Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "regs2".
Did you mean:
regs
2014 Aug 05
2
[LLVMdev] Concerning not relevant argument count in TableGen Patterns.
...er type
operands: "/mov R1, R2/"
For this purpose I assume that the instruction definition in the
TargetInstrInfo.td file should be like:
at first I am defining the class form my instruction:
*class Mymov<bits<6> op, string instr_asm>: FI<op, (outs Regs1:$rs),
(ins Regs2:$rt),
!strconcat(instr_asm, "\t$rt, $rs"),
[], NoItinerary> {
let imm16 = 0;
}*
where *Regs1* and *Regs2* are corresponding *RegisterClasses*.
Then I need to define the instruction:
*def MOVInstr : Mymov<0x2, "mov">;*
*def : TargetPat<(int_m...
2004 Jul 07
1
Histograms, density, and relative frequencies
...dmit that some of the underlying mathematics of the
density discussion are beyond my current understanding, but I am looking
into it.
I have a data set (600,000 obs) used to parameterize a probabilistic causal
model where each obs is a population response for one of 2 classes (either
regs1 and regs2). I have been attempting to create 1 marginal probability
plot with 2 lines (one for each class). Using my rather rough code, I
created a plot that seems to adhere to the commonly used (although from
what I can understand wrong) relative frequency histogram approach.
My rough code looks like...
2012 Sep 20
1
AIX 5.8p1?
....ibm.com/webapp/iwm/web/reg/download.do?source=aixbp&lang=en_US&S_PKG=openssh&cp=UTF-8> is 5.8p1 (5.8.0.6202), does this address the above vulnerabilities? I'm having trouble locating change logs between these two versions.
IBMs readme<https://www6.software.ibm.com/sdfdl/2v2/regs2/sihourn/openssh/Xa.2/Xb.YpX6IhcfCLTVpsjWMhdhZIbI9rXXMpck6RkO-ayBjQ/Xc.openssh/Readme_5.8.0.6102.txt/Xd./Xf.LPr.AAvi/Xg.6692599/Xi.aixbp/XY.regsrvs/XZ.4gNj28KKlrh5yUcStvOhzTVtLmI/Readme_5.8.0.6102.txt> for 5.8p1 does not mention these CVEs.
Thanks,
Ty Haller | Lead Administrator - System Serv...
2014 Jan 28
2
[LLVMdev] Load Instruction that changes value of two registers
...Instruction Lowering)?
It would be fine if I could tell LLVM that reg2 is invalid after a load
Operation, but I don#t know how to do that...
I tried the following in TableGen to let LLVM know that Resg2 isn't valid
anymore after a load but it didn't produce the desired result:
let Defs = [Regs2] in
{
def LD: Inst<(outs Regs1:$dst), (ins MEM:$addr),
"load $addr, $dst;",
[(set Regs1:$dst, (load addr:$addr))]>;
}
Thanks in advance,
Markus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachmen...