Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "reieserfs".
Did you mean:
raiserfs
2004 Mar 03
0
Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3
...03-02 at 09:34, Peter Nelson wrote:
>
>
>>Hans Reiser wrote:
>>
>>I'm confused as to why performing a benchmark out of cache as opposed to
>>on disk would hurt performance?
>>
>>
>
>My understanding (which could be completely wrong) is that reieserfs v3
>and v4 are algorithmically more complex than ext2 or ext3. Reiserfs
>spends more CPU time to make the eventual ondisk operations more
>efficient/faster.
>
>When operating purely or mostly out of ram, the higher CPU utilization
>of reiserfs hurts performance compared to ext2 an...
2004 Mar 03
2
Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3
...>>
>>
>>>Hans Reiser wrote:
>>>
>>>I'm confused as to why performing a benchmark out of cache as opposed to
>>>on disk would hurt performance?
>>>
>>>
>>My understanding (which could be completely wrong) is that reieserfs v3
>>and v4 are algorithmically more complex than ext2 or ext3. Reiserfs
>>spends more CPU time to make the eventual ondisk operations more
>>efficient/faster.
>>
>>When operating purely or mostly out of ram, the higher CPU utilization
>>of reiserfs hurts perform...