Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "rehl6".
Did you mean:
rehl
2018 May 13
0
Using C++14 code in LLVM
...l distro version which supports
that toolchain for each of the major distros. For those of us which
ship software using LLVM, that's the mapping we really need to decide
whether a proposed upgrade is an issue or not.
For instance, I can probably upgrade to any compiler easily buildable on
REHL6, but likely *can not* upgrade to any compile not buildable on REHL6.
Having this up front saves a lot of research and makes the discussion a
lot easier internally.
Thanks.
Philip
On 05/10/2018 10:01 AM, JF Bastien via llvm-dev wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Six more months have come and gone,...
2018 May 13
1
Using C++14 code in LLVM
...pports that
> toolchain for each of the major distros. For those of us which ship
> software using LLVM, that's the mapping we really need to decide whether a
> proposed upgrade is an issue or not.
>
> For instance, I can probably upgrade to any compiler easily buildable on
> REHL6, but likely *can not* upgrade to any compile not buildable on REHL6.
>
> Having this up front saves a lot of research and makes the discussion a
> lot easier internally.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Philip
>
>
> On 05/10/2018 10:01 AM, JF Bastien via llvm-dev wrote:
>
> Hi fo...
2018 May 10
4
Using C++14 code in LLVM
Hi folks!
Six more months have come and gone, and maybe we could move LLVM to C++14 now?
The issues I picked out from the last discussion:
Some folks want an official policy about compiler support before updating the standard version we use.
Worries about which GCC version is available in which distro.
Worries about MSVC.
Instead of rehashing the compiler per distro surveys from previous