search for: reidspenc

...Then, please fix it to not use RLIMIT_RSS in the cygwin case. Perhaps you should just use RLIMIT_AS for cygwin. It will trigger sooner than RLIMIT_RSS but that's probably okay. Reid. > > Aaron > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Reid Spencer" <rspencer at reidspencer.com> > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 8:32 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM Cygwin build RLIMIT_RSS configuration problem > > > > Hi Aaaron, > > > > On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 19:50 +00...

...RSS code. There needs to be logic added to config system to complement this. Or shall I just use an #ifdef _CYGWIN_ ? Regarding the Bytecode writer stuff. I will try adding some inline dis-ambiguator functions. Aaron ----- Original Message ----- From: "Reid Spencer" <rspencer at reidspencer.com> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 9:08 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM Cygwin build RLIMIT_RSS configuration problem > Hi Aaron, > > On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 20:43 +0000, Aaron Gray wrote: >> Hi Reid, &...

On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 19:36:01 -0700 Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com> wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > What version of llvm-gcc did you configure LLVM with? If you don't > know, please send your configure.out file from your LLVM_OBJ_ROOT I didn't find that file in the source anywhere. Also, I don't normally use llvm-gcc, so I didn...

...und a typo... In the paragraph after the 3rd code snippet in the 1st question's section: "The second operand will be the field offset" seems like it should be the third operand? The second is the pointer offset... HTH! =] -Chandler Carruth On 8/15/06, Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com> wrote: > > All, > > The often misunderstood GetElementPtr (GEP) instruction now has its own > FAQ document. For all of you that have struggled with understanding how > this instruction works, hopefully this document will make it clear and > help you with your use of L...

This just in from Oscar .. Reid -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Oscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> > To: Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com> > Subject: Re: svn issues > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:09:17 +0200 > > Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com> writes: > > > Hi David, > > > > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 10:38 -0500, David A. Greene wrote: > >> I'm getting a lot of errors...

On 3/11/07, Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com> wrote: > Could you submit the patch? We could make sure that 2.0 doesn't have the > same problem. Sure, I can't test this from where I am now but if anyone can take it for a spin to test it and verify the fix then by all means check it in. I'm just providing a hand-edi...

All, The often misunderstood GetElementPtr (GEP) instruction now has its own FAQ document. For all of you that have struggled with understanding how this instruction works, hopefully this document will make it clear and help you with your use of LLVM. Many thanks to Chris Lattner for setting me straight on how this instruction works and reviewing the document. Document Link :

...over the allocation of memory, then I should avoid using integers with bit widths larger than 64 bits (or perhaps 128)? Is there a hard rule for an integer being stack allocated, ie. one that doesn't depend on the current implementation details? Sandro On 6/18/07, Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com> wrote: > Sandro Magi wrote: > > >Where does the storage for large bit width integers come from? Are > >very large numbers heap allocated? > > > > > The ConstantInt class stores integer values. Large or not they are > stored using an APInt object. APInt...

...don't have your environment or compiler. However, this really smells like a compiler or stdint.h bug to me. This code compiles fine on many unix platforms and also under mingw. Reid. > > Aaron > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Reid Spencer" <rspencer at reidspencer.com> > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 9:08 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM Cygwin build RLIMIT_RSS configuration problem > > > > Hi Aaron, > > > > On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 20:43 +000...

Hi Reid, Cygwin 'sys/resource.h' has get/setrlimit() functions support for RLIMIT_DATA and RLIMIT_AS but not RLIMIT_RSS. Aaron ----- Original Message ----- From: "Reid Spencer" <rspencer at reidspencer.com> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 8:32 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM Cygwin build RLIMIT_RSS configuration problem > Hi Aaaron, > > On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 19:50 +0000, Aaron Gray wrote: >> In order...

...ke[2]: *** [libgcc/./_eprintf.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/build/llvm-gcc4/gcc' make[1]: *** [libgcc.a] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/build/llvm-gcc4/gcc' make: *** [install-gcc] Error 2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Reid Spencer" <rspencer at reidspencer.com> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 4:15 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Cygwin release build error > Aaron, > > On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 15:40 +0000, Aaron Gray wrote: >> I am getting an "--emit-llvm...

Hi Aaaron, On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 19:50 +0000, Aaron Gray wrote: > In order to get Cygwin working there is a need to add a > HAVE_RLIMIT_RSS and associated logic. This was just recently added. Does cygwin even have getrlimit and setrlimit? IIRC correctly, it doesn't. So, perhaps these functions need to be written differently for Cygwin. What's the equivalent win32 call? If cygwin

On 2/23/07, Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com> wrote: > > However, if I run the AutoRegen.sh script (after modifying it to > > accept autoconf 2.61, which I think is fine as gentoo slots it the > > same as the 2.5[0-9] versions), the configure no longer works: > > ~/programming/llvm-1.9/projects/zhe $ cd autoco...

Hi Simon, What version of llvm-gcc did you configure LLVM with? If you don't know, please send your configure.out file from your LLVM_OBJ_ROOT Thanks, Reid. On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 12:01 +1000, Simon Burton wrote: > >From CVS: > > llvm[3]: Compiling SJLJ-Exception.cpp for Debug build (bytecode) > SJLJ-Exception.cpp:16:19: cstdlib: No such file or directory >

Hi all, On 11/28/06, Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com> wrote: > * Venue: West Coast, USA. Probably either San Francisco Bay Area or > Seattle > * Time Frame: Post 2.0 release, summer 2007 > * Topics: Anything related to use or development of LLVM I'd vote for Seattle. The costs of organization should be lower than in the Bay...

The LLVM website seems to be down. Aaron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070218/c5c21361/attachment.html>

Seems okay for me. Check your local network. On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 17:44 +0000, Aaron Gray wrote: > The LLVM website seems to be down. > > Aaron > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 23:40 +0100, Andreas Fredriksson wrote: > On 3/10/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > > It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to > > work also. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it > > doesn't due to recent STL issues. Versions prior to 2003 won't work. > >

...en it myself, and a predefined value could be inappropriate. Most of the other changes seem to be about inserting casts, and I'd like to know what errors they are fixing. The casts are not needed with GCC or VS 2003. Andreas Fredriksson wrote: > On 3/11/07, Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com> wrote: > >> Could you submit the patch? We could make sure that 2.0 doesn't have the >> same problem. > > Sure, I can't test this from where I am now but if anyone can take it > for a spin to test it and verify the fix then by all means check it > in. I&...

On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 15:50 -0700, leo han wrote: > Hello, I have a question about the constant folding for fdiv instructions. > For the instruction "fdiv double 0.0, 0.0", the folded result is inf. I > think this should be nan. Can anyone tell me why it is not nan? I think the specification says that it is "undefined" so any value will do. inf is just as undefined