search for: reinject

On qemu 1.1.2: qemu-system-x86_64: -no-kvm-pit-reinjection: invalid option Thanks: josv @ IRC --- lib/launch-direct.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/launch-direct.c b/lib/launch-direct.c index efedf92..db9b9f3 100644 --- a/lib/launch-direct.c +++ b/lib/launch-direct.c @@ -414,10 +414,7 @@ launch_direct (gue...

...--git a/src/launch-direct.c b/src/launch-direct.c index 6eaee63..c091732 100644 --- a/src/launch-direct.c +++ b/src/launch-direct.c @@ -491,7 +491,14 @@ launch_direct (guestfs_h *g, void *datav, const char *arg) */ ADD_CMDLINE ("-no-hpet"); #endif - ADD_CMDLINE ("-no-kvm-pit-reinjection"); + if (data->qemu_version_major < 1 || + (data->qemu_version_major == 1 && data->qemu_version_minor <= 2)) + ADD_CMDLINE ("-no-kvm-pit-reinjection"); + else { + /* New non-deprecated way, added in qemu >= 1.3. */ + ADD_CMDLINE ("-gl...

...licate mails. There were still several hundreds of mails awaiting delivery to this list. I have removed all of those from the mail queue - so if you are missing a mail you have sent, please resubmit it, it probably was lost while I cleaned the queue as I had no way of telling those apart from the reinjections. I am sorry that I had to do that, but I am sure that you'd rather resubmit than receiving close to 1000 duplicate mails. The user reinjecting the mails has been identified and shot^Wbanned from the mailing list, he cannot resubscribe. Apologies if this caused any inconveniences. Regard...

Hello, I am using the IMQ with iptables (latest versions) and asking all packets to be enqueued to IMQ0 from both prerouting and postrouting (using different iptables rules to mark different streams). When I do this I get the kernel saying: "Dead loop on netdevice imq0, fix it urgently!" and communications stop intermittently. If I remove the jump from either preroute or postroute it

...ear list members (especially Xen network wizards), I''m using the netfilter_queue mechanism to modify packets on the wire that are sent from one domU to another while they travel over the dom0 bridge. This has worked fine as long as I was tinkering with UDP packets only - but when I try to reinject TCP frames with an increased length, I run into a BUG() because net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c:nfqnl_mangle() calls skb_put() which requires the skb to be aligned, which it apparently isn''t in a Xen environment. I''ve ported my network scenario to a Usermode Linux setup and it...

...all seems to work with eachother. When I add dovecot-antispam in the mix, the following problem occurs: New mail arrives, postfix hands the mail to dspam using a content_filter, and dspam clasifies the mail, running as the dspam user. Dspam writes its data away in a sqlite database. Mail then gets reinjected into postfix and delivered to the system user by deliver. When I manually classify a mail using dovecot-antispam, dovecot runs dspam classification as the system user. This gives the error "failed to call dspam" in my client, and the message "dspam[20203]: query error: attempt to...

...gt; IIRC. We could probably do the same here. IIRC there was a way for a > normal Linux mmap'ed device region to trap individual accesses too, > so we could just use that one too. > > The slow path emulation would then happen magically in QEMU, since > MMIO writes will get reinjected into the normal QEMU MMIO handling > path which will just issue a read/write on the mmap'ed region if it's > not declared as emulated. I agree that's what should happen by default, but there should be a way for root to tell vfio that a device is allowed to overmap, in ord...

...gt; IIRC. We could probably do the same here. IIRC there was a way for a > normal Linux mmap'ed device region to trap individual accesses too, > so we could just use that one too. > > The slow path emulation would then happen magically in QEMU, since > MMIO writes will get reinjected into the normal QEMU MMIO handling > path which will just issue a read/write on the mmap'ed region if it's > not declared as emulated. I agree that's what should happen by default, but there should be a way for root to tell vfio that a device is allowed to overmap, in ord...

Hi! I'm trying to increase security on my FreeBSD 4.8 firewall/DSL router/VPN router. My problem is with firewalling the VPN part. I'm using a tunnel to a RedHat 7.1 box running FreeS/WAN. This tunnel allows traffic from my internal net (172.17.0.0/24) to that box only: spdadd 172.17.0.0/24 $REDHAT/32 any -P out ipsec esp/tunnel/$MYADDR-$REDHAT/unique; spdadd $REDHAT/32 172.17.0.0/24

...vm -m 512 -smp 1,sockets=1,cores=1,threads=1 -uuid 12716b13-001c-40de-9537-ca847aead70b -nodefconfig -nodefaults -chardev socket,id=charmonitor,path=/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/instance-0000001b.monitor,server,nowait -mon chardev=charmonitor,id=monitor,mode=control -rtc base=utc,driftfix=slew -no-kvm-pit-reinjection -kernel /usr/local/nova/instances/instance-0000001b/kernel -initrd /usr/local/nova/instances/instance-0000001b/ramdisk -append root=/dev/vda console=ttyS0 -device piix3-usb-uhci,id=usb,bus=pci.0,addr=0x1.0x2 -drive file=/usr/local/nova/instances/instance-0000001b/disk,if=none,id=drive-virtio-dis...

On 04/27/2017 04:31 PM, Stefano Ricci wrote: > Here is the backtrace of the libvirt process just started [Just a side note, you shouldn't top post on technical lists. Gmail sucks at this.] > > https://pastebin.com/R66myzFp Looks like libvirtd is trying to spawn /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 but it takes ages to init. In the debug logs you might see the actual command line that

...en the host kicks our input queue. > + * > + * This is to enable notifications from host to guest. */ > +static void virtio_fb_input(struct virtqueue *vq) > +{ > + struct virtio_fb_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(&vq->vdev->dev); > + int len, i; > + void *x; > + void *reinject[3]; > + int reinject_count = 0; > + > + while ((x = vq->vq_ops->get_buf(vq, &len)) != NULL) && reinject_count < 3? > { This looks unsafe: can this get triggered while another routine does add_buf? If yes you must add locking to prevent this. > + struct virti...

...en the host kicks our input queue. > + * > + * This is to enable notifications from host to guest. */ > +static void virtio_fb_input(struct virtqueue *vq) > +{ > + struct virtio_fb_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(&vq->vdev->dev); > + int len, i; > + void *x; > + void *reinject[3]; > + int reinject_count = 0; > + > + while ((x = vq->vq_ops->get_buf(vq, &len)) != NULL) && reinject_count < 3? > { This looks unsafe: can this get triggered while another routine does add_buf? If yes you must add locking to prevent this. > + struct virti...

...name": "system_powerdown"}, {"name": "stop"}, > {"name": "set_password"}, {"name": "set_link"}, {"name": "send-key"}, > {"name": "screendump"}, {"name": "rtc-reset-reinjection"}, {"name": > "ringbuf-write"}, {"name": "ringbuf-read"}, {"name": "remove-fd"}, > {"name": "quit"}, {"name": "query-vnc-servers"}, {"name": > "query-vnc"}, {&quo...

...st to make sure I understand the case here. What did rx.B mean here? I >> thought all traffic sent by Sender B has been redirected to ifb0? > It has been, but the packet still arrives at the destination socket. > IFB is a special virtual device that applies traffic shaping and > then reinjects it back at the point it was intercept by mirred. > > rx.B is indeed arrival rate at the receiver, similar to rx.A. > I see, then ifb looks pretty fit to the test.

...st to make sure I understand the case here. What did rx.B mean here? I >> thought all traffic sent by Sender B has been redirected to ifb0? > It has been, but the packet still arrives at the destination socket. > IFB is a special virtual device that applies traffic shaping and > then reinjects it back at the point it was intercept by mirred. > > rx.B is indeed arrival rate at the receiver, similar to rx.A. > I see, then ifb looks pretty fit to the test.

I try to redeliver mail for the following reason: Once in a while a user receives a mail which isn't correctly recognised as SPAM/HAM. He'll move the mail into a specific folder (say: retrain-as-spam/retrain-as-ham) and a script will retrain the mail. What I'd like to do is to redeliver the mail in order for correct (re)delivery (e.g. sieve scripts). Using sendmail to redeliver the

...re running. For example the kvm134: ]# ps ax|grep kvm134 8313 ? Sl 3671:51 /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -S -M rhel5.4.0 -m 1536 -smp 1,sockets=1,cores=1,threads=1 -name kvm134 -uuid f74f0b83-854a-b22f-36bd-a5ee906926e3 -monitor unix:/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/kvm134.monitor,server,nowait -no-kvm-pit-reinjection -boot cd -drive file=/dev/vps/kvm134_img,if=ide,bus=0,unit=0,boot=on,format=raw -drive file=/home/solusvm/kvm/iso/CentOS-5.5-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso,if=ide,media=cdrom,bus=1,unit=0,readonly=on,format=raw -net nic,macaddr=00:16:3b:0c:a1:a5,vlan=0,model=e1000 -net tap,fd=17,vlan=0 -net nic,macaddr=00:1...

...rtual/domains.net/user Amavis delivers quarantine mail to /var/spool/mail/quarantine I would like one user (postmaster) to have a folder /var/spool/mail/virtual/domains.net/postmaster/.Quarantine and link it to that folder - is that possible? Is it safe? The client the postmaster uses can then reinject and deliver the mail if need be (i.e. it's safe or the attachment has been stripped). Thanks. Simon

...: wishlist Hi, after upgrading Postfix from 2.7.1-1 to 2.8.1-1 (using testing) parts of the log format from postfix/smtpd have changed. This problem only seems to trigger when accepting connections in smtpd using XFORWARD (http://www.postfix.org/XFORWARD_README.html), for example when Amavisd-new reinjects mail to postfix. The new log lines look like this: Mar 9 15:15:53 hostname postfix/smtpd[5100]: 056DA13C1C0: client=localhost[127.0.0.1], orig_client=host.domain.tld[1.2.3.4] In version 2.7.1-1, the whole orig_client part was missing. Please adjust the rules for Postfix accordingly. Best reg...