search for: registertable

Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "registertable".

2013 Oct 06
1
[LLVMdev] JIT has no EH, what RegisterTable and friends doing there?
RegisterTable() is never called and so the whole machinary is without use. Shouldn't all these functions be removed ? Yaron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131007/3c3274ad/attachment.html>
2020 Feb 10
2
How do SJLJ-Exceptions works?
Hello Clang- and LLVM-Experts, I was not sure which list is the right one, so I tried both - sorry for any inconvenient >o< Lately I was working a lot with exceptions under Windows and especially with the Clang compiler. Out of curiosity I came along "Exception Handling in LLVM" and tried to understand the SJLJ exception handling. At first glance this made total sense to me! Store
1997 Dec 03
0
help to logmessages"client requested max send size 2920"
What 's wrong on my configuration and what means message "client requested max send size 2920 " Only registert User can use printer on my server. Connections: win95-------------->Samba 1.9.17p2 (linux 2.030) Sorry for my bad english H.Diem ################################################################### -----------part of smb.conf --------------- [global]
2006 Nov 04
1
Only one out of 10 remote extensions expiring registry
I have about 20+ phones on a server, all set for registry expiry 1 min. But only this one, with 2 accounts, keeps re-registerting itself. All the time this is what I see on asterisk CLI and it is kind of annoying. What only this phone does this and no other. Its on a remote location. All phones are Grandstream GXP-2000. -- Registered SIP '502' at 64.101.221.250 port 18639 expires 60
2008 Feb 04
0
[LLVMdev] Exception handling in JIT
...> } > + > + /// InstallExceptionTableRegister - The JIT will use the given > function > + /// to register the exception tables it generates. > + static void InstallExceptionTableRegister(void (*F)(void*)) { > + ExceptionTableRegister = F; > + } > + > + /// RegisterTable - Registers the given pointer as an exception > table. It uses > + /// the ExceptionTableRegister function. > + static void RegisterTable(void* res) { > + ExceptionTableRegister(res); > + } > > protected: > explicit ExecutionEngine(ModuleProvider *P); > Index: i...
2008 Feb 01
2
[LLVMdev] Exception handling in JIT
Dear all, Here's a new patch with Evan's comments (thx Evan!) and some cleanups. Now the (duplicated) exception handling code is in a new file: lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JITDwarfEmitter. This patch should work on linux/x86 and linux/ppc (tested). Nicolas -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: jit-exceptions.patch URL:
2012 Sep 24
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Fix for bug in JIT exception table allocation
...fferBegin = SavedBufferBegin; > > 91464 jyasskin BufferEnd = SavedBufferEnd; > > 91464 jyasskin CurBufferPtr = SavedCurBufferPtr; > > 47079 geoffray > > 102865 baldrick if (JITExceptionHandling) { > > 127047 echristo TheJIT->RegisterTable(F.getFunction(), FrameRegister); > > 82418 rnk } > > 47079 geoffray } > > > > Any suggestions as to who would be the best qualified to look at it? > > > > > > > > > > Ciao, Duncan. > > > > > > > +...
2013 May 31
2
Help me understand these log messages
OK, I need a bit of help here. I'm configuring a new Asterisk 11 system and I accidentally let my firewall rules drop for a day or so. When I logged in today, I found messages like the ones below on my asterisk console. Obviously somebody was trying to take advantage of my carelessness. So can someone explain what would cause these types of messages to show up on my console? I understand
2008 Mar 30
3
[LLVMdev] Being able to know the jitted code-size before emitting
Hi everyone, vmkit requires to know the size of a jitted method before emitting the method. This allows to allocate the correct size for the method. The attached patch creates this functionality when the flag SizedMemoryCode is on. In order to implement this functionality, i had to virtualize some MachineCodeEmitter functions. Is it OK to commit the patch? Thanks, Nicolas --------------
2008 Apr 01
2
[LLVMdev] Being able to know the jitted code-size before emitting
...ferPtr = MemMgr- >> >>> startExceptionTable(F.getFunction(), >>> >> >> ActualSize); >> BufferEnd = BufferBegin+ActualSize; >> @@ -598,11 +639,10 @@ >> TheJIT->RegisterTable(FrameRegister); >> } >> MMI->EndFunction(); >> - >> return false; >> } >> >> -void JITEmitter::emitConstantPool(MachineConstantPool *MCP) { >> +void JITEmitter::initConstantPool(MachineConstantPool *MCP) { >> const std::vector<Mach...
2008 Mar 31
0
[LLVMdev] Being able to know the jitted code-size before emitting
...CurBufferPtr; > - > + > BufferBegin = CurBufferPtr = MemMgr- > >startExceptionTable(F.getFunction(), > > ActualSize); > BufferEnd = BufferBegin+ActualSize; > @@ -598,11 +639,10 @@ > TheJIT->RegisterTable(FrameRegister); > } > MMI->EndFunction(); > - > return false; > } > > -void JITEmitter::emitConstantPool(MachineConstantPool *MCP) { > +void JITEmitter::initConstantPool(MachineConstantPool *MCP) { > const std::vector<MachineConstantPoolEntry> &Consta...
2008 Apr 01
0
[LLVMdev] Being able to know the jitted code-size before emitting
...gt;> + >>> BufferBegin = CurBufferPtr = MemMgr- >>> >>>> startExceptionTable(F.getFunction(), >>>> >>> >>> ActualSize); >>> BufferEnd = BufferBegin+ActualSize; >>> @@ -598,11 +639,10 @@ >>> TheJIT->RegisterTable(FrameRegister); >>> } >>> MMI->EndFunction(); >>> - >>> return false; >>> } >>> >>> -void JITEmitter::emitConstantPool(MachineConstantPool *MCP) { >>> +void JITEmitter::initConstantPool(MachineConstantPool *MCP) { >&gt...
2008 Apr 04
3
[LLVMdev] Being able to know the jitted code-size before emitting
...t;> >>>> >>>>> startExceptionTable(F.getFunction(), >>>>> >>>>> >>>> ActualSize); >>>> BufferEnd = BufferBegin+ActualSize; >>>> @@ -598,11 +639,10 @@ >>>> TheJIT->RegisterTable(FrameRegister); >>>> } >>>> MMI->EndFunction(); >>>> - >>>> return false; >>>> } >>>> >>>> -void JITEmitter::emitConstantPool(MachineConstantPool *MCP) { >>>> +void JITEmitter::initConstantPool(Mac...
2008 Apr 05
2
[LLVMdev] Being able to know the jitted code-size before emitting
...Function(), >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> ActualSize); >>>>>> BufferEnd = BufferBegin+ActualSize; >>>>>> @@ -598,11 +639,10 @@ >>>>>> TheJIT->RegisterTable(FrameRegister); >>>>>> } >>>>>> MMI->EndFunction(); >>>>>> - >>>>>> return false; >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> -void JITEmitter::emitConstantPool(MachineConstantPool *MCP) { &g...
2008 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Being able to know the jitted code-size before emitting
...>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ActualSize); >>>>>>> BufferEnd = BufferBegin+ActualSize; >>>>>>> @@ -598,11 +639,10 @@ >>>>>>> TheJIT->RegisterTable(FrameRegister); >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> MMI->EndFunction(); >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> return false; >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -void JITEmitter::emitConstantPool(Ma...
2008 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] Being able to know the jitted code-size before emitting
...;>>>> >>>>>> startExceptionTable(F.getFunction(), >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> ActualSize); >>>>> BufferEnd = BufferBegin+ActualSize; >>>>> @@ -598,11 +639,10 @@ >>>>> TheJIT->RegisterTable(FrameRegister); >>>>> } >>>>> MMI->EndFunction(); >>>>> - >>>>> return false; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> -void JITEmitter::emitConstantPool(MachineConstantPool *MCP) { >>>>> +void JIT...
2008 Apr 07
2
[LLVMdev] Being able to know the jitted code-size before emitting
...gt;>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ActualSize); >>>>>>>> BufferEnd = BufferBegin+ActualSize; >>>>>>>> @@ -598,11 +639,10 @@ >>>>>>>> TheJIT->RegisterTable(FrameRegister); >>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>> MMI->EndFunction(); >>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>> return false; >>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -void JIT...
2008 Apr 07
0
[LLVMdev] Being able to know the jitted code-size before emitting
...>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ActualSize); >>>>>>>>> BufferEnd = BufferBegin+ActualSize; >>>>>>>>> @@ -598,11 +639,10 @@ >>>>>>>>> TheJIT->RegisterTable(FrameRegister); >>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>> MMI->EndFunction(); >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> return false; >>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>> >>>>&g...