search for: registry_changes_for_nt4

...? If so, then it shouldn't have the dot '.' in it, but if it is a replacement for your domain, is your domain longer than 15 characters ? Sort this problem and see if it works, the other thing to check, have you done the registry changes ? see here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Registry_changes_for_NT4-style_domains Rowland

When I enable server signing in Samba (server signing = mandatory), I can still join a Window 7 machine to the domain but I am no longer able to log on into the domain using a domain user. Is this normal? I am using Samba 3.6.3 on Linux 12.04. Is there anything that needs to be configured on the Windows machine? Thanks, Ali

...y server with PDC option, all the desktops over the lan, are Windows 7, I read over the internet the problem that DNS is incorrect and the desktop cannot join to domain, I?m facing this problem right now. I have applied the registry entries to the desktop as says in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Registry_changes_for_NT4-style_domains but the problem persist, any clue? Thank you!

Just checking if anybody has Samba's classic DC functioning with Windows 10 domain member clients? In particular, I'm interested in any tests with git master or 4.2. I'm not talking about samba4 DCs (our AD DC), but with the NT4-like mode. The reason I ask is that I've got reports it doesn't work, and I've checked with Microsoft who basically say 'NT4 support ended

...tory Server Signing with Windows 7 > Envoy? par : samba-bounces at lists.samba.org > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > I am fairly certain you do not want server signing = mandatory > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Registry_changes_for_NT4-style_domains > > > > > > On 01/05/15 11:31, ali-reza.fahimi at schneider-electric.com wrote: > > > > > > When I enable server signing in Samba (server signing = mandatory), > I can > > still join a Window 7 machine to the domain but I am no longer able...

...> >> if it is a replacement for your >> domain, is your domain longer than 15 characters ? > No > >> Sort this problem and >> see if it works, the other thing to check, have you done the registry >> changes ? see here: >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Registry_changes_for_NT4-style_domains >> > Registry entries are present. Otherwise the clients wouldn't have been able to > join the domain. > >> Rowland > Harry Who owns the share directory /home/ldap ? Does 'harry' exist in /etc/passwd ? Does the group 'users' exist in /etc...

...current effort was the result of a special favour, and > these things (rightly) do expire. I setup a Samba NT4 PDC it in my test environment with Samba 4.2.1 and Win10 TP Build 9926: First, the two registry keys are required to add/set like done since Win7 (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Registry_changes_for_NT4-style_domains). Then you join the domain + reboot. But if you try to login now, it is denied ("...no logon servers..."). To workaround this, I needed to set "max protocol = NT1" in smb.conf. This allows the Win10 box to login to the Samba NT4 domain. What was interesting is,...

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> wrote: > Hello Scott, > > Am 04.06.2015 um 08:47 schrieb Scott Lovenberg: >> Marc, I'm assuming your test was a clean Samba install with stock >> configurations and a clean Windows-10 9926 (with no previous contact >> to either AD or NT4 domains)? > > Yes. It was a new installed

After researching win7 and samba issues we upgraded to 3.5.22. We still can not connect to shares on the RHEL 5.9 box. Odd thing is, when attempting to connect we never see anything in the logs, which makes me think its a networking issue. We've turned off the firewall on the win 7 box, but still nothing. We can ping the RHEL server from the Win 7 box. Any insights or suggestions would

I've used Samba to share files on my home LAN, consisting of Linux and Windows systems. So far, I've never enabled Homegroups on the Windows systems. I'm now asked to set up a larger LAN in a school computer laboratory, consisting of 30+ Windows 7 machines, several printers and scanners, and two Linux workstations. I expect that homegroups would be the easiest way to set up the

...? par : samba-bounces at lists.samba.org > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > I am fairly certain you do not want server signing = mandatory > > > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Registry_changes_for_NT4-style_domains > > > > > > > > > > > > On 01/05/15 11:31, ali-reza.fahimi at schneider-electric.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > When I enable server signing in Samba (server signing = mandatory), > > I can > > > still join a...

Hi, I am using a samba server for file sharing in our companies IPv4 based LAN. The samba server is running as VM on a ubuntu 14.04 qemu/kvm host using ubuntu 14.04 as OS. I am using the lastet version available for samba: 4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.3 My Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 client are able to find the server and connect to the shares but the Windows 8.1 client of a colleague is not able to

...cial favour, and >> these things (rightly) do expire. > > > I setup a Samba NT4 PDC it in my test environment with Samba 4.2.1 and > Win10 TP Build 9926: > > First, the two registry keys are required to add/set like done since > Win7 > (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Registry_changes_for_NT4-style_domains). > > Then you join the domain + reboot. > > But if you try to login now, it is denied ("...no logon servers..."). To > workaround this, I needed to set "max protocol = NT1" in smb.conf. This > allows the Win10 box to login to the Samba NT4 domain...

I stood up a samba 4 (4.0.9) Active Directory domain controller on a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.3 server, configured in accordance with the Samba AD DC HOWTO <https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO> , and tailored to the domain name I want. I'm trying to join a Windows 7 Enterprise Edition client to the domain. Windows responds with "Your computer could not be joined

On 18/01/15 08:36, Dr. Harry Knitter wrote: > Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> schrieb am 17.01.2015: >> You could try answering Jeremy's question >> >> Rowland > did, however my answer was sent only as PM, sorry. > This entry is the default. However I set it explicitly. > Did not work > > Harry Please don't send PM's, it breaks