search for: reimplementing

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 936 matches for "reimplementing".

2012 Mar 11
1
GSOC 2012: Dynamic Snippets and QueryParser Reimplementation
Hello, My name is Sean Mikalson. I am a second year Software Engineering student with a combined degree in Philosophy. I am interested in participating with Xapian in GSOC this year and a couple of projects have initially caught my eye: - Dynamic Snippets - QueryParser Reimplementation I have good working knowledge in C/C++, Java and SQL (specifically Transact-SQL). In order to determine
2018 Dec 29
2
Portable multiplication 64 x 64 -> 128 for int128 reimplementation
Hi, For some maybe dumb reasons I try to write a portable version of int128. What is very valuable for this implementation is access to MUL instruction on x86 which provides full 64 x 64 -> 128 bit multiplication. An equally useful on ARM would be UMULH instruction. Well, the way you can access this on clang / GCC is to use __int128 type or use inline assembly. MSVC provides an intrinsic for
2007 Oct 03
1
Reimplement order somehow
Hello, I have a script in R language that makes sorting using the order() method of R language. What I need is to reimplement this method in any other language (PHP, Perl, Python, Java maybe). First I tried to reimplement it in php, here is some numbers that i need to sort: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,300,231,11,12,0,1 R language: n = c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,300,231,11,12,0,1) n [1] 1 2 3 4 5
2017 Jul 10
0
Re: [PATCH v8 00/42] Refactor utilities and reimplement inspection.
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 19:29:07 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > v7 was: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html > > I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Patches #1-13 LGTM (just with a small fixup needed in patch #7). > Also it now passes a test where I
2017 Jul 20
0
Re: [PATCH 03/27] daemon: Reimplement ‘file’ API in OCaml.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 03:14:48PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > + > > + let statbuf = Chroot.f chroot lstat path in > > Hm is chroot needed for this? The current C implementation does not > use CHROOT_IN/OUT, and it does not even resolve symlinks, so it should > be safe. The implementation is different, but I think it's equivalent and safe. The ‘Chroot’ module
2017 Jul 27
0
Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
On Friday, 21 July 2017 22:36:04 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > v1 -> v2: > > - [lots of changes] Thanks for them. > Requested, but not done for various reasons: > > - Removing GUESTFSD_EXT_CMD. This is still being used by OpenSUSE, so > we'll have to think of a better mechanism for it. Something like > ‘guestfsd --dump-commands’ may work better. Note I
2017 Aug 08
0
Re: [PATCH v11 00/10] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
On Monday, 31 July 2017 17:40:49 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html > > No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series > now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else > needed is upstream. a) I just sent few easy notes, but I did not check most of the rest yet b) in
2018 Feb 19
0
Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] daemon: Reimplement 'part_get_mbr_part_type' API in OCaml.
Richard, 1.38 is out. Can we come back and discuss these patch series? -- Mykola Ivanets 2018-02-06 10:31 GMT+02:00 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:54:19PM +0200, Mykola Ivanets wrote: >> Instead of parsing 'parted' output OCaml implementation relies on the following facts: >> >> 1. The function is applicable for MBR
2018 Feb 20
1
Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] daemon: Reimplement 'part_get_mbr_part_type' API in OCaml.
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:48:39PM +0200, Nikolay Ivanets wrote: > Richard, 1.38 is out. Can we come back and discuss these patch series? Can you repost it, rebased, and taking into account the review comments from last time. Thanks, Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
2015 Jan 01
1
Reimplement stats:::plotNode as iterative to avoid recursion limits?
Hi All, I've gotten a number of reports from users about gplots::heatmap.2 generating 'node stack overflow' errors. As it turns out, these errors originate in stats:::plotNode, and are triggered when it is passed a dendrogram that is too deeply nested. While increasing the stack size (which is a compile-time option for byte coded functions) can allow a particular instance to
2011 Mar 21
1
GSOC 2011 - QueryParser Reimplementation
hello everyone, I am Maheshwar, a prefinal year Computer Science undergraduate student at BITS-Pilani, India. When i was going through the GSOC ideas , i felt interested in Quesry parser project. Till now i have implemented a couple of LL(1) parsers as a part of my assignment in Compiler construction course, so i would love to join and contribute to this project. So can any one tell me how to go
2018 Dec 31
0
[cfe-dev] Portable multiplication 64 x 64 -> 128 for int128 reimplementation
On trunk we never generate MULX. We used to blindly use it anytime bmi2 was enabled, but its a longer encoding and isn't a guaranteed register allocation improvement. So I took it out a few weeks ago. We need a more precise heuristic for when to use it. LLVM trunk will never generate ADCX/ADOX either. This was removed in September. We used to inconsistently generate them when adx was enabled
2017 Jul 20
1
Re: [PATCH 19/27] daemon: Reimplement ‘list_filesystems’ API in the daemon, in OCaml.
On Friday, 14 July 2017 15:39:27 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > +let rec list_filesystems () = > + let has_lvm2 = Lvm.available () in > + let has_ldm = Ldm.available () in > + > + let devices = Devsparts.list_devices () in > + let partitions = Devsparts.list_partitions () in > + let mds = Md.list_md_devices () in > + > + (* Look to see if any devices directly
2018 Feb 06
2
Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] daemon: Reimplement 'part_get_mbr_part_type' API in OCaml.
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:54:19PM +0200, Mykola Ivanets wrote: > Instead of parsing 'parted' output OCaml implementation relies on the following facts: > > 1. The function is applicable for MBR partitions only (as noted in documentation and as function name suggests). This might be how it's documented, but the implementation has a nod towards gpt: > - for (i = 0, row =
2017 Jul 19
2
Re: [PATCH 03/27] daemon: Reimplement ‘file’ API in OCaml.
On Friday, 14 July 2017 15:39:11 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > diff --git a/daemon/file.c b/daemon/file.c > index 84874dc6f..ee79eb507 100644 > --- a/daemon/file.c > +++ b/daemon/file.c > @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ > #include "actions.h" > #include "optgroups.h" > > -GUESTFSD_EXT_CMD(str_file, file); When migrating to OCaml, these extra sections in the
2017 Jul 26
5
[PATCH 0/2] daemon: Reimplement handling of lvm.conf and filters.
Simplify how we handle lvm.conf.
2005 Feb 07
7
win32-driveinfo in CVS
Hi all, I committed win32-driveinfo 0.1.0 to CVS. What is it? =========== A class for getting information of drives Synopsis ======== include Win32::DriveInfo (sectorsPerCluster, bytesPerSector, numberOfFreeClusters, totalNumberOfClusters, freeBytesAvailableToCaller, totalNumberOfBytes, totalNumberOfFreeBytes) = getDriveSpace(''c'').to_a
2017 Jul 14
0
[PATCH 20/27] daemon: Reimplement ‘part_list’ API in OCaml.
--- daemon/parted.c | 56 ----------------------------------------------- daemon/parted.ml | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ daemon/parted.mli | 8 +++++++ generator/actions_core.ml | 1 + 4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/parted.c b/daemon/parted.c index a1e5c81cf..125aec60b 100644 --- a/daemon/parted.c +++
2005 May 25
5
precision problem
I have prices that I am finding difficult to compare with ==, > and >, due to precision. For example: the numbers should match, with '==', but they differ in the magnitude of 1e-14 due to bunch of calculations that I run on them. Programming with java, I am used to implementing a function that compares the difference between the numbers to a pre determined precision factor. This
2020 Mar 13
0
Wine release 5.4
The Wine development release 5.4 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Unicode data updated to Unicode version 13. - Builtin programs use the new UCRTBase C runtime. - More correct support for Internationalized Domain Names. - Support for painting rounded rectangles in Direct2D. - Text drawing in D3DX9. - Various bug fixes. The source is