search for: reinaldo

...inbox. As a side-effect of the cryptography, my plugin changes the size of the message, but until 2.0.19 this works well with dovecot index and the W/S flags. But now, i'm going to upgrade to 2.1.17 and now i have these messages on log at my test ambiance: Oct 15 20:19:25 test dovecot: imap(reinaldo at exemplo.com.br): Error: Cached message size smaller than expected (367 < 529) Oct 15 20:19:25 test dovecot: imap(reinaldo at exemplo.com.br): Error: Maildir filename has wrong S value, renamed the file from /storage/test/messages/exemplo.com.br/reinaldo/Maildir/.Sent/cur/1381879158.M634385P52...

...browser - it leaves a trash file named "transferd-file:Zone.Identifier" or "tranferd-file:encryptable". The odd thing is that from Windows I can`t read/write/delete these files. They appear with names like "hdje2423". Any help will be apreciated. Thanks in advance. Reinaldo Silva reinaldosilva@ufmg.br reinaldo.silva@gmail.com

Hi, Tim Not even one ocurrence of "wins support" on my smb.conf -----Mensagem original----- De: Tim Kelley [mailto:tpk@r00tserverz.net] Enviada em: s?bado, 18 de outubro de 2003 11:09 Para: Reinaldo Brand?o Gomes Cc: samba@samba.org Assunto: Re: [Samba] Nmbd in a infinite loop, doing nothing and sucking 99%CPU (really) On Saturday 18 October 2003 9:03 am, Reinaldo Brand?o Gomes wrote: > Hello, > Have some clue on what can be happening? > Hmm ... in your smb.conf files, how many bo...

...ort things like ssh, sftp, and nfs but that is separate from samba's "Windows" services. Or do you mean it forwards NTLM requests to a different server ? Disabling NTLM altogether would be a useful feature if you are trying to minimize the attack surface. On 10/10/18 15:52, Reinaldo Souza Gomes via samba wrote: >  Forgive me if I have misundertood your words, but what I want is to prevent Samba from accepting NTLM(v1, v2, SSP, or whatever) and forwarding it, since SSSD does not support it. I am not trying to get SSSD to support any kind of NTLM. So, this would be a Samba is...

...do (preferrably on the Samba server) to prevent windows clients from successfully sending NTLM authentication to my Samba server? Em quarta-feira, 10 de outubro de 2018 16:29:28 BRT, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu: On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 18:50:23 +0000 (UTC) Reinaldo Souza Gomes via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > How can I make sure that NTLM(SSP) will never be used?? > > I’ve set up Samba with SSSD and everything Works fine... except for a > few Windows machines which every now and then happen to send NTLM > authenticati...

...      I think NTLMv2 is supported as far back as NT 4.0 SP6.         Windows 2000 and later should be trying to use kerberos in preference to NTLM.   By chance have you disabled NTLMv2 and only enabled v1?      Are some windows clients failing while others succeeding ? On 10/10/18 16:38, Reinaldo Souza Gomes wrote: > Whenever a client uses kerberos as authentication, it succeeds. > > Whenever a client uses NTLM as authentication, it fails (logs bellow) > since SSSD can't support NTLM. Thus my question: what can I do to > prevent NTLM from being used?? > > [2018/10...

...and idmap caches ? Probably NOT related but I had issues with Windows 10 and SMB3 in the past so you may want to try minimizing variables with         server max protocol = SMB2         server min protocol = SMB2 I haven't had the displeasure of using Windows 8. On 10/10/18 19:15, Reinaldo Souza Gomes wrote: > This issue right here told me exactly what I needed to understand this > authentication process: > https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3228 > > > - The client talks to the DC to try and get a cifs ticket for my samba > server's princpal name; > - In...

...86_64" package for CentOS, as this post suggests(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963341), but it didn't help. Anyway, as far as Samba goes, I think this is as far as you guys could help me. Thank you for your attention. Em quarta-feira, 10 de outubro de 2018 18:27:50 BRT, Reinaldo Souza Gomes via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu:   The domain controler is Windows. The file Server is Linux/Samba. The clients are Windows. I've tested the access on a dozen different windows machines. Three of them used NTLM and failed. All the others used kerberos and su...

...and idmap caches ? Probably NOT related but I had issues with Windows 10 and SMB3 in the past so you may want to try minimizing variables with         server max protocol = SMB2         server min protocol = SMB2 I haven't had the displeasure of using Windows 8. On 10/10/18 19:15, Reinaldo Souza Gomes wrote: > This issue right here told me exactly what I needed to understand this > authentication process: > https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3228 > > > - The client talks to the DC to try and get a cifs ticket for my samba > server's princpal name; > - In...

...euser" then I would likely have problems. if nsswitch.conf is configured to use sssd, and sssd is configured to retrieve account info from the domain server (either via windows or ldap ) then I would think that "getent passwd" should be listing users. On 10/11/18 10:13, Reinaldo Souza Gomes wrote: > There are roughly 20 DC's, spread across multiple different physical > locations. It is indeed a replication issue. All of them are windows > and we can get authenticated by any of them, randomly. Don't ask me > why... they're managed by the "win...

...      I think NTLMv2 is supported as far back as NT 4.0 SP6.         Windows 2000 and later should be trying to use kerberos in preference to NTLM.   By chance have you disabled NTLMv2 and only enabled v1?      Are some windows clients failing while others succeeding ? On 10/10/18 16:38, Reinaldo Souza Gomes wrote: > Whenever a client uses kerberos as authentication, it succeeds. > > Whenever a client uses NTLM as authentication, it fails (logs bellow) > since SSSD can't support NTLM. Thus my question: what can I do to > prevent NTLM from being used?? > > [2018/10...

...ort things like ssh, sftp, and nfs but that is separate from samba's "Windows" services. Or do you mean it forwards NTLM requests to a different server ? Disabling NTLM altogether would be a useful feature if you are trying to minimize the attack surface. On 10/10/18 15:52, Reinaldo Souza Gomes via samba wrote: > Forgive me if I have misundertood your words, but what I want is to prevent Samba from accepting NTLM(v1, v2, SSP, or whatever) and forwarding it, since SSSD does not support it. I am not trying to get SSSD to support any kind of NTLM. So, this would be a Samba i...

...sn't start, but if I just plug a PC on this machine net, the nmbd imediatelly starts and goes up to 99%CPU utilization. I can say that nothing was changed in the machines, and we've had this version of samba (5) working for almost 10 years so far. Have some clue on what can be happening? Reinaldo .'. Linux /V\ Dont Fear The Penguin // \\ rbgomes@mmsi.com /( )\ ^^-^^

...modified over the last 8 years. The OS is solaris 7, and we have mainly windows clients. But doing one test with smbclient from another sun running solaris 7 gives no response. I really would appreciate any help or comments or question in order to understand/troubleshoot this problem. Thanks, Reinaldo

How can I make sure that NTLM(SSP) will never be used?? I’ve set up Samba with SSSD and everything Works fine... except for a few Windows machines which every now and then happen to send NTLM authentication flags to the Samba server, which happily forwards them. And then the authentication fails because SSSD doesn’t support NTLM. I’ve tried all sorts of parameters combination on smb.conf

...are/lib/zoneinfo/GMT", O_RDONLY) = 3 read(3, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0".., 8192) = 56 close(3) = 0 -----Mensagem original----- De: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:jerry@samba.org] Enviada em: segunda-feira, 20 de outubro de 2003 11:15 Para: Reinaldo Brand?o Gomes Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Assunto: Re: [Samba] Nmbd in a infinite loop - consuming 99% CPU -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Reinaldo Brand?o Gomes wrote: | Hi, People | | WE are having this problem with nmbd & smbd. The Process, once | started goes by 99%CPU time...

...1 Vary: Accept-Encoding Connection: close 0 ================================ <- this line is to separate this text Although the content-length is set to 1, mongrel (or apache) inserted double line breaks before the original response (as set on rails -> 0) Can anyone help? Thanks in advance Reinaldo -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello. I need to know how I can get the final message file name inside a plugin like the zlib 2.0 plugin. I saw another threads about zlib plugin, but don't see no one asking about this. My interest is to use the message's file name in a specific function that will add some lines on it and, after that, calculate a md5 hash of the modified file. As the size flags will not correspond to

...8061k pedro at pr.copextel.com.cu 17028k marin at pr.copextel.com.cu 16769k mariaj at pr.copextel.com.cu 16762k deisy at pr.copextel.com.cu 16515k yovany_sj at pr.copextel.com.cu 15974k maydelin at pr.copextel.com.cu 15846k perico_man at pr.copextel.com.cu 15762k adonis at pr.copextel.com.cu 15762k reinaldo at pr.copextel.com.cu 15498k arianna at pr.copextel.com.cu 15303k omarm at pr.copextel.com.cu 15105k zadermis at pr.copextel.com.cu 14942k alberto at pr.copextel.com.cu 14823k vicente at pr.copextel.com.cu 14777k josefa at pr.copextel.com.cu 14515k pipito at pr.copextel.com.cu message deferral det...