shreyas76 at gmail.com> wrote: > done > >

...doing some guinea-pig use of DC just ran into the following situation: 1) He brings up SeaMonkey 2) About 30 minutes later, he's in the middle of some involved messaging, mistakenly hits the redX in the top right of the SeaMonkey window, knocking himself out of SeaMonkey. 3) He immediately reinvokes SeaMonkey, all appeared to be OK Viewed some e-mail and some web page references, tries to send a message and then the Send hung for a time with a message "Sending Authenticate Info"..after some minutes, a new E-mail window appeared stating the "Server reported a timeout". As...

Ah, thanks... curious, that set of instructions recommends running make in place (in the combined llvm directory), instead of in a separate directory as when building llvm without clang. Anyway, following those instructions (substituting unpacking the tar files for the svn checkout) gets me a .sln file (the resulting makefile doesn't work, but the .sln does), in which the build all command

done http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5331 shrey On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > shreyas krishnan <shreyas76 at gmail.com> writes: > >>     I am running into bunch of windows build issues. Can someone >> please provide help on what might be going wrong >> >> >>

Russell Wallace <russell.wallace at gmail.com> writes: > Okay; it doesn't seem to build with cmake, though? > > C:\d\clang>\cmake-2.8.0-win32-x86\bin\cmake.exe c:\d\clang-2.7 > -- Building for: NMake Makefiles Follow the instructions for building clang: http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html [snip]

Hi, > What should I do to make debug enabled compiling successful? Anyone > can tell me a tiny configuration which can save memory? I only have 3G > RAM, Ubuntu kylin. 3GB is probably going to be painful no matter what you do, but there are a few things to try. First, you could switch to ld.gold instead of ld.bfd. It uses much less memory when linking. It can also be helpful to reduce

Russell Wallace <russell.wallace at gmail.com> writes: > Ah, thanks... curious, that set of instructions recommends running > make in place (in the combined llvm directory), instead of in a > separate directory as when building llvm without clang. It doesn't *recommend* running cmake in-source. It is just that the instructions are written that way. When generating VS solution

Hi; I wrote an LLVM transformation pass and I put my code inside the llvm-src/lib/Transforms/my-pass directory. I want to know what is the correct method for compiling it and building my plugin for the pass. After reading the http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html page, I felt that I have to keep my pass inside the above said directory. But when I run make from inside my-pass directory

Responding to the original email... On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:10 PM, James Y Knight <foom at fuhm.net> wrote: > In working on an LLVM backend for SBCL (a lisp compiler), there are > certain sequences of code that must be atomic with regards to async > signals. Can you define exactly what 'atomic with regards to async signals' this entails? Your descriptions led me to think

Thunderbird (2.0) is all of a sudden checking mail server capabilities and keep posting a popup saying: "Mail Server imap.bard.edu is not an IMAP4 mail server". To the best of my knowledge, neither Tbird nor DC have been updated, though the DC imap host was rebooted today 3 hours ago. Any info on what this is about? DC is currently serving out of a special port and in evaluation

...PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > I'm actually pretty leery of using the CMake cross-compiling support because it requires using multiple build directories with split build systems. We end up a situation where the parent build shells out to cmake and then recursively reinvokes the parent build system on the new build directory. Running cmake again in the first place is really slow (lots of test compiles in serial), and recursively invoking the build system leads to really bad job scheduling on all build systems other than 'make'. In particular, ninja shelling out...

LLVMDev, PR 15732 is the umbrella tracking the progress of making the CMake build system feature equivalent to the autotools one. One of the biggest outstanding tasks is PR 21562, which I've been viewing more as a "We really need to fix how we build Compiler-RT." I've thought about this quite a bit, and I wanted to send out some of my ideas to get some feedback and have some

On Jan 4, 2010, at 4:35 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > Responding to the original email... > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:10 PM, James Y Knight <foom at fuhm.net> wrote: >> In working on an LLVM backend for SBCL (a lisp compiler), there are >> certain sequences of code that must be atomic with regards to async >> signals. > > Can you define exactly what

In working on an LLVM backend for SBCL (a lisp compiler), there are certain sequences of code that must be atomic with regards to async signals. So, for example, on x86, a single SUB on a memory location should be used, not a load/sub/store sequence. LLVM's IR doesn't currently have any way to express this kind of constraint (...and really, that's essentially impossible since

On 11/22/19 1:53 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > To avoid breaking existing plugins, Python plugins wishing to use > version 2 of the API must opt in by declaring: > > def api_version(): > return 2 > > (Plugins which do not do this are assumed to want API version 1). Could we also permit the python code to declare a global variable instead of a function? But a

Hi All, I've been having a little trouble with creating a loop that will run a a series of t.tests for inspection, Below is the code i've tried, and some checks i've looked at. I've used the get(paste()) idea as i was told previously that the use of the eval should try and be avoided. I've run a single syntax to check that my systax is correct and works without any problems