Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "registerroot".
Did you mean:
registerroots
2007 Aug 14
0
[LLVMdev] ocaml+llvm
...class ??? {
public:
// Allows the code generator to avoid inserting unnecessary GC
points.
bool RequiresGCPointsOfKind(GCPointKind Kind) const;
// If false, instructs the code generator to keep all GC roots
on the
// stack at GC points.
bool SupportsRegisterRoots() const; // false for now...
// Visits a GC point, including information necessary to
identify all
// live GC roots in the stack frame.
virtual bool VisitGCPoint(MachineInstruction *Point,
GCPointKind Kind,
i...
2017 Feb 15
2
[cfe-dev] [4.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 source and binaries available
...0001a29a2c in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) ()
#11 0x0000000001a2a28f in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) ()
With these mixed in from time to time:
#0 0x0000000001850825 in llvm::SUnit::ComputeDepth() ()
#1 0x00000000017d22a4 in llvm::GenericScheduler::registerRoots() ()
#2 0x00000000017c9002 in llvm::ScheduleDAGMI::initQueues(llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::SUnit*>, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::SUnit*>) ()
#3 0x00000000017c9439 in llvm::ScheduleDAGMILive::initQueues(llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::SUnit*>, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::SUnit*>) ()
#4 0x00000000017d3de3...
2008 Apr 29
0
[LLVMdev] getting started with IR needing GC
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 21:39 -0500, Lane Schwartz wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Gordon Henriksen
> <gordonhenriksen at mac.com> wrote:
> > On 2008-04-28, at 21:19, Lane Schwartz wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Gordon Henriksen <gordonhenriksen at mac.com
> > >> stack and discover the return address of each call frame.
2008 Apr 29
2
[LLVMdev] getting started with IR needing GC
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Gordon Henriksen
<gordonhenriksen at mac.com> wrote:
> On 2008-04-28, at 21:19, Lane Schwartz wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Gordon Henriksen <gordonhenriksen at mac.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>> If so, then a Collector plugin would need to have info about every
> >>> supported backend
2007 Aug 14
4
[LLVMdev] ocaml+llvm
On Aug 14, 2007, at 00:23, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
>
>> Changing these structures breaks binary compatibility (including C
>> interop).
>
> If that is so, and if there is no way around this, then it makes
> sense to develop some compatibility mode. How does native C code
> generate these tables?
I might've