search for: reinforcement

Hi everyone, I've been bashing my head against this for days now, and can't figure out what to do. I have the following dataframe header appetitive stimulus aversive stimulus chaining contingency discriminative stimulus extinction intermittent reinforcement negative reinforcer operant response place learning positive reinforcer punishment reinforcement schedules response rate secondary reinforcement spontaneous recovery variance spontaneous recovery -3 -2 0 -3 -3 -16 -5 1 16 -1 7 1 -1 1...

Hi, I am wondering if there is a parameter in library() so that it can reinforce package to be reloaded. It helps when you test your modified package by yourself. Otherwise, my way is to re-start Rgui. (by reading ?library, I understand this option is not implemented) "...Both functions check and update the list of currently loaded packages and do not reload a package which is already

Hi, I am wondering if there is a parameter in library() so that it can reinforce package to be reloaded. It helps when you test your modified package by yourself. Otherwise, my way is to re-start Rgui. (by reading ?library, I understand this option is not implemented) "...Both functions check and update the list of currently loaded packages and do not reload a package which is already

Hi everyone, I'm quite new to LLVM *and doing a Q-learning *(*just a hobby*)* on register allocation for LLVM. RegAllocRL is based on* *RegAllocBase*,* RegAllocBasic and add some feature to implement Q-learning algorithm. * *I*’*ve currently run as MachineFunctionPass and things seem to work in simple case. In order to make progress on training*, *I have questions and want to get some

...stion: I cannot find the Rcmd file in the my installed Windows R Program. It is not known as a command inside R (which is not intended as I suppose) nor as an executable or similar file elsewhere? How can I make my own package? Holger -- PD Dr. habil. Holger Perlt Diplomphysiker/Gesch?ftsf?hrer Reinforcement Control GmbH Karl-Heine-Str. 99 04229 Leipzig Germany Phone: ++49 (0)341 9410370 Fax: ++49 (0)341 9410372 http://www.reinforcement.de -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send &qu...

...R, which 1. do not use R-functions itself (called with .C) 2. do use R-structures inside (called with .Call) Is this right? Are there very simple introductionary examples for my case - if this is possible at all? Best regards, Holger -- PD Dr. habil. Holger Perlt Diplomphysiker/Gesch?ftsf?hrer Reinforcement Control GmbH Karl-Heine-Str. 99 04229 Leipzig Germany Phone: ++49 (0)341 9410370 Fax: ++49 (0)341 9410372 http://www.reinforcement.de -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send &qu...

Obligatory: When will Centos 5.4 be ready? /me goes down into reinforced concrete bunker and locks all hatches and doors.

I've been trying to understand the current state of subtargets and subtarget features in LLVM. It seems like the presence of "target-cpu" and "target-features" attributes on IR functions are currently intended to take precedence over the module-level (TargetMachine) versions. See X86TargetMachine::getSubtargetImpl for an example of this. However, this feels like it is

In InstCombineCompares.cpp, routine InstCombiner::FoldFCmp_IntToFP_Cst, there are these lines: // Comparisons with zero are a special case where we know we won't lose // information. bool IsCmpZero = RHS.isPosZero(); // If the conversion would lose info, don't hack on this. if ((int)InputSize > MantissaWidth && !IsCmpZero) return nullptr; Why check for positive

Hi, just chiming in here... Óscar Fuentes wrote: > [...] > > This is a simple guide for using cmake with LLVM: > > http://www.llvm.org/docs/CMake.html > > The makefiles distributed with LLVM have nothing to do with cmake. >From the few times I tried building LLVM with CMake I got the impression that it wasn't completely mature yet (the "TODO" sections in

...nly-manageable size, which potentially affects the generality of a heuristic or heuristic tuning. The main advantage of manual heuristics is arguably their relatively lower overhead: no additional dependencies and more transparent to human analysis and improvement. Machine learning, in particular reinforcement learning, can address the tensions found in manual heuristics: once features are extracted from the program, the way they are combined and tuned can easily be scaled up through automation, improving effectiveness and generality. A major drawback, at least at this point in time, of machine learning,...

...ic or heuristic tuning. > > > > The main advantage of manual heuristics is arguably their relatively > lower > > overhead: no additional dependencies and more transparent to human > analysis > > and improvement. > > > > Machine learning, in particular reinforcement learning, can address the > > tensions found in manual heuristics: once features are extracted from > the > > program, the way they are combined and tuned can easily be scaled up > > through automation, improving effectiveness and generality. A major > > drawback, at...

...e main advantage of manual heuristics is arguably their relatively >>> lower >>> > overhead: no additional dependencies and more transparent to human >>> analysis >>> > and improvement. >>> > >>> > Machine learning, in particular reinforcement learning, can address >>> the >>> > tensions found in manual heuristics: once features are extracted from >>> the >>> > program, the way they are combined and tuned can easily be scaled up >>> > through automation, improving effectiveness and...

Wine & Access to Com1 Port for Rig Control I am attempting to control an amateur radio transceiver using its own program ... which works under windows98 and newer. As I am a linux user I want to avoid having a windows installation for just one program. The details are as follwos: rig: Tentec Pegasus computer: PC-type with 2+ GHz processor and 512 Meg of RAM software: Sidux (2008.1) +

On Nov 1, 2013, at 12:15 PM, David Peixotto <dpeixott at codeaurora.org> wrote: >>>>> I was thinking that without the .ltorg directive the constant pool >>>>> would go at the end of the section. >>>>> >>>> So where does the assembler place the constant pool(s) if that >>>> directive isn't present? I was under the

...gt;> relatively >>>>> lower >>>>> > overhead: no additional dependencies and more transparent to human >>>>> analysis >>>>> > and improvement. >>>>> > >>>>> > Machine learning, in particular reinforcement learning, can address >>>>> the >>>>> > tensions found in manual heuristics: once features are extracted >>>>> from the >>>>> > program, the way they are combined and tuned can easily be scaled up >>>>> > through...

Dear All, I will soon be working with NIH and possibly FDA. Will I be able to use R or will I be forced to use SAS? Cheers, Federico -- Federico C. F. Calboli Department of Epidemiology and Public Health Imperial College, St. Mary's Campus Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG Tel +44 (0)20 75941602 Fax +44 (0)20 75943193 f.calboli [.a.t] imperial.ac.uk f.calboli [.a.t] gmail.com

Hi all, I just used power.t.test() in Version 1.9.0 beta (2004-03-31) today under FC1. The following is the output: > power.t.test(delta = .5, power = .95, type = "paired") $n [1] 53.94062 $delta [1] 0.5 $sd [1] 1 $sig.level [1] 0.05 $power [1] 0.95 $alternative [1] "two.sided" $note [1] "n is number of *pairs*, sd is std.dev. of *differences* within

On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:22:49 -0500 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed Jan 24 05:03:25 2024 Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:07:35 -0500 > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon Jan 22 11:00:59 2024 Mark Foley via samba

> There's still a problem for Darwin, or any other platform that use > subsections-via-symbols type layout tricks, though. There's no assembler- > time way to know how far apart the atoms in the section will be at > runtime, as the linker can, and will, move things around. Hmm, yes that does sound quite tricky. How do we currently deal with that for other pc-relative loads.