search for: reiding

Hi everyone. I just got a copy of Win2k in and have been messing with it. Have a question, and have searched the archives for the answer, but didn't find it. Can Win2k domain logon to a pre-3.0.0 samba server? Or di I need to get TNG running? I can get NT4.0 boxes to authenticate and login fine (Samba pre-3.0.0), but Win2k keeps complaining: "The following error occurred validating

Hi Reid, If an argument is a pointer and the function changes the value it pointed to, do you know how to get that updated value after executing the wrapper function? Thanks. Vu On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Reid Kleckner <reid.kleckner at gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Vu Le <vmle at ucdavis.edu> wrote: > > Hi, > > I want to implement a tool

No, I don't feel strongly about it... it's just annoying to have things change on me that break habits :) On the other hand, I do feel strongly about the tests in llvm-test that are now failing on me because they explicitly include alloca.h, a file that does not exist on FreeBSD. I can supply a patch to take out the include, of course, but the problem then becomes that the tests will

Wow... it is nearly twice as fast. But it tried to install stuff in /usr/local (and as I wasn't root...) and it didn't do that before. As I don't care about profiling or tracing, I didn't bother to su and do it again. On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:45:35 -0800 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > The entire makefile system was rewritten a couple of weeks ago. This is

This kind of thing is one of the many reasons we broke llvm-test out to a separate project. It has multiple purposes. Its a correctness test on LLVM, its what we base our compiler benchmarks on, and its also where a lot of the research gets done. You've been bitten by the latt(n)er. :) At some point I'd like to see us make some distinctions so that there is a correctness test suite whose

If you know the prototype of f, you can just use getPointerToFunction and cast the result: // Let F be an llvm::Function* referring to 'f'. void (*f)(int*) = (void (*)(int*))JIT->getPointerToFunction(F); int a; f(&a); // read a I haven't compiled this, it's a guess at the usage from memory. Reid On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Vu Le <vmle at ucdavis.edu> wrote:

Just a reminder that the scheduled shutdown will begin in less than 12 hours. Reid. On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 15:57 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > All, > > The web server and subversion will experience a restart and possibly > several service interruptions this Sunday morning. Services will be > available during this time but may be interrupted on occasion during > this period. You

I'll wait for the research. We should try, as much as possible, to make it work with just what the compiler provides and without third party packages. Thanks, reid. On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 07:46, Jeff Cohen wrote: > I added the include of cstudio and it fails with plain VC7.1; the file > does not exist. > > Add it for now. If it is impossible to build with VC7.1 and without

The default prefix is /usr/local but I would recommend that when you configure LLVm you do so with: configure --prefix=/me/llvm/install/dir ... so that installation occurs in a place you have write access. If you feel strongly about restoring the install-bytecode target, feel free to file a bug. Reid. On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 09:12, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Wow... it is nearly twice as fast. But

Upon system boot, is it ok to mount OCFS2 mounts from /etc/rc.local rather than /etc/fstab ? Are there any downsides to using rc.local that you are aware of? Example /etc/rc.local script: #!/bin/sh # # This script will be executed *after* all the other init scripts. # You can put your own initialization stuff in here if you don't # want to do the full Sys V style init stuff.

Just a reminder that the scheduled service interruptions will begin in approximately one hour. Reid. On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 22:27 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > Just a reminder that the scheduled shutdown will begin in less than 12 > hours. > > Reid. > > On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 15:57 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > > All, > > > > The web server and subversion will

But there already was an "install", and it did far more than install the bytecode files. That changed too? On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:28:27 -0800 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Yeah, its just "install" now. > > I'll fix the documentation. > > Reid. > > On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 23:19, Jeff Cohen wrote: > > My rebuild from scratch

All, Just to be really clear. The web-site already says this, but .. Despite this message: On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 19:17 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Only attendees can get the T-Shirt as there isn't funds to > ship them all over the place. > > Reid. If you can't attend the meeting you can still get a T-Shirt but you'll have to pay the shipping

Hi Scott, On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 18:31 -0700, Scott Michel wrote: > +2 Large T-shirts (me and Mark Thomas, also from Aerospace). Are you confirming Mark Thomas as attending then? Only attendees can get the T-Shirt as there isn't funds to ship them all over the place. Reid. > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at

I mis-stated what I think should be deleted. The block of code from "GlobalVariable *IOB = 0;" to the end of the loop should be delted because the only effect the loop has is on the IOB variable and that variable is never used after the loop. Reid. On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 18:14, Reid Spencer wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on bug 122, consolidating the interface to the

Hi Robert, Can you ping the code owners about these patches. It might be good to write a separate email per code owner and cc the appropriate -commits list. Thanks, Tom On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 06:16:44PM +0400, Robert Khasanov wrote: > Hi Tom, > > I would like to nominate the following patches to be backported to 3.4.1 > > Clang: > 1. r204742 - Zinovy Nis <zinovy.nis at

Fair enough... The following tests under MultiSource fail: Benchmarks/Olden/power Benchmarks/OptimizerEval Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks Benchmarks/MallocBench/perl Applications/sgefa However, they also fail in the exact same way without my change. OptimizerEval appears to be non-deterministic; it produces different output each time it runs. Everything else passes. I also compared a few *.s files

On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 13:37 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: > >>> You all just need remove "stacker_rt.ll". the stacker_rt.ll is a > >> rebuilt so they output proper .ll files. Reid, can you change the > >> makefile rule to use "llvm-gcc -S -emit-llvm -o - | llvm-upgrade > $@" or > >> the

Ever since we have installed OCFS2, we have had extremely slow performance in the ocfs2console. It can take us over 30 minutes to do the simplest tasks. We do not have this type of performance with other xwindows applications on our server. Does anyone have any performance improvement suggestions for the ocfs2console? Thanks, Reid

Reid Spencer, thank you for your quick responce, finally i got to my PC at home. You wrote: > Attached are three files: "valery.cpp" which contains your original, > "reid.cpp" which contains corrections to most of the FIXME items and > "diffs" which shows the differences between them. The differences > should be instructive on what to do. You were