search for: reglist

...b Stoklund Olesen wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> After Bob fixed the two-address format of the ARM ldm/stm instructions, a problem remains. The load multiple instruction looks like: >> >> // A list of registers separated by comma. Used by load/store multiple. >> def reglist : Operand<i32> { >> let PrintMethod = "printRegisterList"; >> } >> >> def LDM : AXI4ld<(outs), (ins addrmode4:$addr, pred:$p, >> reglist:$dsts, variable_ops), >> IndexModeNone, LdStMulFrm, IIC_iLoadm, &gt...

...operands + variable_ops. >>> >>> How can you specify a named, variable list of output operands? >> >> Why do you need to do this? You currently can't do it. > > Because an instruction like LDM loads a variable number of registers. When it specifies "reglist:$dsts, variable_ops", those are really output registers, the registers being loaded. Ah, gotcha. LDM is a particularly evil instruction to model. I agree it is best to model them as a variable number of outputs. > I am assuming that the operands on a machine instruction are, in order: f...

...the regression. Please ser the following code: #Datei einlesen residual = read.csv2("E:***Input-R_Renditen.csv",header=TRUE, sep=";") #Aktientitel alist <- list() for (a in 2:11){ #Regression ? ?#L?nge Gesamtzeit ? ?t <- 243 ? ?tx <- t-59 ? ?#L?nge Regression ? ?reglist <- list() ? ?for (i in 1:tx){ ? ?j <- i+59 ? ?#RegressionsVariable ? ?x = residual[i:j,a] ? ?rm = residual[i:j,12] ? ?smb = residual[i:j,13] ? ?hml = residual[i:j,14] ? ?rf = residual[i:j,15] ? ?#?berschussrenditen ? ?ex=x-rf ? ?erm=rm-rf ? ?#Regression ? ?reg <- lm(ex~erm+smb+hml) ? ?r...

Hi, After Bob fixed the two-address format of the ARM ldm/stm instructions, a problem remains. The load multiple instruction looks like: // A list of registers separated by comma. Used by load/store multiple. def reglist : Operand<i32> { let PrintMethod = "printRegisterList"; } def LDM : AXI4ld<(outs), (ins addrmode4:$addr, pred:$p, reglist:$dsts, variable_ops), IndexModeNone, LdStMulFrm, IIC_iLoadm, "ldm${addr:submode}${p}\t$add...

...ar 19, 2010, at 7:46 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > Hi, > > After Bob fixed the two-address format of the ARM ldm/stm instructions, a problem remains. The load multiple instruction looks like: > > // A list of registers separated by comma. Used by load/store multiple. > def reglist : Operand<i32> { > let PrintMethod = "printRegisterList"; > } > > def LDM : AXI4ld<(outs), (ins addrmode4:$addr, pred:$p, > reglist:$dsts, variable_ops), > IndexModeNone, LdStMulFrm, IIC_iLoadm, > &qu...

The blow snippet in target.td shows the regList in RegisterClass is typed as dag. Why not make it a simple list, such as list<Register>? class RegisterClass<string namespace, list<ValueType> regTypes, int alignment, dag regList> Thanks, -Thomson -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: &...

variable_ops is used in the tablegen defs for many targets to denote instructions that a variable number of inputs, but it seems that there aren't any targets for which this results in variable elements in the instruction encoding (and thus in assembler parsing), since the tablegen generated assembly matcher ($(Target)GenAsmMatcher.inc) simply assumes that variable_ops are not to be parsed

...rInfo::isVirtualRegister(VirtReg)) && (VRM->getPhys(VirtReg) == REG_Y)) { LiveInterval &LI = LIS->getInterval(VirtReg); unassign(LI, REG_Y); enqueue(&LI); } } RegClassInfo.runOnMachineFunction(VRM->getMachineFunction()); // update reserve reglist So similar to what's done in LRE_WillShrinkVirtReg(), it searches for live intervals where REG_Y is allocated and evicts them for reallocation. I don't know if there's a faster way of doing this but it's working :) About your first question: the register has to be reserved througho...

On 08/31/2015 03:59 PM, Matthias Braun wrote: > Looks to me like the alignment is specified in tablegen. From Target.td: > > class RegisterClass<string namespace, list<ValueType> regTypes, int alignment, > dag regList, RegAltNameIndex idx = NoRegAltName> > > X86RegisterInfo.td: > > def VR256 : RegisterClass<"X86", [v32i8, v16i16, v8i32, v4i64, v8f32, v4f64], > 256, (sequence "YMM%u", 0, 15)>; > def VR256X : RegisterClass<"X86"...

...ow to handle the distinction between variadic defines and uses and my current solution is this: I introduce a new dag item in Instruction called VariadicOperandList, which by default is undefined. It keeps a marker variable_* and all operands which are placeholders for variable lists (like 'reglist' on ARM). I think it's the cleanest solution to keep them in a seperate dag, because else either register defines would be in the 'ins' list or the parser would become much more complex to change the order of operands to get the variable items in 'outs' to the end of the...

Am Mittwoch, 26. September 2012, 11:18:20 schrieb Jakob Stoklund Olesen: > Hi Christoph, > > As you noticed, MCInstrDesc doesn't distinguish between variadic uses and > defs. Since variadic instructions will always require some kind of special > handling, it doesn't seem worthwhile to make the model more detailed. I don't see what makes them so different from other

Looking around today, it appears that TargetRegisterClass and MCRegisterClass only includes a single alignment. This is documented as being the minimum legal alignment, but it appears to often be greater than this in practice. For instance, on x86 the alignment of %ymm0 is listed as 32, not 1. Does anyone know why this is? Additionally, where are these alignments actually defined? I

Hello R list, This is a question for anyone who has used the by() command. I would like to perform a regression on a data frame by several factors. Using by() I think that I have able to perform this using the following: > lm.r <- by(master, list(Sectionf=Sectionf, startd=startd), function(x) lm (tot.c ~ starttime, data = x)) So that is, I would like to perform separate regressions for

...&& (VRM->getPhys(VirtReg) == REG_Y)) > { > LiveInterval &LI = LIS->getInterval(VirtReg); > unassign(LI, REG_Y); > enqueue(&LI); > } > } > RegClassInfo.runOnMachineFunction(VRM->getMachineFunction()); // update reserve reglist > > So similar to what's done in LRE_WillShrinkVirtReg(), it searches for live intervals where REG_Y is allocated and evicts them for reallocation. I don't know if there's a faster way of doing this but it's working :) Looks good. It is probably faster to scan the LiveInter...

On 19 January 2014 10:19, Thomson <lilotom at gmail.com> wrote: > The blow snippet in target.td shows the regList in RegisterClass is typed as > dag. Why not make it a simple list, such as list<Register>? I don't know about the original reason, but these days we have a few operators in use to make constructing those sets easier which would be much harder to do for lists. E.g. "(sequence &quo...

On Nov 29, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Borja Ferrer wrote: > Yes, I want the register to be allocatable when there are no stack frames used in the function so it can be used for other purposes. In fact, I looked at how other backends solve this problem, but they are all too conservative by always reserving the register which in my case it is not a good solution because of the performance impact of not

Yes, I want the register to be allocatable when there are no stack frames used in the function so it can be used for other purposes. In fact, I looked at how other backends solve this problem, but they are all too conservative by always reserving the register which in my case it is not a good solution because of the performance impact of not having this register available. I find very interesting

...1e19 drm/nvc0-/gr: handle fwmthd interrupts in ucode e1b22bc drm/nvc0-/gr: fiddle some magic around strand init 96616b4 drm/nv108/gr: initial support (need external fuc) daa9ab5 drm/nv108/ce: enable copy engines a763951 drm/nv108/fifo: initial support a0f95f1 drm/nvf0/gr: remove a copy+pasto in ctx reglist 67af60f drm/nvc0-/gr: bring in some macros to abstract falcon isa differences 90d6db1 drm/nouveau/falcon: use vmalloc to create firwmare copies d96bf43 drm/nouveau/gem: remove (now) unneeded pre-validate fence sync cef9e99 drm/nouveau/ttm: explicitly wait for bo idle before memcpy buffer move 35b81...

...oken::Identifier)) return Error(RegLoc, "register expected"); int RegNum = MatchRegisterName(RegTok.getString()); if (RegNum == -1) return Error(RegLoc, "register expected"); - Parser.Lex(); // Eat identifier token. + Lex(); // Eat identifier token. unsigned RegList = 1 << RegNum; int HighRegNum = RegNum; // TODO ranges like "{Rn-Rm}" - while (Parser.getTok().is(AsmToken::Comma)) { - Parser.Lex(); // Eat comma token. + while (getTok().is(AsmToken::Comma)) { + Lex(); // Eat comma token. - const AsmToken &RegTok = Parser....