search for: reinforcing

Hi everyone, I've been bashing my head against this for days now, and can't figure out what to do. I have the following dataframe header appetitive stimulus aversive stimulus chaining contingency discriminative stimulus extinction intermittent reinforcement negative reinforcer operant response place learning positive reinforcer punishment reinforcement

Hi, I am wondering if there is a parameter in library() so that it can reinforce package to be reloaded. It helps when you test your modified package by yourself. Otherwise, my way is to re-start Rgui. (by reading ?library, I understand this option is not implemented) "...Both functions check and update the list of currently loaded packages and do not reload a package which is already

Hi, I am wondering if there is a parameter in library() so that it can reinforce package to be reloaded. It helps when you test your modified package by yourself. Otherwise, my way is to re-start Rgui. (by reading ?library, I understand this option is not implemented) "...Both functions check and update the list of currently loaded packages and do not reload a package which is already

Hi everyone, I'm quite new to LLVM *and doing a Q-learning *(*just a hobby*)* on register allocation for LLVM. RegAllocRL is based on* *RegAllocBase*,* RegAllocBasic and add some feature to implement Q-learning algorithm. * *I*’*ve currently run as MachineFunctionPass and things seem to work in simple case. In order to make progress on training*, *I have questions and want to get some

Hello, a short question: I cannot find the Rcmd file in the my installed Windows R Program. It is not known as a command inside R (which is not intended as I suppose) nor as an executable or similar file elsewhere? How can I make my own package? Holger -- PD Dr. habil. Holger Perlt Diplomphysiker/Gesch?ftsf?hrer Reinforcement Control GmbH Karl-Heine-Str. 99 04229 Leipzig Germany Phone: ++49

Hello, I am new as R user. After reading the manual I did not understand one thing: Is it possible to write a stand-alone C-program (e.g. with its own GUI etc.) using R functions inside? (via the R.dll in the Windows case) I understand that it is possible to write C-code to be used inside R, which 1. do not use R-functions itself (called with .C) 2. do use R-structures inside (called with

Obligatory: When will Centos 5.4 be ready? /me goes down into reinforced concrete bunker and locks all hatches and doors.

I've been trying to understand the current state of subtargets and subtarget features in LLVM. It seems like the presence of "target-cpu" and "target-features" attributes on IR functions are currently intended to take precedence over the module-level (TargetMachine) versions. See X86TargetMachine::getSubtargetImpl for an example of this. However, this feels like it is

...ng test in cast-int-fcmp-eq-0.ll fails: ; CHECK-LABEL: @i32_cast_cmp_oeq_int_n0_uitofp( ; CHECK: uitofp ; CHECK: fcmp oeq define i1 @i32_cast_cmp_oeq_int_n0_uitofp(i32 %i) { %f = uitofp i32 %i to float %cmp = fcmp oeq float %f, -0.0 ret i1 %cmp } Is this test really justified, or is it just reinforcing an oversight? - Arch D. Robison -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150706/d575d72e/attachment.html>

Hi, just chiming in here... Óscar Fuentes wrote: > [...] > > This is a simple guide for using cmake with LLVM: > > http://www.llvm.org/docs/CMake.html > > The makefiles distributed with LLVM have nothing to do with cmake. >From the few times I tried building LLVM with CMake I got the impression that it wasn't completely mature yet (the "TODO" sections in

TL;DR; We can improve compiler optimizations driven by heuristics by replacing those heuristics with machine-learned policies (ML models). Policies are trained offline and ship as part of the compiler. Determinism is maintained because models are fixed when the compiler is operating in production. Fine-tuning or regressions may be handled by incorporating the interesting cases in the ML training

It turns out it's me, sorry. Let me see how I can sort this out. In the meantime, here is the csv: SPEC2006 data: binary,base -Oz size,ML -Oz size,ML size shrink by,,perf: base -Oz scores,perf: ML -Oz scores,ML improvement by 400.perlbench,2054200,2086776,-1.59%,,2.9,2.9,0.00% 401.bzip2,1129976,1095544,3.05%,,6.4,6.2,-3.13% 403.gcc,4078488,4130840,-1.28%,,11.6,11.7,0.86%

+Yundi Qian <yundi at google.com> +Eugene Brevdo <ebrevdo at google.com> , our team members from the ML side. To avoid formatting issues, here is a link to the RFC <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BoSGQlmgAh-yUZMn4sCDoWuY6KWed2tV58P4_472mDE/edit?usp=sharing>, open to comments. Thanks! On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:34 PM Mircea Trofin <mtrofin at google.com> wrote: >

Wine & Access to Com1 Port for Rig Control I am attempting to control an amateur radio transceiver using its own program ... which works under windows98 and newer. As I am a linux user I want to avoid having a windows installation for just one program. The details are as follwos: rig: Tentec Pegasus computer: PC-type with 2+ GHz processor and 512 Meg of RAM software: Sidux (2008.1) +

On Nov 1, 2013, at 12:15 PM, David Peixotto <dpeixott at codeaurora.org> wrote: >>>>> I was thinking that without the .ltorg directive the constant pool >>>>> would go at the end of the section. >>>>> >>>> So where does the assembler place the constant pool(s) if that >>>> directive isn't present? I was under the

Sorry, I wasn't aware of that. I can make the google doc view-only, keeping the current comments. I'll wait a bit (few hrs) to see if there's any pushback to that. On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 9:57 AM Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com> wrote: > One suggestion : should we consolidate the discussion into the main > thread? I know some folks are not willing to comment in

Dear All, I will soon be working with NIH and possibly FDA. Will I be able to use R or will I be forced to use SAS? Cheers, Federico -- Federico C. F. Calboli Department of Epidemiology and Public Health Imperial College, St. Mary's Campus Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG Tel +44 (0)20 75941602 Fax +44 (0)20 75943193 f.calboli [.a.t] imperial.ac.uk f.calboli [.a.t] gmail.com

Hi all, I just used power.t.test() in Version 1.9.0 beta (2004-03-31) today under FC1. The following is the output: > power.t.test(delta = .5, power = .95, type = "paired") $n [1] 53.94062 $delta [1] 0.5 $sd [1] 1 $sig.level [1] 0.05 $power [1] 0.95 $alternative [1] "two.sided" $note [1] "n is number of *pairs*, sd is std.dev. of *differences* within

On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:22:49 -0500 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed Jan 24 05:03:25 2024 Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:07:35 -0500 > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon Jan 22 11:00:59 2024 Mark Foley via samba

> There's still a problem for Darwin, or any other platform that use > subsections-via-symbols type layout tricks, though. There's no assembler- > time way to know how far apart the atoms in the section will be at > runtime, as the linker can, and will, move things around. Hmm, yes that does sound quite tricky. How do we currently deal with that for other pc-relative loads.